Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I second the OP's prediction that the Mini 2 will run on a lesser CPU than the regular iPad. It's very Apple-like - give the more expensive product an edge with simple hardware and software differentiation.

I don't know if the Mini sells more than the regular iPad, but sales don't really equate into this. In Apple's mind the Mini is a "lesser" product, for the simple reason that they placed it at a lower price point. Because of this there will always be hardware differences between the two iPads. They will match the screens in the next iteration (pixel count-wise), but they'll still need other differences to justify the price disparity. I suspect the Mini 2 won't have a 128GB option, for instance.

I've been behind on my rumors but I thought the latest rumor was that the iPad Mini this year will NOT have a retina, but the iPad Mini next year (2014) will.

Of course it's all rumors, so we don't know for sure but thought it would be interesting to talk about this too :)
 
Doesn't apple sell more ipad mini then big ipad? Why can't the mini 2 have the Same power as the big ipad. A7 or A7x

The ipad mini is apples second flagship device next to the iphone


Also the big ipad has no competition , the ipad mini does with the new nexus 7

Cost most likely and they do need to be able to entice you to upgrade to the more expensive models.
 
I've been behind on my rumors but I thought the latest rumor was that the iPad Mini this year will NOT have a retina, but the iPad Mini next year (2014) will.

Of course it's all rumors, so we don't know for sure but thought it would be interesting to talk about this too :)
The rumors on this topic are mixed. Some sources say that the Mini will have a retina display in October, others are saying early 2014. The late July 2013 release of the updated Nexus 7 with a retina-like display is what caused people to speculate that Apple will push its timeline forward and that the iPad Mini will receive a retina update this year, since the Nexus 7 competes directly with the Mini.

I certainly hope that it happens sooner rather than later.
 
The rumors on this topic are mixed. Some sources say that the Mini will have a retina display in October, others are saying early 2014. The late July 2013 release of the updated Nexus 7 with a retina-like display is what caused people to speculate that Apple will push its timeline forward and that the iPad Mini will receive a retina update this year, since the Nexus 7 competes directly with the Mini.

I certainly hope that it happens sooner rather than later.

The WSJ reported that Mini 2 will have a retina display. I'm not sure what more definitive word people are looking for.

Anyone who has been in the game long enough knows that WSJ is directly fed info by Apple. The news was broke this year the day that Nexus 7 was launched. A total coincidence, right? ;)
 
I'd also predict the iPad 5 will starts at 32GB then 64GB and 128GB. I make no sense for them to make the 16GB as there will be 4 models, that's too many I reckon. Unless they're dropping the 16GB price but I don't see that happen.

Regarding the AC wireless, I'm not too sure about that because the 5s doesn't have an AC Wifi. I also don't see the benefit of having AC on the iPad at this stage.

CAN'T WAIT!!!!

I really have my fingers crossed that the iPad5 will start at 32GB.

As for the guessing game on the AC WiFi with the iPad5 my thoughts are that they have more room to play with and that people use their iPads in an home or office environment more-so than the iPhones so it would would be more practical for the iPads. I realize that I'm reaching here but it would be nice if the iPad's had WiFi charging ability ;)
 
They could have the current ipad mini in plastic colors and price it at $229. $100 off like the iphone 5c/s but with a A6 chip

And then have the retina ipad mini at $329 with space grey and white silver plus A7 or A7x plus finger print scanner

No way this is going to happen. We have been reminded by the iPhone 5C that Apple is all about maintaining profit margin. A plastic case on the mini might save them, say $25? It's certainly not $100 - that's slashing almost a third off the price.

If the iPad mini 2 has Retina and Touch ID (and A6X), I think it will start at $399 for 16GB, and the iPad 5 will stay at $499 with 16GB and Touch ID.
Perhaps the current non-retina iPad mini will become the iPad Color and stay at $329 or drop to $299 with a polycarbonate shell...
 
I wonder if the move to a 64-bit architecture will negate the need for an "X" variant iPad chip.

Anyone with knowledge on how these SoC's work that could shed light on this?

I don't have too much knowledge on SoC's overall, but I can tell you right now that they're still going to use X variant chips. The A7 is 2x faster than the A6, just as the A6 was 2x faster than the A5. Graphics as well, have always been 1.5x to 2x faster. This has never changed. iPhones have always focused more on longevity, whereas iPad's (besides the mini, which has an A5 [which is why it lasts so much longer - that and no retina helps]) have been more power. The A7X would just be an over-clocked A7, so it would promote the most power, while still maintaining probably about the similar battery life to the A6X.

I also hope the big iPad starts at 32GB for $499 and goes on to 64GB for $599, etc. (Well, actually I wish for even cheaper, but I'm trying to be a little realistic.)

It sounds shiitty, but they're definitely not going to.

