Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Question on SD slot?

I have heard things about computer companies getting rid of optical drives in the next few years, and only sticking with SD card slots. If they do this I believe it will open up a lot of room, what will they be able to add. Better graphics, better processor, more Ram...anyone know what else could be fit without the optical drive?
 
Well, consumer reports for one.....

Consumer reports suck because they test the demo model the compney sent them. The best reviews to read are that of the owners them selves. Read reviews from people who actully use the system, own it and use itn in the real world
 
I have heard things about computer companies getting rid of optical drives in the next few years, and only sticking with SD card slots. If they do this I believe it will open up a lot of room, what will they be able to add. Better graphics, better processor, more Ram...anyone know what else could be fit without the optical drive?

I think SD could substitute for some stuff, but larger SD cards are pretty cost prohibitive right now, which is what you'd need to compete with BD.
 
Consumer reports suck because they test the demo model the compney sent them. The best reviews to read are that of the owners them selves. Read reviews from people who actully use the system, own it and use itn in the real world

well, yes and no. You have to be careful with user reviews, because you can get some pretty retarded people buying equipment that they don't understand, and then giving it a bad review. Of course many of those are obvious, others are not.

And Consumer Reports doesn't test demo models a company sent them.

Consumer Reports does not print outside advertising, accept free product samples, or permit the commercial use of its reviews for selling products. Its publisher states that this policy allows the magazine to "maintain our independence and impartiality... [so that] CU has no agenda other than the interests of consumers."[3]

Consumer Reports states that all tested products are purchased at retail by its staff, that no free samples are accepted from manufacturers, and that this avoids the possibility of bias from bribery or from being given "better than average" samples.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_Reports
 
Learn how to use a right-handed mouse like all us other lefties out there. :D

Or buy another brand mouse. ;)

I'm a right hander that prefers to use the mouse left handed. Got in the habit many many years ago when was a student worker helping out other students in the labs, but also found it useful when doing spreadsheets as I could use the mouse and the keypad at the same time.

I haven't used a Apple branded mouse OR keyboard since the ADB days. Their mice and keyboards used to have such a great feel, now they feel like a limp noodle.
 
Xeon in an iMac... NEVER happen! Xeons are for the pro desktops!
If you say so.

Xeon is a slightly better binning of the same processors you get elsewhere to fit certain performance profiles. Oh and they enable ECC support. Otherwise clock per clock they're identical to their desktop mainstream counterparts.
 
Dear Apple,

Stop designing and producing symmetrical mice. The human hand is not symmetrical. Microsoft builds a really good ergonomic mouse. May I suggest following their lead.

Cinch

If your hand is that closely modeled to the mouse you are going to give yourself RSI or carpal tunnel strain or what ever the PC term is for stuffing your wrist up is these days.

now a thiner mouse would be good.
 
I bought my Mac in 2007. I had liked what I had used prior to my purchase and was all caught up in the hype of OS X. It wasn't until after the return window had closed that the problems with OS X started and the hardware started to show its limitations. I couldn't return it by the time I knew I was not satisfied with it. I've tried several times to sell it unsuccessfully. People back out because they realize they can get a better deal with a PC.



They're overpriced. $1499 for a "desktop" with a dual core processor and integrated graphics? Only a sucker is gonna fall for that.



Considering I had two units fail multiple times because of build quality, that would be true.



Go ahead and laugh at that. Let me know when OS X finally fully supports bitstream decoding of video playback, gets proper multi-display support.. better yet, let me know when OS X FINALLY gets cut and paste support in Finder.




Okay, that couldn't be further from the truth as far as PC sales are concerned. True, netbooks are selling good. But HP, Dell, etc. are still selling tens of millions more units of standard computers per year than Apple.

As Steve Jobs once put it, for Apple to double its market share it only has to go from 3% to 6%. In an industry as large as the computer industry, thats not much of an achievement.



Apple makes more money because they charge double sometimes triple what their computers are worth.

Again, a $1499 "desktop" computer with a dual core processor and integrated graphics and a 24" screen? I could build something far more powerful for $1,000 less with a similar quality screen.



Why would you pay $2999 for something that already exists in the PC market for more than $1,000 less? In fact, HP has a quad core 17.3" system for $1,349.



"Splendid customer service"? Hmm . I don't know about that. Apple only took care of me because I live in California and we have some of the strongest consumer protection laws in the world. I could have named Steve Jobs in a small claims lawsuit and had him served directly.

I also went without a Mac for nearly 3 months combined because of their "splendid" customer service returning my Mac in worse shape than I sent it out in.



I truly wish I could sell it. Every time I try the person backs out because they find a better deal on a Windows PC. It's happened 3 times now.

But its okay. For the moment my Mac is happy running Windows 7 as the primary OS and Snow Leopard just for updates.



As I've said many times before, Apple's customer service ratings are highly skewed. You have people at this forum who have had their motherboards fail half a dozen times, yet they're still "satisfied" and happy with Apple. If you have one hardware failure of that magnitude in a PC product, that customer will never buy from that company again. Apple's brand loyalty is what keeps their customer service ratings high. Though I do know of a large number of people who have had a run in with Apple support who will not be purchasing another Apple product as a result of the way Apple builds their products and treats their customers.



So you think its genius of Apple to rip people off based on their need for vanity products rather than products that would actually help them in the real world?



