no Ethernet in 2012 MBP? bad move

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by PracticalMac, Jun 11, 2012.

  1. PracticalMac, Jun 11, 2012
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2012

    PracticalMac macrumors 68030

    PracticalMac

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #1
    Too many businesses insist on Ethernet for security reasons.
    WiFi still far slower then Gigabit Ethernet.

    MBA is fine because it is designed for size (not meant for significant projects), but on a Pro machine?

    EDIT:
    Forcing one to get (buy) a dongle to use a industry wide standard and expected connection on a business/pro level machine is bad practice.
    This is not about pushing advanced technology, its about supporting technology that is still top of line and ubiquitous.

    Dongles are also bad practice in industry, used only for very specific, limited reasons. They can get damaged, lost, stolen. Worse is damage to the Thunderbolt port itself. Remember why Apple went with MagSafe power connection?
     
  2. dukebound85 macrumors P6

    dukebound85

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Location:
    5045 feet above sea level
    #2
    then get the updated pro:rolleyes:

    the only one with no ethernet is the retina model and that has dongles for ethernet
     
  3. mac jones macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    #3
    It's not really a pro but a hybrid Air/Pro apparently.
     
  4. KylePowers macrumors 68000

    KylePowers

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    #4
    Honest question - What businesses/companies do people work for that they'd notice the difference in speed between WiFi and ethernet? What would you actually be doing that would make the difference apparent?
     
  5. Havok83 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 12, 2012
    #5
    You do realize that ethernet is still an option for ALL MBPs? Thats what an adapter is for....
     
  6. beamer8912 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    #6
    Use the adapter
     
  7. PracticalMac thread starter macrumors 68030

    PracticalMac

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #7
    AKA MacBook. ;)

    Video editors?
    3D models?
     
  8. m85476585 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    #8
    I wonder if the HDMI port supports ethernet. That would be nice because it would mean cheap adapters are possible. Otherwise I need to get a Thunderbolt ethernet adapter that costs who knows how much, and I need to keep track of it just for those rare inopportune times when there's no wifi.
     
  9. KylePowers macrumors 68000

    KylePowers

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    #9
    I'm not too familiar with what they do (aside from the obvious implication of their titles). So you're saying their files are all stored remotely or something? I was under the impression it was all done on a computer, no internet connection really required?
     
  10. fisherking macrumors 603

    fisherking

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Location:
    ny somewhere
    #10
    thunderbolt port and an adapter cable for either firewire 800, or gigabyte ethernet.

    so all is well....(or well enough) :D
     
  11. guzhogi macrumors 68030

    guzhogi

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Location:
    Wherever my feet take me…
    #11
    The only time I really need to use ethernet is for work (I'm an IT guy for a school. When we get new computers or a computer crashed & I need to wipe the hard drive, I just boot off a Netboot server and put y school's appropriate software on. Unfortunately, or Netboot system doesn't support Wi-fi. Fortunately, there's going to be adaptors. Probably $69 adaptors or something, but adaptors nonetheless.

    ----------

    May have a NAS on the local network, not necessarily on the internet.
     
  12. KylePowers macrumors 68000

    KylePowers

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    #12
    Sorry, that's what I meant... some type of network connection. Hmm, well interesting. Looks like people will have to go with the regular MBPs or get a Thunderbolt or USB 3.0 ethernet adapter.

    It's a good thing though. Once more companies nix ethernet, it'll force networking companies to pump out faster wireless and more secure routers. They'll stay relatively stagnant if no one pushes them, because there's really no profitable reason to push the boundaries.
     
  13. salmoally macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    #13
    Buy the normal MBP, ill be enjoying my thin retina MBP and use a dongle if (read never) required.
     
  14. TechieGeek macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    #14
    I bet you could get one for under $10 on eBay...

    It's just wire. You don't need to get the Apple branded one that costs 5x more than it costs to build.
     
  15. Adamantoise macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    #15
    Honestly they really should have just included it. It costs next to nothing, but I guess they wanted it as thin as possible.

    I wonder how much that accessory will cost, probably $30 to $50 ... Lol. Apple gonna Apple.

    ----------

    Lord have mercy.

    HDMI support Ethernet? Lol, just ... Lol. You guys are killing me here.
     
  16. jamesryanbell macrumors 68020

    jamesryanbell

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    #16
    It SEEEMS old to have an ethernet port. Everything else is immediately second rate. Use wifi, make it secure.
     
  17. apolloa macrumors G3

    apolloa

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Location:
    Time, because it rules EVERYTHING!
    #17
    I'll tell you something that is bad, they appear to have not updated the Mac pro in anyway at all:

    http://www.apple.com/macpro/

    !!! oh dear.... I can hear the Pro's running to Windows....

    As for ethernet, yeah it is VERY poor that they dropped it from a machine costing so much and then failed to include 802.11 AC wireless! That is what they should have done. But we will need to see how much the adapters are I guess.
     
  18. miles01110 macrumors Core

    miles01110

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Location:
    The Ivory Tower (I'm not coming down)
    #18
    This is the direction that Apple is moving in anyways. It's more of an admission of failure to make inroads into the enterprise than anything else. Consumers usually just don't need an ethernet port.
     
  19. Martialis macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    #19
    Seriously? Anything involving collaborating on very large files. :rolleyes:
     
  20. Ap0ks macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    #20
    Go check the 1.4 spec before you laugh too hard (it has a 100Mb ethernet channel) ;)
     
  21. rdrr macrumors 6502a

    rdrr

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2003
    Location:
    NH
    #21
    Large file transfers to a server. Basic sysadmin work.

    Setting up Lights Out Server controls with a cat 5 cable. No servers I know of have wireless in the datacenter.
     
  22. Adamantoise macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    #22
    Whoa, I didn't know that!

    Still, 100Mb is pathetic in today's data heavy world ... It's a shame they didn't have the foresight to put in gigabit.
     
  23. wesk702 macrumors 68000

    wesk702

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2007
    Location:
    The hood
    #23
    Good point. Unless you work for rapidshare I don't really see the point.
     
  24. pragmatous macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    #24
    The dongle will be faster than an actual port because it's going thru a 10gb bus.

     
  25. theluggage, Jun 11, 2012
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2012

    theluggage macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    #25
    If you're only using WiFi to hook up to the Internet then its probably faster than your broadband connection, so that's fine. If you actually start file-sharing between machines, then its really not that fast at all, unless you've got a cutting-edge WiFi router and no interference. Neither 300Mbps WiFi or 1Gbps Ethernet actually gives you anything like that speed in practice, but I'd rather have half of 1000 than half of 300 thank you.

    Easy: Working with files over a network for sharing or backup. At home I have 2 or 3 systems hooked up with Gigabit, used for Time Machine backups (faster is better) or, when I bring my work machine home, I just plug it in and mount it over the network from my home machine and work on the files, rather than juggle displays and keyboards.

    At work, they only have 100Mbps Ethernet, but even that's faster than the WiFi there.

    As for the new MacBook Pro - if the Thunderbolt-to-Ethernet dongle isn't too overpriced (Edit: $30), its a solution, esp. considering that there are now 2 Thunderbolt ports and HDMI and 3 USB3 ports. On an old MBP with 2xUSB2 (not fast enough for 1Gbps and hard on the CPU) and only 1 Thunderbolt (which doubles as the only display output) it would have been a deal breaker.
     

Share This Page