Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm waiting for the Apple fan boi justifying Apple charging to put ringtones that the customer may have already paid for, spending more money for the opportunity to put on their iPhone.

It should be a fun time...
 
Does it bother anyone else that this iPhone (as great as it is), is so freaking buggy, yet Apple is wasting their effort looking for new sources of cash flow?

*chortle* You mean they're doing what every other successful business does? Wow.

And BTW, iPhone is up to 1.0.2 in case you hadn't noticed. Looks like they're addressing bugs just fine.
 
I don't really care about whether or not the Beatles are released on iTunes but ringtones without hacking would be awesome. I hope they are right about this. My one concern is that you won't be able to make tones from songs you got off cd's.
 
Nobody reads if you say say "RIGHT. WE AGREE THE RUMOR." You have to say something contrary and then have more information. Alley Insider is just trying to draw in traffic. THAT'S IT.

"The Beat Goes On" couldn't be more specific to The Beatles coming to iTunes than ANYTHING EVER, unless the line was "The BEATLES GO ON iTUNES".

We've got all the boys and their solo stuff up now (I think George's label said "Sod off") and now the Finale, with the Group's efforts going on next. EMI & Apple love each other. Apple Inc. & Apple Corps kissed and made up. It's the freakin' Summer-O-Love. ;)
 
No Beatles til 08 early maybe Macworld. A new Ringo Hits came out yesterday and McCartney has a three disd career spanning DVD of his solo video work coming in November.

They will NOT compete with themselves.

That's like saying Apple is going to stop selling iPods at Best Buy because they don't want to compete with themselves. Nonsense.

How is being on iTunes competing with yourself?
 
Keep your fingers crossed: WHITE iPODS

iPhone Gadget OS X Rumors Weekly claims a reliable source has information regarding next Wednesday's Apple Media Event.

Announcement 1: Release of the entire Sonny and Cher Library - completely DRM free.

Announcement 2: Red iPOD Shuffles - 10 cents of every Red iPOD sold will go towards feeding the children of Africa (this up 5 cents from last year).

Announcement 3: Hi-Fi II - Should be exactly the same shape and size as the original Hi-FI, but will have 3 additional feet of power cord and a glossy finish to the front grill (no option for matte finish).

ONE MORE THING: Everybody wants The BEATLES catalog and a Beatles flavored iPOD. Can you say "WHITE ALBUM"? That's right... you too can own the Beatles White Album on your special "WHITE ALBUM" 7th Generation iPOD. The entire album on one beautiful white iPOD.

I hope these rumors are true. I can hardly imagine a white iPOD. :D
 
I'm waiting for the Apple fan boi justifying Apple charging to put ringtones that the customer may have already paid for, spending more money for the opportunity to put on their iPhone.

It should be a fun time...

Just about every post you make seems to be you complaining about Apple Fan boi's... why the hell do you come to this forum then? Why don't you just chill out with the negativity (jealousy?) and move on...
 
They're not going to intro the Beatles, yet they're using the Beatles albums on their media PR. Yea, they wont introduce the Beatles albums.
 
"The Beat Goes On" couldn't be more specific to The Beatles coming to iTunes than ANYTHING EVER, unless the line was "The BEATLES GO ON iTUNES".

See, I agree with you. Wasn't it at the "D" conference that Jobs said he wants to know too when it would happen? The clue was "soon..."

Well, now would be perfect timing wouldn't you say?

-=|Mgkwho
 
It's not necessarily the Beatles, but what they represent. They're the most popular band ever, so when they choose to stay away from digital music stores, it makes bands like Led Zeppelin and AC/DC think that it's the best way to go about things. Getting the Beatles in the digital music stores would break down a barrier and I think would eventually lead to ALL major artists being in digital stores, including newer acts like Radiohead.
 
Who cares about the Beatles?

Agreed.

However, to answer your question directly, people who were alive in the 1960's care about them, because it reminds them of those times and brings back memories of what they used to listen to back then.

But people like me (and probably you), born in later generations, couldn't care two cents about the Beatles.
 
