I'm referring to tax payers. I thought that BBC was subsidized like in Canada. But, based on what you're saying, BBC has monetized their operations through licensing. My apologies.
Therefore the BBC feed that we have playing on our Canadian cable is paid for by my monthly cable fee. Which offsets the cost of the BBC operations. That's great then...that's how it should be done. So essentially the BBC is paid for by the cable operators, or specialty channels that play Jamie Oliver reruns. Got it.
So is the BBC essentially a self-sustaining, profitable Crown Corp? If so, I hope the CBC moves into the same direction.
Pretty much.
The funding is controlled via the BBC Trust who overlook and make sure everybody are hitting the margins on which they are set out.
A good example is Radio 1.. for a while (until late 2011) it was a great station, the formatting was perfect, the talent was unbelievable. But, they weren't hitting the plan that they set out to be, of which the trust is set to over watch. So after the trust 'removed' a few of the controllers at Radio 1 for not hitting the TSA and formatting the station sound to fit their brief, they finally got a journalist who's now the controller and has managed to bring the TSA age down, but to do that he's destroyed Radio 1. The shows are awful, full of 'Youtube famous' kids presenting programs, the playlist on a whole has turned ignorant and the celebrities that they include on programming are the likes of One Direction. People shifted to Radio 2 & 4.. and to show it the Radio 1 breakfast show (one of the most iconic features of Radio 1) has yet again lost just short of 1 million listeners. It's gone from 9million + to 3/4 million since the change. There's no surprise Zane moved, it was probably only time before Ben Cooper (controller) had him zapped from the lineup.. now he can carry on doing what he does best at a medium platform that isn't in self destruct mode, but also supports his theory.