I've never seen a GFX card with that cable linking the front to the back. What's the deal with that anyway?
Looks like it is driving whatever port that is on the back (outboard) side of the card.
I've never seen a GFX card with that cable linking the front to the back. What's the deal with that anyway?
WOW! Comes with it's own cooling fan. That thing must scream!...
Wait, HOW BIG IS THAT THING?!![]()
Only a $400 iApple tax. Wonder if it ships with a big jar of Vaseline?
Thank goodness the other 30 professional video card that PC users have to choose from aren't available.
They would probably carry a $1-2K iApple tax. Magic Billions in the bank.![]()
I'd say it's connecting the dvi/hdmi port to the card
How about you wait until it's actually for sale until you bitch about the price? Last time I checked, "suggested retail price" is often a lot different than what retailers actually charge.
890 million triangles per second is an awful lot of triangles. Impressive![]()
How about you wait until it's actually for sale until you bitch about the price? Last time I checked, "suggested retail price" is often a lot different than what retailers actually charge.
Yeah, after looking into it further, perhaps I should revise my statement. This is a workstation card, after all, and this is a mac product, so of course there would be a mac tax.Well, the Radeon 5870 is about $300 for PC folks, yet we still have to pay $450 plus tax. So by a similar margin, we Mac folks have to pay more for the Quadro card as well.
Yeah, what the hell would I do with that many triangles?
What I don't get is how can hardware be optimized for graphics? Are graphical functions different on the hardware level to non-graphical functions? Why can't someone just have a very powerful CPU with lots of RAM, and dedicate a certain percentage (depending on demand) of the CPU and RAM to graphics? Why would that (it's obviously the case) result in lower performance? It's all just bits, I would think that bits resulting from graphical operations are still processed the same way as any other bits...
I've never seen a GFX card with that cable linking the front to the back. What's the deal with that anyway?
What I don't get is how can hardware be optimized for graphics? Are graphical functions different on the hardware level to non-graphical functions?
Why can't someone just have a very powerful CPU with lots of RAM, and dedicate a certain percentage (depending on demand) of the CPU and RAM to graphics?
It's because it's a double height card. The cable goes into either a hdmi or dvi port. Probably wasnt room to put it any lower down, so having the cable was the only option to get it to fit around the massive heatsink/fan.
Engadget notes the PC-version is around $700 without any elaboration re: any differences. http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/16/nvidia-brings-the-fermi-packing-quadro-4000-to-the-mac-pro/