macgeek2005 said:Could it come out next tuesday?
Chundles said:It will come out next Tuesday, I have it on good authority. Trust me, I'm Australian...
Macnoviz said:Well, in fact I think they would benefit when they release a new iPod around this time:
1. There isn't a lot of news this time of the year, so a new iPod, especially one with a radically new interface, would certainly be covered well in the media
2. Holiday is coming, and a lot of people want to take their music with them outside, and a new cool iPod would be a goo way to do this
3. Exams will be (almost) done, and students will start coming out again, and younger kids may get something for their good grades, and such
and last but not least: October is just SO far away to wait
Macnoviz said:All the clues are there, there's no more doubt about it:
New Powerbooks on Thuesday !!
dausone said:Im not buying it... maybe because the new iPod was supposed to be released in April? Maybe because I just want to see it sooner.
jTreu said:finally, ive been waiting forever for the G5 Powerbooks
celebrian23 said:Lest you forget one thing: holiday season. And by holiday I mean christmas. October is perfect christhas shopping season time. Summer is not.
Chundles said:But what if Christmas IS summer???
Sam43054 said:First iPod was in Oct of 2001, Oct 2001 to Oct 2006 is 5 years... They will make a big deal out of it being 5 years!!!!![]()
eppel said:I know for sure what "non touch" implies.
It's a touch screen interface with sensors which only require you to float maybe a few millimeteres above the screen to be activated. That way your screen won't become messy with fingerprints because you don't actually have to touch it. makes much more sense then voice control. Ar ridiculous idea. I bet my bankacount I'm right.
Play Ultimate said:Like they did for Apple's 30th birthday.![]()
eppel said:I know for sure what "non touch" implies.
It's a touch screen interface with sensors which only require you to float maybe a few millimeteres above the screen to be activated. That way your screen won't become messy with fingerprints because you don't actually have to touch it. makes much more sense then voice control. Ar ridiculous idea. I bet my bankacount I'm right.
eppel said:I know for sure what "non touch" implies.
It's a touch screen interface with sensors which only require you to float maybe a few millimeteres above the screen to be activated. That way your screen won't become messy with fingerprints because you don't actually have to touch it. makes much more sense then voice control. Ar ridiculous idea. I bet my bankacount I'm right.[/QUOTE
I don't really think that that is a good solution, because it will be hard to do, and require visual contact with your iPod
Anywho, I don't think should speculate on "non-touch", I would really like to know how he said it exactly.
celebrian23 said:If that's true, then it's too late to shop for something that's already in progress, so they might as well wait until summer is over to introduce something fresh![]()
Balli said:Maybe the whole "no touch" concept is simpler than people think...
Imagine the front of the new iPods being a screen, and most (if not all) the controls being on the headphones instead instead of the iPod itself.
boncellis said:Another possibility--or on the remote that headphones plug into. Sony had this kind of thing going for a while with their Walkman/Discman line, even an RF wireless remote on a few selected products.
Could you plug headphones into an RF remote? That is, transmit the music over RF or would it have to be Bluetooth? Maybe the bt rumors have something to do with this.