Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Good. They NEED to update MobileMe YESTERDAY. It's too expensive, and too wonky. I am constantly on their sub-par chat "help" trying to fix the constant bugs and nits that constantly crop up.

Take a page from DropBox, why dontcha?

Unfortunately, my email has got me hooked :(

Don't get me wrong, the IDEA of MobileMe is fabulous. And if it worked correctly, it would be well worth the money. As of now, though, it's running at about 60%.
 
I like the idea but the cost always threw me off if its free and they can expand on what i hear is a half finished product then i can see it as a good idea.

Knowing :apple: i can beleve that they will turn this into what itunes is now or maybe they can lighten the load that itunes now bears as to me its to bloated and can do with going on a diet.

But if its free i will give it a go and try it as with :apple: devices we all had to take a leap of faith at some point and we dont regret our decision in trusting :apple: :cool:
 
So this is how Apple will be able to put SSD flash storage in the MBP. 128gb flash to keep price points the same, while allowing everyone to store everything in the cloud. It eliminates the need for massive storage on the device.

NO, I want SSD for FAST access of my data - going to the cloud will make it slower than ever. I actually have upgraded my MacBook to SSD and things like iPhoto and iTunes load now insanely fast (especially iPhoto was unusable before because of all the DATA).
 
But aren't you also charging then? I'm guessing if you're listening to podcasts on a daily basis you're having to charge once a day anyway? Just curious.

I charge my iPhone on a thing that is called "Power Outlet" ... I can't and don't want to connect it always to my Machine. I need flexibility to where I charge the phone (office/home/vacation/ ....) - I don't want always to carry my computer with me just to charge my phone - I don't mind carrying the small adapter for the power outlet.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

Lol. I've never heard this one before..
 
Good. They NEED to update MobileMe YESTERDAY. It's too expensive, and too wonky. I am constantly on their sub-par chat "help" trying to fix the constant bugs and nits that constantly crop up.

+1
My iCal / MobileMe Calendar has 173,654 events in it.. dating back to 1947!
Ever since I became a MobileMe user, e-mail, iDisk, Contacts, all work fine... My Calendar is totally eff'd up.

The help-chat has been of little help... I have had 4 chats with them myself... no help.
iCal Cleaner can determine the number of events.... but after running it for 4 straight days, it barely makes a dent !!!
I've decided to clean up the mess manually... (anyone have any suggestions?)

YES, MobileMe needs some help... especially with Calendar, imho....
I'm just glad to hear that SOMETHING is going to happen with it !!
 
Here's the thing:

Wireless (WiFi) syncing, as it turns out, is one of those things that is Really Hard to Do Right™. (3G may be, paradoxically, easier.) I'd know; I helped write the Mac side of the best WiFi sync solution for Android. Apple has a reputation for It Just Works™, which frankly isn't compatible with WiFi sync strictly on the phone and desktop side.

Why is that, you ask? It boils down to 3 core issues: the phone, the computer, and the WiFi router. Now, Apple has full control of the phone, so they can eliminate those problems up front. But Apple does not have full control of the computer - remember, there's iTunes for Windows too - and there are thousands of WiFi access points which are not AirPorts. The problems fall into these categories:

1. Discoverability - PITA. Bonjour works well... as long as Windows users have Bonjour turned on, and the AP deals with multicast packets properly. The odds of both of these being the case are surprisingly low. We resorted to scanning your subnet if Bonjour fails, and have manual IP address entry as a last resort. Very un-Apple.

2. Connectivity - certain network configurations are extremely hostile to WiFi sync - Starbucks and about 70% of other hotspots, corporate networks, and certain large universities *cough*UCF*cough* *cough*total jerks*cough* actually have network policies prohibiting even standard unicast communication between two WiFi devices, or a WiFi and a hardwired device. Apple is not going to release something that doesn't work everywhere.

Once you get past these, actually doing WiFi sync has it's own set of problems related to network connections being flaky, devices going away, but most of those are solvable, and some have solutions right out of USB sync - ie, what to do if someone yanks the device mid-sync. The point is, it's not a trivial thing, going from USB sync to WiFi sync. It's not a matter of just cutting the cord.

The reason that syncing over 3G/internet, though very data-intensive for both the user and company, is easier, is that you can guarantee a minimum network connection from the computer to the sync server and the sync server to the phone. It will have its own set of problems, but discoverability and connectivity are not among them.
 
i want both local data storage and wireless synch - but not excluding one or the other
 
In my opinion, Apple would never allow a user to stream anything other than their media purchases from Apple; any ripped or otherwise non-Apple originated media is strictly limited to local machines. Way too many copyright issues and Apple doesn't want that headache. Why is there continued speculation that Apple will allow users to upload their libraries to the cloud?
 
Here's the thing:

Wireless (WiFi) syncing, as it turns out, is one of those things that is Really Hard to Do Right™. (3G may be, paradoxically, easier.) I'd know; I helped write the Mac side of the best WiFi sync solution for Android. Apple has a reputation for It Just Works™, which frankly isn't compatible with WiFi sync strictly on the phone and desktop side.

Why is that, you ask? It boils down to 3 core issues: the phone, the computer, and the WiFi router. Now, Apple has full control of the phone, so they can eliminate those problems up front. But Apple does not have full control of the computer - remember, there's iTunes for Windows too - and there are thousands of WiFi access points which are not AirPorts. The problems fall into these categories:

1. Discoverability - PITA. Bonjour works well... as long as Windows users have Bonjour turned on, and the AP deals with multicast packets properly. The odds of both of these being the case are surprisingly low. We resorted to scanning your subnet if Bonjour fails, and have manual IP address entry as a last resort. Very un-Apple.