1) They didn't move storage capacities with the iPhon 5S (still starts at 16GB, and no max of 128GB)

2) They threw 128GB on as an option for the full-sized iPad retina. Not as a replacement. They still have 16GB, 32GB, 64GB, and then 128GB for even more than the 64GB. If they were going to replace the 16GB, they would have done it when they introduced the 128GB. And it would be contradictory to the decision they made (not to replace 16GB) if they replaced it this year.

If the iPad mini 2 has Retina and Touch ID (and A6X), I think it will start at $399 for 16GB, and the iPad 5 will stay at $499 with 16GB and Touch ID.

The iPad's won't get any touch ID's. They already have "limited" supply constraints of iPhone 5S's due to the fingerprint sensor alone!
 
I've been behind on my rumors but I thought the latest rumor was that the iPad Mini this year will NOT have a retina, but the iPad Mini next year (2014) will.

Of course it's all rumors, so we don't know for sure but thought it would be interesting to talk about this too :)

As you say, it's all rumors and I wasn't commenting on when we'll get "Mini 2". Could be next year for all we know, though I think that unlikely - as I do introducing a non-retina Mini 2 this year followed by a retina Mini 3 early next year. The whole iPad 3 / iPad 4 deal was a strange skip in the beat that probably served a purpose and need Apple doesn't have right now.

I admit I have some vested interest in a retina iPad Mini so naturally I'm more inclined to hope it'll become a reality; that said, I feel like it's the smart move for Apple. It'll keep them up with the competition; it'll match the iPhone side of things (both current and all recent iPhones have had the distinction of being "retina"); it seems to me the tech Apple feels is necessary for the transition is there and I also feel like it's the more likely step up if you compare hypothetical alternatives of "retina + A6[X]" or "non-retina + A7[X]".

To me having both seems out of character for Apple, in any case. So much so that even I think it would be more likely they release a "non-retina + A6[X]" (and as you probably understand by now, I think that unlikely).
 
The iPad's won't get any touch ID's. They already have "limited" supply constraints of iPhone 5S's due to the fingerprint sensor alone!

I believe the iPad 5 will get TouchID this year. Mini will get it next year. It is clearly a big piece of their strategy going forward in concert with iCloud Keychain.

Frankly, we hear the bit about "constrained supplies" every year about every product they ship. I'm never sure how much of that is marketing and how much is real.
 
I believe the iPad 5 will get TouchID this year. Mini will get it next year. It is clearly a big piece of their strategy going forward in concert with iCloud Keychain.

Frankly, we hear the bit about "constrained supplies" every year about every product they ship. I'm never sure how much of that is marketing and how much is real.

We heard it multiple times about the finger-print sensor though. I strongly believe it is a component that is hard to produce in high numbers, thus I still think the iPads will not get it.
 
[a bunch of sage wisdom, etc.]...

The iPad's won't get any touch ID's. They already have "limited" supply constraints of iPhone 5S's due to the fingerprint sensor alone!

You got my vote, great post. And yes, the only way anyone's gonna get their grubby little fingers on a Touch ID this year is by purchasing iPhone 5s, maybe next year... :)
 
Make the the iPad mini 8 inches and apple won't have to worry about the nexus 7 creaming it since they won't be in the same category.

Apple is staying too behind anyway, that can't compete because they were a 3 months late to the mini tablet game.

Just my thoughts take it how you want.
 
You got my vote, great post. And yes, the only way anyone's gonna get their grubby little fingers on a Touch ID this year is by purchasing iPhone 5s, maybe next year... :)
I disagree.

The touch sensor doesn't become a "killer feature" until there are many more practical uses for it (password management, multi user functionality, parental controls, payments, third party bank apps, etc.). I doubt Apple can justify a large software development effort to improve the usefulness of hardware that is only found In one device. Also, Apple won't get the type or amount of developer support necessary to make it a killer feature if it is specific to the 5S.

Supply issues aren't the big deal that some are making it. Yes, Apple may not be able to produce as many sensors right now as they would like. However, the supply issues could be caused by implementation on both the iPad and iPhone. That said, the iPad is a relatively low volume product compared to the iPhone. Apple would only require 5-10% of the total sensor supply to add the feature to both the iPad Retina and iPad Mini Retina.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if the move to a 64-bit architecture will negate the need for an "X" variant iPad chip.

Anyone with knowledge on how these SoC's work that could shed light on this?

Ultimately the X variants have largely been about bumping up graphics power to handle the demands of the Retina display. The A5X was borderline silly in that regard, the equivalent of the old 'put a desktop CPU in a gaming laptop' choice some manufacturers fell back on a few years ago. The A6X improved that in every way, largely thanks to new silicon being available.

There's going to be some very interesting speculation going on once we find out exactly what the A7 can do. Taking Apple at face value that the A7 is 'up to' 2x faster on both GPU and CPU it should theoretically be powerful enough to get acceptable performance levels on an iPad Retina display.

