Sam43054 said:Wont happen till Oct.
Im not buying it... maybe because the new iPod was supposed to be released in April? Maybe because I just want to see it sooner.
Sam43054 said:Wont happen till Oct.
Also, voice command is a silly idea. Even the best available voice command tech is not very good.hob said:maybe none-touch meant that it will NOT be touch screen... obviously the source is not a native English speaker... perhaps that's what they meant?
Also, this could be the same product as the recently rumoured NAND-based miniature mac?
JasonDawg18 said:How could it be "none-touch" - what does that mean???
interlard said:Isn't it reassuring that most companies are managed by total idiots?
nagromme said:I consider this confirmed.
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/2178811/
"None-touch," if real, probably refers to one FEATURE of the new iPod (voice control maybe), rather than something that replaces physical controls.
nagromme said:I consider this confirmed.
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/2178811/
"None-touch," if real, probably refers to one FEATURE of the new iPod (voice control maybe), rather than something that replaces physical controls.
FleurDuMal said:Eugh! I like to talk to people (and animals and plants, if I'm in the mood), not electronic gadgets!
What a waste of time 'voice command' is. I have it on my phone and NEVER use it. Ever.
nagromme said:I consider this confirmed.
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/2178811/
"None-touch," if real, probably refers to one FEATURE of the new iPod (voice control maybe), rather than something that replaces physical controls.
nagromme said:I consider this confirmed.
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/2178811/
"None-touch," if real, probably refers to one FEATURE of the new iPod (voice control maybe), rather than something that replaces physical controls.
on page 2Pragmatic67 said:"None touch" could be a bad translation? How about wireless updating between Mac/PC and iPod?? ie. non-physical contact
the future revision will only concern iPod nano, doubling storage capacityPhobophobia said:The new iPod and U2 iPod could easily coexist--especially since the U2 iPod only comes in 30 GB.
Pragmatic67 said:"None touch" could be a bad translation? How about wireless updating between Mac/PC and iPod?? ie. non-physical contact
Agreed--normally--BUT if I could Skip and Pause hands-free while the 'Pod stayed in my pocket, that would often be very nice. I wonder if any kind of useful mic could be incorporated into an earbud without needing to be bulky.celebrian23 said:I hate voice commands. You cann't speak normal- you have to articulate your words more than normal and if you talk fast like I do, you have to slow it down. No thanks I say.
You must have read it the way I did, with the hyphen in the wrong placejaxstate said:"Apple files patent for a reliable real-time transport protocol"
makes u go umm..
Phobophobia said:The new iPod and U2 iPod could easily coexist--especially since the U2 iPod only comes in 30 GB.
aricher said:hmmmm - touch screen interface with optional voice controls?
nagromme said:agreed--normally--BUT if I could Skip and Pause hands-free while the 'Pod stayed in my pocket, that would often be very nice. I wonder if any kind of useful mic could be incorporated into an earbud without needing to be bulky.
I'm skeptical, but that's the one use I can see.
thejadedmonkey said:I can't wait for a new one...it's about time, the 5th gen really didn't impress me as being anything more than evolutional. Here's to hoping this one's revolutional in it's design, much like the 1st, 3rd, and mini were.
RodThePlod said:Exactly!
I'd guess that any new iPod coming now would be the top end model with wireless and enhanced PDA functionality - leaving the lower models intact.