2. Connectivity - certain network configurations are extremely hostile to WiFi sync - Starbucks and about 70% of other hotspots, corporate networks, and certain large universities *cough*UCF*cough* *cough*total jerks*cough* actually have network policies prohibiting even standard unicast communication between two WiFi devices, or a WiFi and a hardwired device. Apple is not going to release something that doesn't work everywhere.

Once you get past these, actually doing WiFi sync has it's own set of problems related to network connections being flaky, devices going away, but most of those are solvable, and some have solutions right out of USB sync - ie, what to do if someone yanks the device mid-sync. The point is, it's not a trivial thing, going from USB sync to WiFi sync. It's not a matter of just cutting the cord.

The reason that syncing over 3G/internet, though very data-intensive for both the user and company, is easier, is that you can guarantee a minimum network connection from the computer to the sync server and the sync server to the phone. It will have its own set of problems, but discoverability and connectivity are not among them.
I'm trying to figure out why it's so hard for Apple to implement this over WiFi?

MS already figured it out for WP7 and their Zune desktop on a home network.
WiFi sync happens on your home network during idle time while charging (power outlet, not plugged into PC) or you can kick it off manually if you want to.
Works like a dream.

Doing this over 3G or a WiFi hotspot (Starbuck's, McD's, etc.) would require exposing my PC to sync commands from the outside world.... no thanks.

Pushing it up to a cloud service shouldn't be too hard, although file size may be an issue for 3G.
 
I'm trying to figure out why it's so hard for Apple to implement this over WiFi?

MS already figured it out for WP7 and their Zune desktop on a home network.
WiFi sync happens on your home network during idle time while charging (power outlet, not plugged into PC) or you can kick it off manually if you want to.
Works like a dream.

Doing this over 3G or a WiFi hotspot (Starbuck's, McD's, etc.) would require exposing my PC to sync commands from the outside world.... no thanks.

Pushing it up to a cloud service shouldn't be too hard, although file size may be an issue for 3G.

I can guarantee you Zune wifi sync doesn't work at UCF though. Apple won't abide that.
 
I can guarantee you Zune wifi sync doesn't work at UCF though. Apple won't abide that.
Forgive my ignorance but... "UCF"?

If you're referring to my iTunes music library... Zune desktop picks it up at the folder level.
I simply point it to my iTunes music library folder and viola, all my music is on my phone.
 
Ugh.

Ugh. I don't like this at all. I want local storage. Wireless access is NOT always available. WiFi and Cel are not universal options. Bad idea.
 
Forgive my ignorance but... "UCF"?

If you're referring to my iTunes music library... Zune desktop picks it up at the folder level.
I simply point it to my iTunes music library folder and viola, all my music is on my phone.

University of Central Florida, one of the largest undergrad universities, with 58,000 people squarely in Apple's target demographic. They have network policies that make Egypt look reasonable.
 
University of Central Florida, one of the largest undergrad universities, with 58,000 people squarely in Apple's target demographic. They have network policies that make Egypt look reasonable.
Ahh yes... I remember reading many complaints about their network policies.
Insane control freaks.
 
Ugh. I don't like this at all. I want local storage. Wireless access is NOT always available. WiFi and Cel are not universal options. Bad idea.

What makes you think that this is supposed to replace local storage? This service would definitely be in addition to the local storage you have on your device itself.
 
What makes you think that this is supposed to replace local storage? This service would definitely be in addition to the local storage you have on your device itself.

Isn't that what happened to the Apple TV, and isn't there a rumour on the front page about the iPhone Nano having no onboard storage and being totally cloud based. It's a possibility, just one I hope doesn't come to pass.
 
I charge my iPhone on a thing that is called "Power Outlet" ... I can't and don't want to connect it always to my Machine. I need flexibility to where I charge the phone (office/home/vacation/ ....) - I don't want always to carry my computer with me just to charge my phone - I don't mind carrying the small adapter for the power outlet.

Yes, I'm not denying we need an alternative means of charging than via the sync cable, I'm saying that lots of people are getting excited about wireless syncing doing away with the need to connect their phone to their Mac/PC, but my point is surely if you're not going to sync with the cable, you're still going to have to plug your device in to to either a computer or wall socket to charge, so you're not saving any effort.

In other words, if I'm currently plugging in my iPhone once a day (to my Mac), if wireless syncing comes along I'm still going to need to plug it in to either my Mac or a wall socket once a day so I'm no better off.
 
Isn't that what happened to the Apple TV, and isn't there a rumour on the front page about the iPhone Nano having no onboard storage and being totally cloud based. It's a possibility, just one I hope doesn't come to pass.

Well the appletv is totally different category of device, it's always in your house, it's never mobile. But I hear what you're saying. Regarding the iphone nano, I could totally believe that they would go with a limited storage device + online streaming, but again, that would just be for that special type of device. For at least the next 5 years Apple will be offering mobile devices that have onboard storage. So no worries.
 
I can guarantee you Zune wifi sync doesn't work at UCF though. Apple won't abide that.
Nor would you want it to or have it be on any large network for that matter. I sure wouldn't want anyone having access to my library. Heck, I locked mine down when I was in school years ago. The things you could access on other tech ignorant people's computers was scary and unfortunately that was most of them.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.