7770K, 8 core? Are you sure it is Intel's product? 😉The hexcore xeon Mac Pro I got in 2010 has about the same power as my 4770k. Maybe I'll get a 7770k 8 core and just divvy up the ports and cores as needed.
7770K, 8 core? Are you sure it is Intel's product? 😉
7700K. And highest core count is 4C/8T.
My bad, I didn't know kaby lake wasn't going to do an 8 or 10 core like the i7 6950k and the various 5xxxK.
On the plus side, kaby lake will hopefully push down those prices!
Prices for what? Everything we know about Kaby Lake is that it has exactly the same price point as Skylake. Because it is fundamentally THE SAME architecture, on slightly improved 14 nm node. 200MHZ higher core clocks, without any improvement in IPC, and maybe 3% better power efficiency.On the plus side, kaby lake will hopefully push down those prices!
Prices for what? Everything we know about Kaby Lake is that it has exactly the same price point as Skylake. Because it is fundamentally THE SAME architecture, on slightly improved 14 nm node. 200MHZ higher core clocks, without any improvement in IPC, and maybe 3% better power efficiency.
Only thing new will be Skylake-E/EP. But that is due Q2-Q3 2017.
That is correct. Everything slated for 2017 release is produced on improved node.Iirc skylake ep will use the improved 14nm node. Cant recall where I read that.
Please, stop basing arguments on never-to-be-reached mathematical peak performance.No it would not. 75W GTX 1050 Ti, has 2.15 TFLOPs of compute power. Radeon Pro 460 at 35W has 1.86. Downclocking the GTX 1050 Ti to 35W Thermal envelope will give AT BEST the same exact performance.
Read again. I do not think you have understood the post. Unless you are saying that GTX 1050 Ti in 35W TDP would not achieve performance level from Radeon Pro 460. Then yes, most likely you are correct.Please, stop basing arguments on never-to-be-reached mathematical peak performance.
If MacRumours would let me make a filter that said
IGNORE((member == koyoot) && (body CONTAINS tflop))
I'd use it in a heartbeat.
I just could buy a new GTX 980 Ti for $370 for my eGPU.
No more waiting for Pascal drivers.
Where can you get one that cheap?
Great deals to be had on the 980 Ti. It remains one of the most powerful GPUs for Mac OS. I found an open box GTX 980 Ti Hybrid at MicroCenter for $331. The liquid cooling system is amazing. I ran benchmarks on it for nearly an hour and the temp never got above 56 C degree.
View attachment 679367
So the Thunder2 is still the easy bet with Sierra and MBP16?
Unfortunately yes. It's the only Thunderbolt eGPU enclosure I've tested which works fully in both macOS and Windows for my 2016 MacBook Pro.
The Thunder3 is partially functional in macOS and works very well in Windows 10.
The Node does not work in macOS at all for external GPU. It is running well in Windows 10.
Has AKITIO made any official comments on the Thunder3 eGPU for 2016 MacBook Pro?

GTX 1080 vs GTX 1070 vs GTX 980 Ti in a Mac Pro: http://barefeats.com/gtx1070.html
GTX 980 Ti beats GTX 1070.
View attachment 679544
I'm considering 2x 1070's in a PC for Cuda work. That reduced power draw and heat makes a big difference in a single enclosure.
I can attest to the lower TDP in the GTX 1070 as an advantage. I tried both a reference cooler GTX 980 Ti and a founder edition GTX 1070 inside a Asus G20AJ. The 980 Ti was heating that computer up within 10 minutes of heavy use. The GTX 1070 would run for hours without issues.
View attachment 679553
Has AKITIO made any official comments on the Thunder3 eGPU for 2016 MacBook Pro?
I read your article here.
https://www.theitsage.com/thunderbolt-3-egpu-late-2016-macbook-pro/
Is their a reason that Apple has nixed the eGPUs on the market? Are they going to make one?
My experience with a GTX 980 Ti was pretty much the same as yours. I tried using a GTX 980 Ti in my hackintosh briefly and it was enough to cause my CPU temps to increase by several degrees Celsius even at idle. I went back to my old GTX 980 everything was cool again.