My own guess (and that's all anyone can do right now) is we'll see a Retina iPad Mini packing an A7 at slightly higher clocks than the iPhone 5s. The iPad will still get an A7X variant along with a push towards more of a 'pro' status maybe even including pro-level apps (Aperture and Final Cut Pro would be obvious candidates). A 'cheap' iPad option is a little harder to work out, maybe a non-retina iPad Mini with a 28nm A6 to keep costs down?
 
iPad 5
  • Mini-inspired design
  • A7X
  • Camera upgrades - Rear 8MP iPhone 5 camera, front 1.2mp.
  • Starting at $499 for 32gb
  • 64 and 128gb for extra $100/$200 respectively

iPad Mini 2
  • Retina display
  • A6X
  • Camera upgrades - rear 8mp iPhone 5, front 1.2mp.
  • Starting at $329 (no increase)

Also Macbook Pros and iMacs and Mac Pros will be updated as well as a Mavericks release date announced (Week after most likely).
 
Frankly, we hear the bit about "constrained supplies" every year about every product they ship. I'm never sure how much of that is marketing and how much is real.

I'm betting on "marketing". Although it works with me. I get myself into a frenzy thinking I wouldn't be able to buy their product.
 
I disagree.

The touch sensor doesn't become a "killer feature" until there are many more practical uses for it (password management, multi user functionality, parental controls, payments, third party bank apps, etc.). I doubt Apple can justify a large software development effort to improve the usefulness of hardware that is only found In one device. Also, Apple won't get the type or amount of developer support necessary to make it a killer feature if it is specific to the 5S.

Supply issues aren't the big deal that some are making it. Yes, Apple may not be able to produce as many sensors right now as they would like. However, the supply issues could be caused by implementation on both the iPad and iPhone. That said, the iPad is a relatively low volume product compared to the iPhone. Apple would only require 5-10% of the total sensor supply to add the feature to both the iPad Retina and iPad Mini Retina.

Good points, and I hope you're right, but I'll be getting an iPad 5 either way! :)
 
Why would the iPad 5 not get the A7X? Pretty sure that's what it'll come with. They've always released the iPad with the X version of the iPhone's current chip (I think the X just means clocked higher anyway). And the mini would have the A6 or A7 for battery life, since it's battery is much smaller than the iPad 4's. The only reason it has good battery life right now is because it doesn't have retina. Also the A6 is not fast enough to handle a retina iPad, so it's more likely to be the A7 imo.

It'll be interesting for sure. However...and I see it was just addressed...the 'X' factor has significantly more to do with the increase in graphics power. It was introduced initially in the 'new' iPad 3. It allowed double the horsepower of the current A5 GPU as well, substantially increased the size of the SoC. The new 64bit architecture of the A7----as well as its graphics power is a big question mark. It could be 'clocked down' on the CPU and GPU for the iPhone. Apple would only have to increase that clock speed with the new iPad allowing for the exact same size or SoC allowing for the thinner form factor anticipated...and the new ISP for the same uses in the iPhone.

As far as your idea about the 'mini' iPad..."Also the A6 is not fast enough to handle a retina iPad, so it's more likely to be the A7 imo"...the A6x though could power the mini and still allow that separation between flagship iPad and the mini.

The WSJ reported that Mini 2 will have a retina display. I'm not sure what more definitive word people are looking for.

Anyone who has been in the game long enough knows that WSJ is directly fed info by Apple. The news was broke this year the day that Nexus 7 was launched. A total coincidence, right? ;)

Exactly. This is an important hint and shouldn't be regarded as a simple analyst prediction. WSJ doesn't need page hits. They've got an excellent repoire with Apple. With the release of other high Rez mini tablets, Apple won't lay out another low Rez mini. Even if it takes a bit more time.

No way this is going to happen. We have been reminded by the iPhone 5C that Apple is all about maintaining profit margin. A plastic case on the mini might save them, say $25? It's certainly not $100 - that's slashing almost a third off the price.

If the iPad mini 2 has Retina and Touch ID (and A6X), I think it will start at $399 for 16GB, and the iPad 5 will stay at $499 with 16GB and Touch ID.
Perhaps the current non-retina iPad mini will become the iPad Color and stay at $329 or drop to $299 with a polycarbonate shell...

While I agree with your assumptions that the mini will get the touch id and the A6x, Apple hasn't ever increased their pricing on iOS devices in their short history. Keep in mind, the A6 is now a year old and stock shouldn't be a problem. Even if they take a few % points in BOM vs profit, I think Apple will make the move...the mini is one of their least profitable products as it is but to maintain its lead on the competition, Apple can't afford to increase the price OR release a LowRez screen.

Tl;dr...no increase in price even though iPad mini gets the 'retina' treatment.

