The average user is a either a fabrication or a secret SI unit. Seriously, users are not equal.
I 100% agree.
Something every user (from the mythical average user to the marketingspeak Power User) comes by:
Windows default font (Segoe) is a bad choice. It is too thin for the UI and gets even worse because ClearType is lighter than OS X anti-aliasing. Because of this, every character seems to have a red halo around it.
Are you serious? You're going to complain about a font? I have never, ever, in my entire life ever heard anyone complain about any font on any operating system. This cannot be taken seriously.
Easier to set up
Each user has its own criteria for what's easier to set up. Safari is still better a default browser compared to Internet Explorer.
Debatable. I use FF and IE 6.x all the time...I really don't have a favorite. I've used Safari (only on my Mini) and frankly I didn't like it...so installed FF. Every browser has it's performance and rendering kudos/challenges...it has since 1995.
Cooler
Some users find OSX cooler, some find Windows cooler, some find Linux cooler and there's that OS/2 dude don't talk to him, he's probably on a 10 mile restraint order from anyone. The idea that Mac users find themselves cooler/hip is partly true, partly a misinterpretation of the I'm a Mac ads, and partly a construction of snarky Microsoft fanboys.
I think people like displaying their Apple logo on their laptops, coffee mugs, and those stickers Apple gives you to put on your car window.
Easier to use
Finder vs. Windows Explorer
I don't use Finder enough...Windows Explorer is not the best thing in the world. However, it does what it's designed to do...allow you to traverse your hard drive...whether or not you know where your files are or not. I agree that the Search sucks (the DIR command in DOS is 10x faster than Windows Search) but I use Google Desktop for all my searching. This Finder vs. WE argument is weak at best.
Never have problems
Every device has problems. Clean installed, Windows is a great OS. Then it starts getting bloated and bloated as the user installs new software and drivers. This is mostly because Windows developers still carry the same mindset from Windows 95.
You are right...nothing lasts forever. But who is installing "drivers" these days? This isn't WFWG 3.11 or Win95. Everything I've plugged into my XP boxes over the past 8 years has either self-installed or simply prompted me for the cd and it did it. This "device driver" scare tactic is 15 years old. I do agree that the more software you install, the more the OS generally slows down on boot and shutdown...and depending on exactly what you are installing (antivirus for example), they may affect the performance WHILE Windows is running. But installing 10-15 common apps (MS Office, Adobe Acrobat, Firefox, AOL IM, iTunes, dvd/cd authoring/ripping tools, a few games, etc) is not going to "bloat" the system. If you are an idiot and install every single free popup, IE toolbar, screensaver, game, utility to mankind, yes, it's going to slow down.
