Originally posted by rjstanford
Its just very hard to justify a new powerbook, especially as a business purchase, when in almost all other respects (such as hardware) they continue to lag behind their competitors.
-Richard
If this version of the processor WAS using Rapid I/O as the FSB people would be jumping up and down in joy.Originally posted by singletrack
I can't see Apple using it anymore, not because of speed issues, as Moto should be able to ramp up the speed more now they are on 0.13, but more because it still uses RapidIO and doesn't support DDR yet when Apple are heading HyperTransport and full on DDR with the G5. Still, it's impressive power/heat wise and would do ok in a future iBook if it wasn't for IBM's Moave 750VX on the horizon and Motorola's prior history.
Originally posted by ariza910
How can you change the keyboard to the back lit version?
Originally posted by cybermat
Anyway, I will probably be bugging you guys later on when I need help using OSX. Please be gentle on me
Originally posted by Hugin777
Sorry, english is not my primary language![]()
When you order the PBook you can choose to pay extra to get the back lit version. I don't know whether it's possible to exchange the keyboard for a back lit model later on...
Originally posted by Tiauguinho
Completly agree with you. It might have 512k Cache L2 but the L3 gives a push too. They should add at least 1MB of L3. Oh well.
Well, this is a portable thread, and they are the machine of choice if you only want one. Hmm. Only in raw speed? Actually, they're falling further behind with their screens as well, which is a pity since they used to be so nice (they're not worse, just the same, and the rest of the industry has evolved). Definately lacking in DPI these days, and not providing much of a choice about it either They are doing very well in software, and in higher-end desktops, just not so well in portable hardware.Originally posted by greenstork
Hardware is perhaps the ONLY respect that Apple lags behind and then even, ONLY in their portables, and then even, ONLY in raw speed. Design, ease of use, functionality, and portability, durability, etc., Apple excels... significantly.
Just for the record, mostly I was responding to people who were claiming one of those two things.Originally posted by greenstork
I've been listening to your arguements all through this thread and I tend to agree that Apple does not have the fastest laptops, or the cheapest.
Interestingly enough, viruses, etc, have never been much of an issue with a decent firewall and some common-sense security settings (outlook = restricted zone, don't run random programs).However, if you honestly believe that the extra $500 you would pay for a Mac or slightly slower computer won't be drastically made up for in productivity and ease of use of OS X (not to mention the time you save eradicating viruses from your Wintel machine) in order to justify your business purchase, perhaps an Apple isn't for you.
Originally posted by rjstanford
Ease of use? Well... I'd say that they're a little behind there (no choice of pointing device, no second mouse button, and a big one - no seperate delete/backspace key).
Functionality - they have nothing other than 2 pins of that 6-pin Firewire connector that their competitors don't. Then again, their competitors have nothing except smart-card readers and infrared that Apple don't. I don't care about firewire or smartcards, I like the infrared port but could get a USB adapter. Almost a tie, with (for me) Apple a couple of points behind.
Portability? Weight, etc, is pretty much the same between Apple and its competitors.
Originally posted by Sun Baked
If this version of the processor WAS using Rapid I/O as the FSB people would be jumping up and down in joy.
But it still uses the same bus as the rest of the 74xx processors.
Just like infrared and smartcard readers don't matter to you. Its all relative.Originally posted by greenstork
I guess we'll just have to disagree on this one. Even my PC friends agree that the Mac is far easier to use and just because you don't use firewire doesn't mean that it's not more functional. On the whole it is... it just doesn't matter to you.
Er, that's all software. Which I said that OSX was better at. Although, I can do all of those things very easily with my XP machine as well, quite frankly. As for the security patches, both Apple and Microsoft have their update services, running either system without the updates is not a great idea.How about opening up your laptop on a wireless PC network and just having your Mac see all the other PC's on the network, and other macs too. How functional is that? Or networking your whole Mac office, then turning all the computers on, and it just works without any configuration. How functional is that? Or how about zero viruses for OS X and never having to worry about a security patch. Or connecting to my home mac from work with a simple IP address. Or turning my mac into an FTP server or an Apache web server, how functional is that?
