Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Now 2.0 Jailbreak is out will you?

  • Hell yeah JB4ME

    Votes: 66 24.4%
  • No Way, this lil' sucker is buggy enough

    Votes: 49 18.1%
  • Nah, App store is best

    Votes: 104 38.5%
  • mmmmmmm? might give it a go

    Votes: 51 18.9%

  • Total voters
    270
  • Poll closed .
So your not saying the jailbreak program is legit (see: legal) but somehow you defeated my claim that reverse engineering (which made the jailbreak program not legit/legal) is illegal? No, you didn't defeat anything.

So you say.

Read the law yourself. read Title 17 of the USC Code 1701. Better yet, I'll slap you upside the head with it:

Reverse Engineering. -

* (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)(1)(A), a person who has lawfully obtained the right to use a copy of a computer program may circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a particular portion of that program for the sole purpose of identifying and analyzing those elements of the program that are necessary to achieve interoperability of an independently created computer program with other programs, and that have not previously been readily available to the person engaging in the circumvention, to the extent any such acts of identification and analysis do not constitute infringement under this title.
* (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b), a person may develop and employ technological means to circumvent a technological measure, or to circumvent protection afforded by a technological measure, in order to enable the identification and analysis under paragraph (1), or for the purpose of enabling interoperability of an independently created computer program with other programs, if such means are necessary to achieve such interoperability, to the extent that doing so does not constitute infringement under this title.

* (3) The information acquired through the acts permitted under paragraph (1), and the means permitted under paragraph (2), may be made available to others if the person referred to in paragraph (1) or (2), as the case may be, provides such information or means solely for the purpose of enabling interoperability of an independently created computer program with other programs, and to the extent that doing so does not constitute infringement under this title or violate applicable law other than this section.

* (4) For purposes of this subsection, the term ''interoperability'' means the ability of computer programs to exchange information, and of such programs mutually to use the information which has been exchanged.

There you go. Reverse engineering: Entered into Ch. 12 of the DMCA of 1998, legal and updated as of January 5th, 1999.

and asking how I know the hackers didn't ask for Apple's permission?

Yes. I am asking. Unless you know something that everyone else here does not, you have no room to talk about illegalities. The law is spelled out (twice now), yet you don't have anything here to refute it.

BL.
 
tempting, there is an app that I really want. the ability to block specific calls! ;)
maybe, we'll see:D
 
No, I jailbroke my 1st gen iPhone and honestly there aren't that many useful apps.. many are pointless and I would rather get apps that I know are stable and won't mess my phone up from the AppStore, many of the jailbroken apps are actually available in the AppStore too, plus I like my warranty :)
 
tempting, there is an app that I really want. the ability to block specific calls! ;)
maybe, we'll see:D

It's called iBlacklist. It used to be in Installer, but pwnage doesn't have it anymore and I don't know what's going on.

would rather get apps that I know are stable and won't mess my phone up from the AppStore,

Haha HAAAA. :rolleyes:


Oh and enough with the legal bs. Who cares.
 
Yeah, just what the internet needs, another pointless pissing contest.

Here, here. Both sides of the jailbreaking issue need to take a chill pill. It's your own phone..if you want to do it great, if not, great. Why insult each other?

As for me, I will NOT jailbreak only because whenever I did that sort of stuff with my old WM devices it just led to poorer performance, and frankly, the 'customization' is just not worth the time and effort for me.
 
First off, why are you calling me 'kid'. Secondly, MMS will NEVER be added by Apple. Steve Jobs said himself it is an outdated technology, why then would he insist on adding it? Also video game emulators will never be on the App Store, so have fun buying games at 10 dollars a pop.

ummm I never mentoned anything about video games. I HATE video games

just move along people...
 
ummm I never mentoned anything about video games. I HATE video games

just move along people...

Jailbreaking adds stuff to the iPhone that Apple never will add or haven't added yet. There is no harm to anyone in jailbreaking a phone you own. Why do you care so much anyway? If you don't agree with jailbreaking just don't do it.
 
Not until the 3G unlocker is out. I don't care about running non-approved apps on my phone. I just want to be able to use it outside of the US WITHOUT having to pay ridiculous roaming charges. Local SIM card FTW.

agreed
 
My Priorities

1) Jailbreak
2) Change Appearance (see attached)
3) Change UI Sounds
4) Tether to MBA at Starbucks
 

Attachments

  • Springboard2.0.jpg
    Springboard2.0.jpg
    125.4 KB · Views: 81
re:

I will be unlocking my 1G iPhone with 2.0 so that I can use it on Virgin Mobile. I've only just purchased the iPhone though so I'm abit nervous of doing it wrong. As is said above, I also don't care for apps, I just want to be able to use Virgin's (pun not intended) offers.

And @ the above, Starbucks have been offering free Wifi for an age. Atleast three months. I've been using my itouch sat on a conviniently placed bench on the street outside.

Ben K.
 
No, I jailbroke my 1st gen iPhone and honestly there aren't that many useful apps.. many are pointless and I would rather get apps that I know are stable and won't mess my phone up from the AppStore, many of the jailbroken apps are actually available in the AppStore too, plus I like my warranty :)

Yeah. People will be complaining when their jailed beaked phone stopples working and they cant get support.

The app store is the best approach.



Oh and enough with the legal bs. Who cares.

ahh some little kid who wants to do what he wants to do. You will care if you break the law and get arrested.

Yeah, just what the internet needs, another pointless pissing contest.

haha well theres anough of that on the net....
 
Yeah. People will be complaining when their jailed beaked phone stopples working and they cant get support.

The app store is the best approach.





ahh some little kid who wants to do what he wants to do. You will care if you break the law and get arrested.



haha well theres anough of that on the net....

i never did jailbreak my phone before but you sound like a whiny little girl please stop. please don't post in the thread if you don't agree with it
 
re:

can you unlock the carrier, without having the installer? As apove, I don't care for 3p aps.

Ben K.
 
So I gave in and did it. Now, I try to download apps from the installer, and it says I have to get sources. How do I do that?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.