Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The ethernet dongle I use on my MacBoook Pro gets pretty warm. One of the few things I like about this new MacBook Pro is the advertised battery life, which I think will get obliterated after you hook up a few dongles. Then we back to square one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lysingur
I've never been in an office of a major corporation that didn't use a fax machine. It's still the standard for signed invoices across the Western world.

I know. Maybe it's because I'm a millennial, but I just find it rather odd we're using fax machines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pootmatoot
I think everyone's expectation was sky high because it took apple so long to update the laptop, but I agree with you, what else could they have done?

Agreed that laptops are mature. That's why we don't necessarily expect revolutionary changes. But evolutionary changes ARE expected... and in fact required. That means better / faster / stronger / able to leap tall buildings in a single bound type changes. In real terms that means changes such as:
  • faster processors / more cores
  • faster graphics / more cores
  • faster memory / more memory
  • faster storage / more storage
  • faster communications across all types
  • better screen / more pixels / higher resolution
  • bigger battery / better battery life
 
  • Like
Reactions: duffman9000
Just look at the GPU.Why did they opt for AMD power guzzlers over the clearly superior NVIDIA Pascal.Also the GPUs are too weak for the asking price especially when laptops like Razer Blade with gaming GPUs in a average chassis exist

35W TDP over Nvidia power guzzling 80+W 1060, AMD can support external 5K display while Nvidia can't, 10 bit color on AMD while Nvidia can't, better OpenCL support on AMD and Apple isn't going to put some gamer cards into a super thin laptop. AMD is in fact the most superior choice in this form factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AfroAbel and fokmik
35W TDP over Nvidia power guzzling 80+W 1060, AMD can support external 5K display while Nvidia can't, 10 bit color on AMD while Nvidia can't, better OpenCL support on AMD and Apple isn't going to put some gamer cards into a super thin laptop. AMD is in fact the most superior choice in this form factor.
So true, sad that pro doesn't know this,only gamers around here
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atlantico
Adding a touch bar, rather than making the whole screen touch sensitive, is not necessarily a bad idea.

But removing the function keys - which have useful system functions for most people, and are really essential for some, like developers - is an absolutely TERRIBLE idea.

It has, at a stroke, made the MacBook Pro less useful for anyone that is visually impaired.

If you are going to introduce the touch bar, then it should have been placed above or below the screen, where you are already looking for visual information. At worst, it could have been placed above the standard function row of the keyboard.

But to remove the function row. No. Just no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatalogic
Personally I don't any reason to buy a new MacBook Pro. As long that there is no external keyboard doing the same as the Touch Bar. I take my macbook 15" daily with me. At the office I use an external keyboard, a second and third screen, once at home I use the laptop again connected to another screen with an external keyboard. It's only in the train or when I am working abroad that I use my laptop keyboard. Secondly non of the hardware improvements have convinced me to change my full option ;) mid2012 macbook pro. Doing so I will wait until a better hardware is available.
 
I honestly think they're not too prideful. Have you used a touchscreen for professional work? I have and it's horrible. You have to clean it everyday and the smudges get in the way of my color grading and overlay work.

Completely agree I purchased a bunch of touchscreen PCs and Laptops for use in a environment using software that seemed ideal for a touch screen. After a bit of novelty value nobody used the touchscreen, it just didn't work if you needed a keyboard as well. No positioning of the touchscreen and keyboard worked comfortably.

At least round here we have to do Display Screen Equipment assessments to ensure that workstations are compliant with a whole bunch of guidelines to not cause a manner of health problems. I can't see how a large touch screen would be compliant for regular use.
 
It's good to see real reviews (pros and cons) coming out. Still, these are people with early access. I'd like to see reviews by people with shipped units + time to really see if it's useful. That and I want to try them myself in the store. I want to see if that keyboard is tolerable or not, I want to see if the display is as good as they say, I want to see if the extra price is worth it for me. I don't losing ports and magsafe but I can endure it if the value proposition is there. I'm just not sold.

Still, it's nice to see a reviewer say if you have a 2013 MBP you're probably not too interested in upgrading as performance isn't that different.
 
I think it's a great use of space otherwise occupied by little used function keys.

If "little used" is an indication of where to put a touch bar:

Next up: Touch bar extended to Caps Lock!
Then the right command and option key.
Then the tilde key
Then the letter j

:)
 
I think this guy Cunningham nails it. It remains to be seen if Touch Bar takes off, but adoption will only happen if people are able to afford it. Get it into the hands of the people.


