This seems like a gross oversimplification on several fronts. Without trying to count them out, I'd guess that Apple has just as many product models in their lineup today as they did when Sculley left in 1993. Jobs did more than simply reduce the product line when he returned (which, we should remember, was four years after Sculley's departure). For one, he killed off products that weren't making money and refocused the company's limited resources on core products. The real turning point was the iMac, in 1998. When resources were not so limited, he branched the company out into more and more product lines. That famous product matrix lasted maybe three years, tops. Nobody ever announced that the matrix was dead; it just vanished when it wasn't of use any longer.
In some ways Cook repurposed it for Apple's org structure. Now you basically have four core leaders instead of some of the divisional leadership that was under Jobs (like Rubinstein and then Fadell leading the iPod division, iOS and OS X/Mac with separate leaders, ect.). It's hard to have fiefdoms now because every leader pretty much has involvement with every product/service in some way.
I'm not sure how you think this refutes my point. Are you saying that Sculley used an effective strategy that simply became no longer effective? Because I have to strongly disagree. He mis-managed Apple because he didn't have the tools for that industry. My point is that being a successful decision maker in one industry does not mean that you can move to a new industry and be successful. Sculley was a great CEO at Pepsi and sucked at Apple.
Sorry, but I just can't be fooled this way.
The Matrix, reloaded?
If you bothered to read my entire post I specifically stated that he deserved it after all these years. It was Jobs with Ive that got Apple back on track.
Clearly the most qualified person for that job![]()
I didn't say anything about Sculley's strategy, or his success, or lack thereof. I am simply saying that the point about him taking a "soft drink" approach to Apple's product line that was so utterly different than the Jobs approach is difficult to support by the facts. Jobs pared down Apple's product line when it suited his purposes, then expanded it again, when that suited his purposes. I also would not make the argument that this initial paring down was directly connected to Apple's resurgence. What really mattered was filling those matrix boxes with appealing products.
Fair enough. Then let me propose another case study that is much less complex and open to interpretation and more on point.
Ron Johnson, hugely successful with Apple stores takes his ideas to Penney's where they totally fail because retail clothing is nothing like technology retail. His approach fails because what seems logical to him given his experience leads him astray. The same could be said of John Browett when he came on board, although that was a train wreck that almost everyone saw coming a mile away.
I sincerely hope that Angela is able to make positive changes, because I believe it is inherently risky to bring someone to a new industry and expect them to make good decisions.
Fair enough. Then let me propose another case study that is much less complex and open to interpretation and more on point.
Ron Johnson, hugely successful with Apple stores takes his ideas to Penney's where they totally fail because retail clothing is nothing like technology retail. His approach fails because what seems logical to him given his experience leads him astray. The same could be said of John Browett when he came on board, although that was a train wreck that almost everyone saw coming a mile away.
I sincerely hope that Angela is able to make positive changes, because I believe it is inherently risky to bring someone to a new industry and expect them to make good decisions.
Has the leadership team ever had an African American ? Wonder when one will come along if ever .
Couldn't agree more. I think this has more to do with apple trying to meet a census and putting a somewhat established woman in a executive roll. I don't see her lasting long at all.
SVP ≠ EVP. So, what are YOU talking about?
executive vp ≠ senior vp...!
she really has beautiful eyes![]()
What exactly is wrong with the shopping experience? I hope she doesn't make it all girly. Steve Jobs was definitely on the manly side of taste.
I'm not sure how you think this refutes my point. Are you saying that Sculley used an effective strategy that simply became no longer effective? Because I have to strongly disagree. He mis-managed Apple because he didn't have the tools for that industry. My point is that being a successful decision maker in one industry does not mean that you can move to a new industry and be successful. Sculley was a great CEO at Pepsi and sucked at Apple.
This however is a common myth supported in academia and other circles. That is once you have your business management degree you can run any business in the world. It is also a thought held by many in the executive ranks, especially in the USA. This is frankly why so many American companies have so many issues with sustaining themselves and innovation. If you as a manager don't have a clue about the technology you are about to manage you have zero chance of success.
Fair enough. Then let me propose another case study that is much less complex and open to interpretation and more on point.
Ron Johnson, hugely successful with Apple stores takes his ideas to Penney's where they totally fail because retail clothing is nothing like technology retail. His approach fails because what seems logical to him given his experience leads him astray. The same could be said of John Browett when he came on board, although that was a train wreck that almost everyone saw coming a mile away.
I sincerely hope that Angela is able to make positive changes, because I believe it is inherently risky to bring someone to a new industry and expect them to make good decisions.
Except that Johnson was incredibly successful at Target with the same basic strategy that he tried to use at Penney's and the same basic strategy that he used at Apple. Sometimes forces outside of your control (like a chicken ***** board of directors at Penney's) come into play.
She reminds me also of JK Rowling
He's the only person not smiling....
I hope they fix the process of getting a defective (undamaged) Lightning cable replaced. I brought mine in to the Natick, MA Apple Store yesterday and here's how it went:
Met by a greeter/concierge, who directed me to another Apple employee. He gave me a replacement alright...and proceeded to try and charge me $20 and change. I simulated the defect within the cable and stated it was under a year old. He sent me over to another employee, who wanted me to simulate it again, and finally sent me over to Jake (from Statefarm). Jake gave me a replacement at no charge and out the door I went.
That's FOUR employees, in a span of 10 minutes, I had to go through for a simple replacement. Obviously 10 minutes isn't a long time, but does it have to take four employees to make it happen???
And the Natick store is a very good one. They are very busy there, much busier than the one at Legacy Place in Dedham. I have found them to be very helpful and if they can't answer the question or don't know how to do what you want, they find the person that can.