Yeah, I was responding specifically to your comment, "Hardware is perhaps the ONLY respect that Apple lags behind and then even, ONLY in their portables, and then even, ONLY in raw speed." if you check the thread.Mac is so much more than hardware and believe me I never made the claim that it was all about the hardware, that was others you refuted on this thread. I made the claim that the whole package is worth so much more, significantly more, than the extra $500 for the Mac and the slightly slower speed.
Originally posted by jade
...
For raw speed maybe a pc is faster (but I can definitely vouch that a g4 is far fasted than an equivalent pentium chip)
...
The price difference really isn't as large as you think.
Originally posted by rjstanford
Just like infrared and smartcard readers don't matter to you. Its all relative.
Yeah, I was responding specifically to your comment, "Hardware is perhaps the ONLY respect that Apple lags behind and then even, ONLY in their portables, and then even, ONLY in raw speed." if you check the thread.
-Richard
Originally posted by cybermat
Hey Guys,
I am officially switching from the PC world to the Mac world. Woohoo.. ordered my Powerbook 1.25Ghz superdrive this morning. I also ordered the Ipod with it (educational discount + 300CDN rebate).. too sweet of a deal.
Anyway, I will probably be bugging you guys later on when I need help using OSX. Please be gentle on me
Thanks for your attention.
Originally posted by rjstanford
Ease of use? Well... I'd say that they're a little behind there (no choice of pointing device, no second mouse button, and a big one - no seperate delete/backspace key).
Originally posted by rjstanford
[BFunctionality - they have nothing other than 2 pins of that 6-pin Firewire connector that their competitors don't. Then again, their competitors have nothing except smart-card readers and infrared that Apple don't. I don't care about firewire or smartcards, I like the infrared port but could get a USB adapter. Almost a tie, with (for me) Apple a couple of points behind.[/B]
I like Macs, indeed I've bought 2 12" powerbook for other people (who have different needs than I do). I enjoy using OSX for the most part. I wanted to see if Apple would produce a powerbook that met my needs, as they did with the powermac. That doesn't mean that I think that all Macs are holy, or worth spending any amount of money on. If I can get a Dell that's eq. to the powerbook for $1,000 less (and I did), then that's a better deal, although not as much of a better deal as it was 24 hours ago. I realize better now that its heresy to think that Apple may not have done everything perfectly...Originally posted by greenstork
Hey, I'm just curious and I really don't want you to take this the wrong way because I truly don't mean it to sound rude at all, but why are you here? You own a Dell and don't seem to see any real value in OS X. What prompted you to think about a Mac in the first place?
Argh. Mouse with a laptop? I'd rather not. Although it is amusing watching people trying to balance a laptop and a mouse on an airport tray... but not for me, thank you. I prefer the self-contained portability that is a laptop.Originally posted by singletrack
I've not come across a single laptop that comes with a mouse. If you want a two button scroll mouse, go buy one - I did. Plugged it in, it worked with no extra software.
It always bugs me for some reason. Guess its what you're used to.No delete key? Possibly. I missed it for about 2 weeks switching, now I don't notice it at all. I notice the silly transposition of quote and @ more and that there's no hash key on an iBook - it's Option-3.
Actually, we're on GSM now, so that's evened up. And even the crappy Dells have bluetooth in 'em. Nah, the infrared is for my running heart-rate/position gizmo to interface without cables (like I said, it matters a little to me but not a lot).Who the hell uses Infrared? Sorry, but after years of balancing mobile phones on my lap at just the right angle and peering over the top of my Toshiba screen to make sure the phone was lined up, getting Bluetooth on my iBook and a Nokia 6310i and now a Sony Ericsson T610 makes infrared obsolete. I know you're mobile phone poor in the USA unlike Europe but really - Infrared? That's sooo 90's.
Agreed, and I don't care about it - but I don't care about the extra 2 pins on the firewire connector, either. My original point was that they were damn near identical, where it was claimed that apple was significantly ahead in that area.Card adaptors - you can get USB card adaptors and they often support multiple card types whereas built in slots of PC Card adaptors don't.
Agreed -- but when its significantly cheaper and faster? Why do you think this thread got so many negative votes?But at the end of the day, most Mac users couldn't give a stuff if a Dell is cheaper or marginally faster. That's entirely missing the point.
Originally posted by rjstanford
I'd have a dual G5 desktop now, as a matter of fact, if they had got their supply strategy sorted out. That machine I see as good, justifiable value for money.