The main problem at this point isn't that the Touch Bar is a bad idea, but that these laptops cost a whole bunch of money. Great, premium PC laptops are available for half this price, even if Apple still maintains an edge when it comes to graphics and SSD speeds. It really feels like the Touch Bar needs to be included in the $1,499 model, and that versions of the new designs without Touch Bars should be the entry level systems—right now, Apple's entry-level Mac laptops were all released in mid 2015, and that's only going to get more embarrassing as time moves on.
 
It's a "gimmick" until the rest of the industry copies it next year.

I think it's a great use of space otherwise occupied by little used function keys.

I use the function keys literally every ~10 minutes on average. I have them mapped to windows within screen and couldn't live without them. I understand they are still there in Terminal but the turning off after 85 seconds would drive me crazy.

I think the new MacBooks are cool and the bar looks great but when I upgrade ill probably not get the touch-bar version.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernuli
Cunningham noted the Touch Bar's display dims after 60 seconds and turns off completely after 85 seconds to preserve battery life. You can tap the Touch Bar, the keyboard, or the trackpad to wake it back up. He said there is no option to change this behavior in System Preferences.

Well this is pretty awful. So much for being able to quickly pause music when someone comes to my desk! I was also hoping for apps that could continuously update information at a glance in this area. To replace buttons with something that you have to wake up each time you want to use it is pretty bad. I thought a big benefit of an OLED display was lower battery usage? I understand dimming, but turning it off completely after only 85 seconds with no setting? Inexcusable. Hopefully someone hacks a way around this.
 
The whole idea of a "Touch Bar" just sounds very invasive.

I'd have preferred that Apple switch out the normal space bar with a "safe space" bar.
 
The function keys may be little used by yourself, but I use them all the time to change screen brightness and volume; having to dig for these basic features would be very annoying to me.

Would it have caused too much clutter to have simply put the touch bar above the function keys? Perhaps...
You can access things like brightness and volume with only 1 tap and slide (to increase decrease)

no digging required.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fokmik
how you feel about the ports and the bar notwithstanding, the most disappointing aspect from these reviews seems to be battery life. They cut out large portions of capacity and now the dang thing can't even top 7 hours in most use cases. That's just an unacceptable regression done in the name of vanity.
 
How long until the first app is made that only runs ads on the touchbar? Or the first malware that doesn't do anything malicious on disk but puts ads or bad links on the touchbar?
[doublepost=1479144727][/doublepost]
I know. Maybe it's because I'm a millennial, but I just find it rather odd we're using fax machines.
Currently it's about the only thing that meets the current (in US) legal standard for an e-signature for anything legal or health related. Once the laws change to allow other forms of e-signature you'll find faxing to rapidly disappear. You'd be surprised by the millions of daily faxes required by hospitals/physicians/insurance/government/legal entities.
 
If "little used" is an indication of where to put a touch bar:

Next up: Touch bar extended to Caps Lock!
Then the right command and option key.
Then the tilde key
Then the letter j

:)
I like that idea (but not specifically the letter j).

With haptic feedback, the entire keyboard could be a touch-screen. It could adjust for any international layout, or a number pad, or a color picker, depending on the context. There doesn't need to be any distinction between the keyboard and the touchpad.
 
Not really. They would then face the same challenge of making pointer device work for a primarily touch-oriented platform. Either way, the challenge is there and there is no way to avoid it. Either come out with a platform that works for key, pointer and touch or accept a compromise and a lesser user experience. Microsoft has taken on that challenge and it's true that they've stumbled and doesn't have a whole lot to show for at this moment but they're on the right path. The same cannot be said of Apple. The new MacBook Pro feels like a product in an eternal limbo, unsure if it wants to embrace a new type of input or steadfastly stick to the old and known.

You're right. Apple needs to add support for input devices for iPad and they've already taken some steps with the Smart Keyboard and Apple Pencil.

PCs/ Macs are in decline and despite MS's best efforts, you're not seeing users and developers flocking to PCs.

If people are questioning whether Apple has lost its focus, these developments should tell them that they're still laser focused on the future as they have been for most of their existence.

I liken this to the Apple II to Mac transition. A bit painful for some, but inevitable nonetheless.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.