Re: Have to discount the PDF
Originally posted by Sayer
The PDF draws the ports on the back very close together (non-proportional maybe).
On the red eBay motherboard there was a mystery port between FireWire and the Ethernet port and a gap between the audio ports again.
So unless the drawing is not to scale/proprortion of what really is, there should be some gaps between ports AND either a mystery port or a gap where one USED TO BE.
Its unfortunate that Apple, if this is all accurate, constantly witholds technology for various reasons. Apple created FireWire for pete's sake, why not add the next gen of it and let it be adopted like they did for USB?
At some point I must justify the higher costs of buying a Mac using 3-4 year old technology. If Apple doesn't move forward on 50% of what its selling technology-wise what is the point in upgradin to get simply a fast CPU?
The new G4 should AT LEAST have ATA/133, DDR RAM, new bus/controller and a newer design of G4 not just a speed bumped 7455. This new G4 looks like a rehashing of the current QuickSilver. Whoopee.
AirPort can be upgraded and should have been by now both in the underlying hardware and speed/features.
FireWire 2 should definately be possible, Apple should know above all else how to implement it.
Apple actually increased its cash to 4.3 billion - BILLION - even after buying a dozen companies the past year plus. Innovate on the hardware AND software Apple. I cant download a new FireWire port or faster ATA!
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Well... actually, I have. I've been saying this stuff for awhile. But anyway, point being I WANT A BETTER COMPUTER.
I am about to buy a new computer. I don't want another Wintel. AMD notwithstanding, WINDOWS SUX. I have a cheapy with Win98, but having played with XP, don't get me started. I want OS X.
But I want current technology. DDR-Ram is nice. If it can speed up a Celeron (we tested a MotherBoard with both DDR and SD-Ram. Trust me, DDR is better, and not that much more expensive for what you get), it can give the G4 the speed it needs. Look at the xServe, even if the DDR is bastardized, it still gives it a boost.
And ATA/133 is a must, even though I know we'll be lucky to get ATA/100. Don't give me that tired old argument that ATA/66 is all you'll ever need. ATA/100 is faster enough to justify. Do they even make ATA/66 Drives anymore? Besides, how am I supposed to access newer drives over 128-137 GB? You have to have ATA/133.
I want one of those Western Digital 200 GB Drive that they just announced. ATA/133 only. I'll have to buy a PCI card, but that proves they could implement it on the MotherBoard. How many ATA/133 Cards do they have out there now? I guess they just want you to buy new computers every year (well, they are a business).
I do digital video, so I need all the speed I can get. But if I'm spending $3000+ for a computer, I expect it to have today's technology. I shouldn't have to spend more to fill up precious PCI slots for TODAY's technology, most of it standard. It's not like I'm asking for onboard SCSI or anything (can't afford thousands of $$$ just for the drives). I'm not even asking for RAID implementation, just a better IDE. Sheesh!
So who cares about what it looks like on the outside. Make it biege for all I care (no, wait... don't do that after all), but make it state-of-the-art INSIDE. FW 2 not being in there yet I can see, and no USB 2 to compete with FW 1, but at least use TODAY's stuff. Case, shmase, WHAT'S INSIDE? You want us to pay PRO prices, give us PRO machines.
P.S. groove, don't worry about it. If this is the real deal, he didn't have much to tell us that we couldn't have seen somewhere else anyway. And that comment about never posting again reminded me of that whole "well, if you don't do things my way, I'm taking my ball and going home" thing. If he had anything good to say, he wouldn't have been so offended so easily. "Put up, or shut up" I say. Like he was doing us a favor or anything (okay, well, he might have been, but still).
The guy doesn't even know how to attach an image (sorry, but the more I think about it, what the guy said really pisses me off. To get so mad over something that wasn't even that rude). He hasn't even proven himself yet (I've checked his other posts, nothing much). You want to prove yourself to be real, stand up for yourself and post something good for pete's sake. Don't just p*ssy out and blame someone who hurt your "wittle feewings" (sic - BTW).
There, now I've really pissed him off.
But I hope the cases don't look like this (and I don't think they will). We'll see in a few weeks.
[Sorry, but I'm in a bad mood, my parents came up this weekend]