Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I agree with Gorilla Power. I wanted IPS too, but at the end of the day it isn't a big deal. If you want IPS get an iMac, it's more powerful and bigger as well.

Some people need notebooks for a reason; and not just because they want to spend more money for a less powerful machine…:rolleyes:
 
Not only wide angle viewing. Excellent color consistency and reproduction too.
IPS is really preferable for photographers and designers.

This.

I didn't really expect IPS, but it woulda been nice. And with the bump in the supposed battery life to 8-9 hrs from 7, they could presumably have put it in without killing battery life.
 
The hell it isn't. Desktop computer parts are much cheaper than mobile counterparts. I admit it would have been nice if Apple provided an option in their BTO but I'm not going to miss it in any way.

If Apple can put a 21 incher in a $1200 machine, they can put a 15 incher in a $2500 machine. If apple can put a 10 incher in a $500 machine, they can put a 13 incher in a $1200 machine. Cost really isn't that extreme for these panels; they've been around, it's not like they are OLED.

And all that aside, god forbid they offer it as a BTO and let the consumer take it up the rear since we all know Apple isn't happy with less than like 2000% profit margin.

I'm sure cost is also the reason there is no 640 GB HDD. That extra $10 for Apple, ouch.:rolleyes:
 
I agree with Gorilla Power. I wanted IPS too, but at the end of the day it isn't a big deal. If you want IPS get an iMac, it's more powerful and bigger as well.

The only problem with these suggestions is that the MBP is PORTABLE and the iMac ISN'T. Just a small oversight though. :p
 
Apple has been promoting the Macbook Pro as a Professional laptop, hence the nomenclature.

Oh yea ? Where's my air in MacBook Air ?


IPS is a standard in the industry. NO photographer/designer worth his salt uses anything other than IPS. It's a fact. Which is why we assume the "Pro" laptops we are using should have it. I mean, even e-IPS is better than nothing...

This is a kick in the nuts to all working photographers, graphic designers and to a certain extent, filmmakers...

Filmmakers don't use a notebook to produce movies. Pro photographers never develop their photographs on a notebook for final publishing. Serious professionals have external displays. Either you've never come anywhere near a professional photographer ever in your life or you're a blatantly lying hypocrite. I've been working for one of the biggest magazines in the world for the past 2 years. I roam around in the best of best photojournalism studios around the world. I've never come across a single professional who ever whined to me about not having an IPS display hindering their work. You are living in your own dream world.
 
I'm pretty disappointed with Apple notebook displays. Fortunately, I don't use my 13" Aluminum Macbook (not pro) with the internal screen much - I use it for iPhone development and have it attached to an old Samsung SyncMaster with is a 1600x1200 IPS display.

My circa-2000 IBM Thinkpad has a 15" 1600x1200 IPS display which is (sorry, Steve) gorgeous. It's a higher pixel density than the new "high resolution" Macbook Pro model. (Being this old, it's a 4:3 aspect ratio.) The stingy vertical resolution on wide Macbook displays has always bothered me.
 
Absolutely blows my mind how people can advocate keeping crappy technology when there is clearly superior technologies available.
 
Don't mean to start arguing with you. Congrats on your success in life and the industry. I don't mean to demean you or say you are wrong, but this is technology. We should expect it move forward.

I am a freelance photog located in Montreal. I DO work in the industry. I HAVE worked with a lot of other professional photographs and designers. I DO edit and do colour critical work for print. Please do not call me a hypocrite after reading a single post of mine.

I know what you mean by saying this is a LAPTOP. I use a MBP as can be seen in my sig. I use it for my work in the field and when on the move. I am not whining about the lack of IPS. I am just stating that with the advancement of technology, it's to be expected.

For all colour critical work, I use an external IPS monitor. However, there are certainly times when I wish I had it on my MBP. Wouldn't you appreciate the ability to do all your work (pre to post) on a single device while on the road?

Again, I don't want to start a war with you. I don't doubt your knowledge, but IPS has it's uses and would certainly be appreciated in the Macbook Pros. Even if it's only BTO.

Regards,
Sim

EDIT: Oh and a lot of filmmakers/videographers use notebooks. A lot of reporters work on the road almost 100% of the time. I guess you are right that they don't rely on notebooks for post, but still, it would be appreciated.
Oh yea ? Where's my air in MacBook Air ?






Filmmakers don't use a notebook to produce movies. Pro photographers never develop their photographs on a notebook for final publishing. Serious professionals have external displays. Either you've never come anywhere near a professional photographer ever in your life or you're a blatantly lying hypocrite. I've been working for one of the biggest magazines in the world for the past 2 years. I roam around in the best of best photojournalism studios around the world. I've never come across a single professional who ever whined to me about not having an IPS display hindering their work. You are living in your own dream world.
 
How can you be so sure the panels aren't IPS when nobody has one of these new machines yet? As far as I know the 24" LED cinema display is an IPS panel but they don't mention it at all... So just coz they don't say explicitly "these new machines have IPS panels" doesn't mean they don't (or that they do)... Nobody will know till they ship
 
Don't mean to start arguing with you. Congrats on your success in life and the industry. I don't mean to demean you or say you are wrong, but this is technology. We should expect it move forward.

