I don't need you to tell me what forum is right for me. You probably would not like it either, if I tell you what forum you should go to, or where should you go at all? I've owned dozens of Apple products and still do and I own AAPL stock for now: that is why I am here. But, unlike to others, Apple is not a religion to me: the iPhone does not work for me anymore and I am not happy with the direction Apple is taking. Apple achieves high sales/margins using marketing hype, sweatshop labor and litigation rather than focus on delivering best products. Apple is fat, lazy and stagnant.
Again, it is your ridiculous excuse, that Apple could not deliver the LTE iphone because others could not achieve great battery life. I thought the iPhone suppose to be premium and innovative device, unlike others? Why would you set the "horrible android battery life" as a standard for the premium and "innovative" iphone? The answer is simple: because the iphone is no longer premium and innovative, but quite opposite. And the 4" iphone 5 is already obsolete on arrival.
Oh God you're Kanye West!Lol seems like Apple is a religion to you not me!!
You've owned dozens of apple products, you seem passionate on why you dislike apple and where it's going....and here I am just ****in around pushing your buttons to piss you offlol
Lol seems like Apple is a religion to you not me!!
You've owned dozens of apple products, you seem passionate on why you dislike apple and where it's going....and here I am just ****in around pushing your buttons to piss you offlol
You gave yourself too much credit. You are trying to please yourself: there is a word for that Image
This. Created an account with macrumors just so I could give kudos to this guy.
sigh... not w/ the same power consumption. I like LTE, just don't love how much battery it sucks out of the current devices. Android LTE phones are like buying a car that can run really fast, but you have to stop every 1/4 mile to fill it up w/ gas.
Right![]()
Sht Apple Fanatics Say, Parts 1 and 2:
[url=http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/FFhjDX-DUew/default.jpg]Image[/URL]
[url=http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/kTTSsB92L_s/default.jpg]Image[/URL]
Welcome to the future, iSheep!
The Samsung Galaxy Note LTE (which I also mentioned in my previous post) was released last year, not this year.
Your excuse for iPhone not having LTE cause android LTE phones have "horrible battery life", which is a ridiculous excuse. Why did not Apple release LTE iphone last year with good battery life? Why Samsung could deliver?
I see painfully arrogant sheep still think their ****** doesn't stink because they use Apple products.
You must rarely use the internet then, here is graph for you:I had no problems with LTE so far on my Galaxy Nexus, it has similar battery life to my iPhone 4S.
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&site=&...gc.r_pw.&fp=6b84d0fa3aa1a1b6&biw=1231&bih=886This. Created an account with macrumors just so I could give kudos to this guy.
Its funny how LTE matters now, despite Android having it for a year and a half.
What are the odds that the iPhone 5 will be compatible with China Mobile's proprietary TD-SCDMA 3G network?
Second - the ICE example. Who gives a flying **** about this stupid example. Why should I cut into my personal data amount, when there is a free WLAN Hotspot in that train?
I definitely get more than 3 hours of browsing, maybe I have a newer revision of the phone?You must rarely use the internet then, here is graph for you:
Image
I don't need you to tell me what forum is right for me. You probably would not like it either, if I tell you what forum you should go to, or where should you go at all? I've owned dozens of Apple products and still do and I own AAPL stock for now: that is why I am here. But, unlike to others, Apple is not a religion to me: the iPhone does not work for me anymore and I am not happy with the direction Apple is taking. Apple achieves high sales/margins using marketing hype, sweatshop labor and litigation rather than focus on delivering best products. Apple is fat, lazy and stagnant.
Again, it is your ridiculous excuse, that Apple could not deliver the LTE iphone because others could not achieve great battery life. I thought the iPhone suppose to be premium and innovative device, unlike others? Why would you set the "horrible android battery life" as a standard for the premium and "innovative" iphone? The answer is simple: because the iphone is no longer premium and innovative, but quite opposite. And the 4" iphone 5 is already obsolete on arrival.
oh, great. congratulation. other companies already started with it last year. it's too late, dumb ****. Samsung & HTC will sue it. bye, rotten apple.
No you don't, it's your imagination or your light web browsing use makes you think otherwise. 3hrs is what you get for web browsing, check all reviews they all say the same thing. Blame the white webpages that are the ones really taxing on AMOLEDs.I definitely get more than 3 hours of browsing, maybe I have a newer revision of the phone?