Agreed, I think spilt screen/multitasking is a must.
If the 5,5" iPhone 6 has a 2,915 mAh capacity, I don't believe the 4,7" will have just 1,800 mAh.
From the iPhone 5s (4") to the 4,7" iPhone 6 the just will be only about 0,300 mAh, "reports claim". We are talking about 0,300 mAh for a 0,7" screen size bump.
For the 5,5", "reports claim" a bump about 1,1mAh for a 0,8" screen size bump (4,7" -> 5,5"). That doesn't make much sense.
Like how they alienated a lot of customers by making a 5S with better specs than the 5C?
So how will you notice this "inferiority" on a daily basis, unless you have someone with a 5.5" iPhone following you around so that you can constantly compare how that phone performs better?
Either the 4.7" model will perform according to your needs, or it won't. It will not perform any worse just because there is a "better" model on the market.
Let's hope that they pull some sort of efficiency tricks from their sleeve as well as increasing battery capacity, which would give us a two-fold boost in battery life.
Not because of the practicality of it, but purely so we can wipe that "wall-hugger" smug grin off Samsung's face haha![]()
Its the image stabilisation rumour that is annoying me, why should the bigger phone get the fancy optical image stabilisation tech where the 4.7 which could no doubt easily fit it gets it left out, it has nothing to do with screen size or productivity its just greed if thats the case.
the point is portability, which is a huge deal for a portable device you keep with you 24/7 to remain connected to the world and a main factor, not just an exception.
"iPhone 6" is a lot easier to remember and to use than "iPhone 8th generation" or "iPhone late 2014 model". Even more so if there's 2 sizes available.the iPhone 6 (god I hope they drop the number this time round)
Because it fits in the larger but does not fit in the smaller? Because Apple can't get enough of them for both models? Because they want something to differentiate the models further?
You cant possably achive useful user interface on a screen than small.
Lol everyone is different, true but a 5.5" smartphone fits in my pocket.
An iPad Mini doesn't.
We are having different conversations.
Lol everyone is different, true but a 5.5" smartphone fits in my pocket.
An iPad Mini doesn't.
We are having different conversations.
you want your big screen with you all the time, I only want it with me on rare occasions and to not be burdened with it other times. Most of the time i am don't have my ipad with me, and don't do anything that makes me want the bigger screen. I just don't use my phone in a way that makes me want to carry something as big as I can fit in my pocket.
It makes sense because the 4.7" iPhone 6 is thin, and if you ask Jony Ive thin is the only thing that matters in a product nowadays, even an iMac which sits on a 6" deep stand must be thin, who needs battery life!![]()
I don't use it often but one of those features that's just nice to have.Don't know why so many people are opposing the introduction of split screen multi-tasking. If you wouldn't use it then it wouldn't affect you whether it was built into iOS or not.
Bring it on I say!
Hey no need for that, I didn't say I use it all the time just a feature that nice to know you have.Well, than thanks god it doesnt depend on you. Split screen on a phone is no sense. You cant possably achive useful user interface on a screen than small. iOS already have multitasking and it works fine. You can do many things at the same time, but you only see one app on the screen. Even on the iPad is no sense. Splitscreen and multiscreen is nice when you are working in your office, and you have all your documents open at the same time and that is the only time when it is actually useful, because the extra screen space is allwoing you to make fast reference and information checks. You can overlook various proceses at the same time. It let you have faster workflow. Splitscreen is desktop feature that is useful only when you sufficient screen side. On a phone or tablet, there is not space, not for my eyes at least.
I know that you will say that its just me, and everybody else are multitasking ans splitscreening all the time, but the real world use shows the opposite. While people are texting they normaly pause their video player and dont watch it side by side. While people a typing email, they dont watch slideshow of their photos on the other side of the screen.
Improve cross-app data sharing, faster swtich between apps, improve interface of the apps, thats what is needed, not the stupid split screen.
Just my opinion....
Not everyone has the same opinion on what size is comfortable to carry. Hence why there are 4-5 different screen sizes for laptops.It's a complete non-issue as long as you can comfortably bring it along anywhere you go. And as hundreds of millions of customers tell us, a large screened phone comes along just fine.
Hopefully optimization will be good but at the end of the day, if you're using the phone you're lighting a screen, which is ultimately what kills the battery life faster than anything else.