I am a freelance photog located in Montreal. I DO work in the industry. I HAVE worked with a lot of other professional photographs and designers. I DO edit and do colour critical work for print. Please do not call me a hypocrite after reading a single post of mine.

I know what you mean by saying this is a LAPTOP. I use a MBP as can be seen in my sig. I use it for my work in the field and when on the move. I am not whining about the lack of IPS. I am just stating that with the advancement of technology, it's to be expected.

For all colour critical work, I use an external IPS monitor. However, there are certainly times when I wish I had it on my MBP. Wouldn't you appreciate the ability to do all your work (pre to post) on a single device while on the road?

Again, I don't want to start a war with you. I don't doubt your knowledge, but IPS has it's uses and would certainly be appreciated in the Macbook Pros. Even if it's only BTO.

Regards,
Sim

EDIT: Oh and I know that filmmakers don't use computer monitors to edit, which is why I wrote "to a certain extent". However with the shift in distribution mediums, and with the way the Web is becoming a dominant medium for video, a high quality panel would certainly help for colour critical work.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I'm happy Apple didn't put an IPS in. All I'm saying is its not a have - or - die feature for professionals like you said in your previous post.

I too mentioned a few posts back that it would have been good to have it as a BTO. Afterall, who doesn't like nice things ?
 
How can you be so sure the panels aren't IPS when nobody has one of these new machines yet? As far as I know the 24" LED cinema display is an IPS panel but they don't mention it at all... So just coz they don't say explicitly "these new machines have IPS panels" doesn't mean they don't (or that they do)... Nobody will know till they ship

Because Apple marketing would JUMP on it if they were. It would be a big selling point for them.
 
I'm not sure where you are getting your information from. How do you know these aren't 8-bit?

The macbook pros do not have a 8 bit panel. Read professional review where they test the color accuracy of the display or look up the panel model. They are all TN (6 bit) panels.
 
But would they? If they don't jump on it for the LED cinema display, why would they jump on it for the MBPs?
 
How can you be so sure the panels aren't IPS when nobody has one of these new machines yet? As far as I know the 24" LED cinema display is an IPS panel but they don't mention it at all... So just coz they don't say explicitly "these new machines have IPS panels" doesn't mean they don't (or that they do)... Nobody will know till they ship

Because it's a huge marketing point for the iPad, they would certainly highlight it on the MBP.
 
The macbook pros do not have a 8 bit panel. Read professional review where they test the color accuracy of the display or look up the panel model. They are all TN (6 bit) panels.

My point is, nobody whatsoever has reviewed these models yet - a 1680x1050 panel has never been offered in a MBP before, so whatever anyone knew about older models is totally irrelevant... how can you say with such certainty that it isn't IPS?
 
My point is, nobody whatsoever has reviewed these models yet - a 1680x1050 panel has never been offered in a MBP before, so whatever anyone knew about older models is totally irrelevant... how can you say with such certainty that it isn't IPS?


well, your point is irrelevant, cause it is not reality.
 
Absolutely blows my mind how people can advocate keeping crappy technology when there is clearly superior technologies available.

Agree, it's really weird...
I guess Steve has created a successful cult - a bunch of blind people
following and giving him money....
 
*drools hopelessly*

Why is Apple incapable of offering that sort of hardware, even at an obscene price?

Exactly, i mean that's what Apple used to be about. Having the best gear for an outrageous price. I don't like paying the Apple tax and having a computer that's just barely on par with windows PCs… (and yes, i will still buy a Mac…sigh…)
 
well, your point is irrelevant, cause it is not reality.


What is reality? How do you know reality? The reality is Aristotle that you don't have one of these machines yet and no one does yet so who knows. So don't try to distinguish reality from fiction when no one has the knowledge yet. He is just presenting an idea, obviously your ignorance is to strong to see this.

Do photographers/designers/filmmakers want IPS? YES

Should MacBook PRO's have an IPS screen at this price point? YES

Should Macbook PRO's have much OTHER stuff at this price point? YES

Everyone and there mother can tell you that the MBP's should have i22's with OLED techonology with 5tb SSDs 64 gigs or ram but they don't. So for now we are stuck with TN sadly......
 
Has anyone even seen the displays? Is there a possibility that they are using higher quality TN panels? Not IPS to be sure, but perhaps there was a panel switch we havn't seen yet.
 
What is reality? How do you know reality? The reality is Aristotle that you don't have one of these machines yet and no one does yet so who knows. So don't try to distinguish reality from fiction when no one has the knowledge yet. He is just presenting an idea, obviously your ignorance is to strong to see this.

Do photographers/designers/filmmakers want IPS? YES

Should MacBook PRO's have an IPS screen at this price point? YES

Should Macbook PRO's have much OTHER stuff at this price point? YES

Everyone and there mother can tell you that the MBP's should have i22's with OLED techonology with 5tb SSDs 64 gigs or ram but they don't. So for now we are stuck with TN sadly......

your entirely post is ignorant. I choose to be in touch with reality, not live in what ifs. I do agree though the macbook pro would be a lot nicer if it had an IPS display.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.