I never thought they could make smoking look more stupid. Then vaping came....
Smoking regularly is stupid, but I wouldn't say it looks stupid. Unfortunately, it looks pretty cool if it's a cigar(ette) and not a vape thing. Though some crowds think vaping looks cool too.I never thought they could make smoking look more stupid. Then vaping came....
Or just neither smoke nor vape except on rare occasions, and don't get addicted to it. Problem solved. Also, where is vape ever limited more than tobacco? There are no anti-vaping laws I've heard that neither apply to tobacco as well nor have a tobacco counterpart.It's amazing that the general consensus seems to be that smoking is stupid because it kills you, but vaping looks stupid and that's even worse. This matter-of-fact attitude about vaping does nothing but aide the anti-vaping legislation being pushed throughout the world. Perhaps if it were more commonly seen as the highly effective and comparatively safe means of quitting tobacco that it is, fewer people might die of the number 1 cause of preventable diseases each year.
But yeah, that's not to say this would be the right product category for Apple to enter.
Would've been wrong target audience. I think people who vape use Windows Vista and a Blackberry or Windows phone.
The point is, it's nowhere near as harmful as tobacco according to current research, and therefore shouldn't be subject to the same or comparable laws. That it is seen as such, is harmful both to consumers looking for an effective means of quitting smoking, and to the cottage industry of vaping products that stands no chance of competing with big tobacco companies under restrictive legislation. And your solution to simply not smoke or vape often enough to get addicted is not only asinine, but dismissive of the billions of people around the world who are already addicted.Smoking regularly is stupid, but I wouldn't say it looks stupid. Unfortunately, it looks pretty cool if it's a cigar(ette) and not a vape thing. Though some crowds think vaping looks cool too.
[doublepost=1485594370][/doublepost]
Or just neither smoke nor vape except on rare occasions, and don't get addicted to it. Problem solved. Also, where is vape ever limited more than tobacco? There are no anti-vaping laws I've heard that neither apply to tobacco as well nor have a tobacco counterpart.
I'd buy that.
The point of the laws are:The point is, it's nowhere near as harmful as tobacco according to current research, and therefore shouldn't be subject to the same or comparable laws. That it is seen as such, is harmful both to consumers looking for an effective means of quitting smoking, and to the cottage industry of vaping products that stands no chance of competing with big tobacco companies under restrictive legislation. And your solution to simply not smoke or vape often enough to get addicted is not only asinine, but dismissive of the billions of people around the world who are already addicted.
Same as all the Americans who drink soda as a replacement for water. To be fair, in most cases, it merely shortens your lifespan