You got my vote, great post. And yes, the only way anyone's gonna get their grubby little fingers on a Touch ID this year is by purchasing iPhone 5s, maybe next year... :)

Completely disagree. The main iPad WILL receive touch ID. It's hard to say with the mini, but I wouldn't be surprised if that was next year. Like the 5c, the mini may not get the fingerprint system

Make the the iPad mini 8 inches and apple won't have to worry about the nexus 7 creaming it since they won't be in the same category.

Apple is staying too behind anyway, that can't compete because they were a 3 months late to the mini tablet game.

Just my thoughts take it how you want.

Good thing they're just your thoughts. The iPad mini/iPad sold almost 20 million units in the final quarter of 2012 alone. (Over ten times the total sales of the original N7) --- The Nexus 7 will not and is not going to cream the mini. There are a string of issues with the current hirez Nex7 as it is. Right now. Visit android central for the challenges. And battery life....& continued lack of app support for tablets in the Android arena. Sad really as its a steal at its price. That said (I've got one of both, the original Nex7 and the new version), its not a smart move for Apple to change their screen size on the mini...@ 7.9" already it's pretty close to your request of an 8" tablet and it's the perfect device to read in either portrait or landscape. The Nexus essentially needs to be used in landscape. Portrait on the Nex7 is pitiful.

I disagree.

The touch sensor doesn't become a "killer feature" until there are many more practical uses for it (password management, multi user functionality, parental controls, payments, third party bank apps, etc.). I doubt Apple can justify a large software development effort to improve the usefulness of hardware that is only found In one device. Also, Apple won't get the type or amount of developer support necessary to make it a killer feature if it is specific to the 5S.

Supply issues aren't the big deal that some are making it. Yes, Apple may not be able to produce as many sensors right now as they would like. However, the supply issues could be caused by implementation on both the iPad and iPhone. That said, the iPad is a relatively low volume product compared to the iPhone. Apple would only require 5-10% of the total sensor supply to add the feature to both the iPad Retina and iPad Mini Retina.

While I agree completely with your sentiment that the future iPads (@ least the big guy) will get the finger ID...I think your margins are a bit off. While they definitely sell more iPhones than iPads, its not 5-10%. Closer to 50% (again, fourth quarter sales of iPhone, approximately 38mil---iPad sales same quarter, right at or just above 19mil.). They don't break out which is which (mini vs large) so it's hard to figure how sure some folks are that the mini outsells the main iPad by such a significant factor. Understandably the mini in 2012 was definitely a 'new' product and in high demand, the iPad 4 an internal upgrade to the only 6 month old iPad 3 @ the time. So the yearly large iPad upgraders...some may have sat out the '4' update in order to wait the '5' out. While the 4 is definitely a big performance update to the 3--- by no means is the 3 showing its age or having issues with any of the currently available iOS software.

If you were talking about 5-10% of the iPad sales being the 'big' one...again, I think it's higher than that...and if Apple updates the iPad design to more match the mini's design....I think Apple could be in for a freaking MONSTER sales season this holiday quarter. iPad retina mini. Redesigned iPad major...the two new iPhones and an update across the board to Haswell in their computer lineup...the MBPs and the iMacs, it could be record setting.

J
 
Last edited:
The new 64bit architecture of the A7----as well as its graphics power is a big question mark. It could be 'clocked down' on the CPU and GPU for the iPhone. Apple would only have to increase that clock speed with the new iPad allowing for the exact same size or SoC allowing for the thinner form factor anticipated...and the new ISP for the same uses in the iPhone.

The A7 certainly is clocked down. However the reciprocal, would the A7X. I guess you could call it a normal clocked A7, but probably over-clocked slightly to what it would normally be. Yeah I do agree that the X typically houses much greater graphics potential. My hunch is, (although it can be neglected because it's not akin to apple's usual methods) they will use the A7 in the mini, which would keep battery satiable, and also maintaining status quo graphical capabilities.

My big knock on the A6X being in the mini would be battery life. I'm fairly certain the A6X would produce worse battery life then the current A5 that is there now. And with that loss of battery life, plus the retina display, battery life would result in a steep decline. With the casing rumored to be the same thickness, I don't see that really being a viable option.

As far as your idea about the 'mini' iPad..."Also the A6 is not fast enough to handle a retina iPad, so it's more likely to be the A7 imo"...the A6x though could power the mini and still allow that separation between flagship iPad and the mini.

See above
 
iPad Mini 2
  • Retina display
  • A6/X
  • Wireless AC
  • Camera upgrades
  • New Apple Cases ($29)
  • Starting at $329 (no increase)

Would absolutely love to see a dock! Now with Apple releasing the docks for the 5s/5c, a Lightning iPad and iPad mini dock would be great!

..Shouldn't have took a year tbh!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.