What innovation would that be? Glass screens? Already had been done. The two tone design? They stole it from HP. They stole the keyboard from Sony. They have no standard features like eSATA or HDMI or multi-card readers or even full size ExpressCard. The battery? My 12 cell HP battery was giving me 7 hours of battery life for almost a year before the new MacBook "Pro" was introduced.



This is the funniest thing about Apple's fanbase. Apple can do NO WRONG. It is ALWAYS the users fault.

So lets see here. It's MY fault that Apple shipped my first Mac with a bum DVD writer and a plastic case that turned yellow and cracked with heat?

It's MY fault that they screwed up the repair so many times that they had to replace the system?

It's MY fault that I only use my then new MacBook to convert the occasional video for my iPod and yet that amount of heat still caused case cracking and battery warping?

It's MY fault that even after they replaced that case, it happened again a few months later? The case and battery on that plastic Mac was about 7 months old. The battery had barely over 10 cycles on it! Yet the case still cracked from heat even though I only used it enough to keep the battery healthy and to convert the occasional video. Yet thats MY fault that it cracked? It literally NEVER left the desk and it only moved a little bit. It was never set down on the back in a manner that would affect the area that cracked.

It's MY fault that Apple's contracted technicians broke my display during the repair process and replaced it with a defective one? Uh huh.

It's my fault Apple won't build proper display support into OS X?

It's my fault that OS X completely locked up when I inserted a DVD? hah!

Instead of complaining so much, why don’t you just go buy a junky PC? Jesus Christ.
 
The battery? My 12 cell HP battery was giving me 7 hours of battery life for almost

And how far out of your computer's case does that 12 cell protrude, considering it's twice the size of a "standard" battery. And how much more did it cost? Cuz the MBPs come with a 7 hour battery that doesn't protrude.
 
Instead of complaining so much, why don’t you just go buy a junky PC? Jesus Christ.

What is this junky pc you speak of ? You sound very angry.

Does it's case crack or warp ? Does it have a nasty yellow gradient on the screen ? Fiery power power cord connectors ? Dead video cards ? Terrible wi-fi ?

I wouldn't get one of those either. :D
 
Instead of complaining so much, why don’t you just go buy a junky PC? Jesus Christ.

I don't understand why this guy is so pissed off.

It's a free country and nobody is pointing a gun to anybody's head to buy a Mac!

I'd like to see him build me a computer similar to the iMac in terms of performance and with a 24" screen for $499...
 
Why put a Xeon in an iMac. iMac's are consumer computers. Also, even with my C2D MacBook Pro I never max out two cores, so why would I really need four cores? It would be nice to have four cores for the long run - I guess but that's about all. My opinion anyway.
 
Why put a Xeon in an iMac. iMac's are consumer computers. Also, even with my C2D MacBook Pro I never max out two cores, so why would I really need four cores? It would be nice to have four cores for the long run - I guess but that's about all. My opinion anyway.

Considering that the price of quad cores overall are dropping ($97 for an AMD quad core, seen here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...08&cm_re=amd_quad_core-_-19-103-708-_-Product), I guess it's just a matter of justifying the Apple markup on hardware and getting with the times.
 
People who want more cores do more with their computer. I'm a television composer and audio engineer and use my mac for work. I'd love Apple to make anything that has more power than a laptop for less than $2500. Leaving that big gap is what leaves room for the hackintosh crowd...

I don't mind paying an Apple premium, but I don't want to pay for Xeons when i7s will do, don't want to pay for FB ram, etc. Just make a product that offers higher end power without having to jump into server class components...I know we've all been saying that for years... :-/
 
Man the trolls on this site are a annoying as windows itself... Good for you who buy a PC. Go enjoy it. Get a life.

Any iMac improvements are welcome. Of course I will want one but I won't get one.

About reselling apple products... I have sold off 4 macs now with no issues for at least 80% of thier original value.
 
Why put a Xeon in an iMac. iMac's are consumer computers. Also, even with my C2D MacBook Pro I never max out two cores, so why would I really need four cores? It would be nice to have four cores for the long run - I guess but that's about all. My opinion anyway.

exactly. if you dont use the hardware you have, you obv can skip this upgrade cycle & wait for the next one. but for people looking to buy new right now, the current line of macs is just worthless. thats probably whats getting people steamed in this thread.
 
If your hand is that closely modeled to the mouse you are going to give yourself RSI or carpal tunnel strain or what ever the PC term is for stuffing your wrist up is these days.

now a thiner mouse would be good.


I tried using Apple mouse, but I switched back to the Microsoft mouse by the second day. I don't think the palm of my hand is any closer to the mouse in either setup. I think even Dell makes a better mouse, and you know how much they spend on design:D.

Cinch
 
Jezus

Jesus some of you are sounding like really bitter old ladies, just use your computer for what you have meant too in the first place.
 
exactly. if you dont use the hardware you have, you obv can skip this upgrade cycle & wait for the next one. but for people looking to buy new right now, the current line of macs is just worthless. thats probably whats getting people steamed in this thread.

I really want an iMac. I have a MacBook Pro and it's brilliant but I want a second Mac for home use - my MacBook Pro is all about mobile computing.

Sometimes I wonder if Intel just continues to cram more cores and more features just for the sake of it. I'm perfectly happy with my C2D for everything I do. :eek:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.