Hopefully this means the end of the white case. I'd love to see an aluminum case. But even more I'd love to see a new non-white keyboard that didn't show dirt after a week.
I agree, touchscreens can be useful. I find a lot of people who post here have the mentality of "If I don't need xyz feature, why does anyone else?" It really pisses me off. Why do so many people think everyone is just like them?
OK, here is a question for all of you would be designers. Would you rather have the trademark "chin" or a power brick? Personally, I would rather have the brick.
Gimme a iMac with a decent video card and I might actually buy one.
![]()
Maybe the new iMac's would look like this, with a power brick? No chin, and slimmer?
![]()
Maybe the new iMac's would look like this, with a power brick? No chin, and slimmer?
![]()
Maybe the new iMac's would look like this, with a power brick? No chin, and slimmer?
![]()
I like those, That would be a good deal. The only 1 suggestion I would add would be 3 USB ports, and 1 Firewire 400 port on the front of the bottom base.
Maybe the new iMac's would look like this, with a power brick? No chin, and slimmer?
Maybe the new iMac's would look like this, with a power brick? No chin, and slimmer?
![]()
Excuse me, but isn't this next one actually the 3rd revision and not the 4th. I do not consider the Original iMac to be a revision, but as the name says an original. What would this iMac be a revision of anyway.
So in my opinion we are now at the 2nd revision and the next one is the 3rd.
The correct word for a completely new design of a given product is "generation." The correct word for gradual or incremental updates within a generation is "revision." However, the first of a generation is considered the first revision of that generation.
Just out of interest, what is all this talk of touchscreens? Who the heck wants a touchscreen? Firstly, I sit far enough away from my monitor that I can't actually touch it without sitting on the edge of my seat and leaning forward. Secondly, the last thing I want to do is to put horrid greasy (and worse) marks on the screen, and I certainly wouldn't trust family members or visitors to have as clean hands as me! And thirdly, I have a keyboard, and a mouse. Why exactly do I need to touch the screen?
When apple switched to the G5, they said it was great. when they switched the G5 to intel, they said the G5 was crap. The point is they are constantly indicating the performance is there when what they are really saying is "hey, isn't this a great design? and oh, by the way, the performance is there, trust us, here is the 'data' on that..."
Their profit margins can be larger if they are justified by an awe inspiring design. They just can't get great margins from performance alone. People go to dell for raw power, and get it cheaply.
Just to clarify, the G5 wasn't crap, it just wasn't going anywhere. Apple had to struggle to come out with a cost-effective Mac Pro that would trump the Quad G5... and in many ways, their current top-of-the-line Mac Pro still doesn't. CS3 will change that statistic, however.
-Clive
Apple does not use powerbricks on consumer products.
It may just be the fact that the computer barely hit the floor (hmm, is that like being kind of pregnant) and fell in super slow motion in a good computer bag is what to this day drives me crazy. I should mention that I was able to remold the corner back in shape with my fingers (which is scary too)..
Please, Trogdor, no.
I'm sick of the stale boring white rectangle with the stale boring aluminum stand. New ideas, please!
-Clive
The Mac Mini and Cinema Displays have external power bricks.
What, were you having a low gravity day in your area that day?![]()
yeah, i want a boring black one instead. NON glossy.