Boo. Frickin. Hoo. Are you serious?
Let's see, this year we've had:

* iPhone launch
* New iMac
* Mac Mini NOT put to sleep, quite the opposite (CPU upgrade, HD upgrade)
* iLife '08 (the best part being the major updates to iPhoto)
* iWork '08 (new app, Numbers; and nice updates to Pages and Keynote)
* iPhoto/.Mac/iPhone get very awesome "Web Gallery" feature
* .Mac users get much-needed major storage boost from 1GB to 10GB for FREE

What a horrible year so far. Appalling.

- Not interested in a $600 phone or AT&T or many of the shortcomings for that price.
- I like the new iMac. Only had to wait a year for the update.
- Mac-mini finally got updated after a year as well. Too long between revs.
- iLife is late. They can call it '08 and make it seem early all they want.
- Numbers seems interesting. Again, iWork '08 is a late '07.
- Not impressed with iPhoto/.Mac/iPhone. Big deal.
- .Mac gets 10GB. It's $99, NOT free. Big deal. I've had 1TB for almost a year now. It was only $54 and I have my own domain with unlimited email accounts. Dot Mac still very weak. Try globat.com

Apple hasn't bumped DVD drive speeds in a couple of years. They haven't added eSata to their machines yet. They pushed Leopard back because of the iPhone. AppleTV has no HD content from iTunes.

Much of 2007 seems to be setting up for 2008. I think 2008 will be a much better year. All these things should mature. I'd like to see them push more on the computer side next year. Leopard will be out. Hopefully the can concentrate on it's capabilities. :)
 
beatles?

Can anyone actually confirm that the final Beatles press release had "the beat goes on" at the end? Are we all just trusting Appleinsider on this?

if you look at the album covers on their advertisement. the one slightly left is a beastie boys cover. hence the beat goes on
 
im calling bullsh*t, this sounds like informed speculation, anybody could make the same assumptions by reading this site alone.
 
Agreed.

However, to answer your question directly, people who were alive in the 1960's care about them, because it reminds them of those times and brings back memories of what they used to listen to back then.

But people like me (and probably you), born in later generations, couldn't care two cents about the Beatles.

Exactly. I don't care about any band that made music before 1982 and I also disregard any influence they had on the music industry and music as a whole before I was born.

Basically music before 1982 does not exist in my mind.
 
Agreed.

However, to answer your question directly, people who were alive in the 1960's care about them, because it reminds them of those times and brings back memories of what they used to listen to back then.

But people like me (and probably you), born in later generations, couldn't care two cents about the Beatles.

Speak for yourself! If you know anything about music you wouldn't make such a stupid and blanket statement, but that's YOUR choice, not everyone in your age group. Yeah, I didn't grow up at the time of Matisse, Monet, or Mozart, yet that doesn't make me appreciate them any less. Just because YOU don't like or care for the Beatles, doesn't make ALL people of your generation think like you. People from all age groups, races and backgrounds appreciate them for their talent.

"because it reminds them of those times and brings back memories of what they used to listen to back then."

You really think that's the only reason why people like the Beatles? Really? I can like the Beatles, Rimsky-Korsakov, Mozart, White Stripes and the Velvet Underground, but not because of "memories" but because umm . . . I don't know . . how about because it's incredible music! I suggest you go to the library or a record store and just listen to music, ALL kinds of music. There's more to music than just what's out there now.

People appreciate the Beatles because they appreciate music. I know it's a hard concept, but you might be surprised that's it true.
 
I've been wondering this about ringtones (and correct me anywhere I'm wrong):

I've heard that under 30 seconds can be used under Fair Use (like Amazon and iTunes track preview) and as far as I know, phones will usually ring for 30 seconds before going to voicemail. If both are true, then Apple could technically let us rip 30 song clips and use them as ringtones without it being a copyright violation or anything.

And I understand that they could sell us ringtones but really, Apple doesn't want pocket change from ringtones, they want the gold from iPhone sales.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.