iPod touch No iOS 7 for iPod touch 4g?

[Wolfpup]

"no longer safe"
...
...
...
Because you didn't get shiny new icons? What???

There are 0 unpatched userland-exclusive (you can run them in your web browser, without plugging the device in and running specific jailbreak programs) vulnerabilities for iOSes dating as far back as 4.2.1 --- and it's pretty safe to say that if one ever came out again, an update would patch it, even if a newer iOS came out. (see iOS 4.2 on iPhone 3G)

This has nothing to do with jailbreaking. Just as one example, iOS 6 and earlier and OS X earlier than 10.9 have font rendering vulnerabilities.

 

[53kyle]

This has nothing to do with jailbreaking. Just as one example, iOS 6 and earlier and OS X earlier than 10.9 have font rendering vulnerabilities.

OS X 10.8.5 doesn't have font rendering problems. Either way, most people wont run into the glitch in normal web browsing.

 

[spyguy10709]

This has nothing to do with jailbreaking. Just as one example, iOS 6 and earlier and OS X earlier than 10.9 have font rendering vulnerabilities.

Jailbreaking - getting root access.

Jailbreaking is getting "root" access on a device - "breaking" the "sandbox" that apps have to run in to protect the user. A malicious exploit is exactly the same as a Jailbreak. One and the same. So excuse me if I'm using "nice" language. Let me rephrase.

You honestly have nothing to worry about. What were you expecting when you bought underpowered hardware 3 years after its release? That "font rendering" vulnerability caused a "buffer overrun" -- or crash. The application just quit. Not an exploit, not at all.

 

[Wolfpup]

OS X 10.8.5 doesn't have font rendering problems. Either way, most people wont run into the glitch in normal web browsing.

Yes it does. It's a flaw IN the font rendering system, and the point is bad guys can use it. That's just one example.

Anyway the point is it's never safe to use OSes that are no longer getting security updates if you're connecting them to the internet, particularly for web browsing and email.

----------

Jailbreaking is getting "root" access on a device - "breaking" the "sandbox" that apps have to run in to protect the user. A malicious exploit is exactly the same as a Jailbreak. One and the same.

They're not one and the same, even if they're potentially related. "Jailbreaking" may rely on exploits, and has a recent, particular, normally non-malicious meaning regarding consumer electronics.

Regardless, it is not safe or sensible to use an OS on the Internet that's no longer receiving security updates. At that point you're relying on security through obscurity for protection.

 

[hintzsche]

why not support a device 2 years after the selling was stopped. even microsoft supports an os after it was not selled anymore. cause its sad that you buy an ipod now and tomorrow you don't get the new update.

 

[Wolfpup]

why not support a device 2 years after the selling was stopped. even microsoft supports an os after it was not selled anymore. cause its sad that you buy an ipod now and tomorrow you don't get the new update.

Yeah, I think all these devices need to have OS updates, at least for security, for years after they're last sold. The worst offender is Android, where you can easily buy an Android device running an OS that hasn't been safe or up to date for YEAAAARS, and even on new supposedly high end devices you're lucky if you get one or two updates 6 months late if ever.

Ditching a device in the same year you quit selling it is Apple's record though. They should have quit selling that thing at least last year.