Does someone with a copy of the new version mind checking this? I know it sounds silly but if it doesn't have this feature it might actually be a dealbreaker for me.
Yes it is. It's in Preferences
Does someone with a copy of the new version mind checking this? I know it sounds silly but if it doesn't have this feature it might actually be a dealbreaker for me.
I don't want to sound like a prude. But you couldn't have worked too hard seeing as you intentionally excluded Exchange 2003 support - basically the only way I can connect to work email without using my work laptop unless I stay on Entourage. I like Entourage and all - it's functional, but I can never go to anything better as long as Microsoft ignores backwards compatibility.
shootermac said:So i start with a clean address book on a Win 7 machine running Office 2010. I import the address book into outlook on the PC, moments later the address book appears in Outlook 2011 on the Mac, however missing about 4 entries (to be honest I cant be certain they are actually missing, I haven't had the time to go through 200+ contacts to be certain). I know that in Outlook 2010 the total contacts count is 229, and on Outlook for Mac it shows 225. I have deleted multiple times.
jaoki said:Could anyone check if Excel 2011 goes beyond the 64K rows limit of the 2008 version?
stepandy said:Outlook will not start. Crashes with a following error
bryanck said:Is font size handling improved? Something that always bugged me about Mac Office was that fonts looked much smaller when viewing a document on a Mac than when viewing on a PC. If you increased the font size or adjusted the zoom level so it looked OK on the Mac then the font was huge when viewed on a PC. Font size handling in Entourage was especially messed up - you'd send an email that looked fine on your Mac and the recipient would get it in a huge looking font when viewed on a PC in Outlook. Any improvements here?
gopherhockey said:I have the full release version and opinion is mixed. We are a big Microsoft Exchange shop and I'm finding free/busy information not updating correctly vs. Office 2010 for Windows, or Outlook Web App/Access.
metalblaze said:Folks, do you have any information if the Mbox database from 2008 Entourage will be compatible with 2011 Mac Outlook? Assuming 2011 Mac Outlook uses PST files, It will be real cumbersome if one will be required to transform Mbox to PST...I had to do the reverse (PST --> MBox) when I moved from Office 2003 (Windows) to 2008 Office (Mac).
NoahC,
Are you saying that it works to move the outlook files from Windows to the MAC. I would love to move over all my saved genealogy emails from my pc. Thanks Darlene
Outlook checks spelling automatically. If you've got a spelling error, it's shown by a red dotted line underneath the misspelled word.
(Adding multiple rooms)
This is something we're looking at addressing in a future release. I totally feel your pain -- there are hundreds of meeting rooms here, and I'm frequently looking at a bunch of them to see if one is available at the time when I want to hold a meeting.
We have to draw a line. We can't always maintain backwards compatibility. In this case, just as we did with the preceding Entourage for Web Services, we drew the line at supporting WebDAV (which is to say, we don't support Exchange 2003). Exchange 2003 is losing market share every day, and market share for Exchange 2007 and Exchange 2010 are growing every day. Supporting Exchange 2003 would have meant drastically cutting down in the resources that we could spend in otherwise making Outlook to be an awesome application.
If you open up your address book in Outlook Web Access, how many contacts does it show? I'm curious if you have a few contacts that are only in your Outlook for Windows address list, or if Outlook:Mac is the only client that's missing these contacts.
One easy way to figure out what the discrepancy is would to be add a category to your all of your contacts on Outlook for Mac. Let that change propagate to the server, then go into Outlook for Windows and look to see which of your contacts don't have that category. Maybe that will reveal something that those four contacts have in common.
Excel 2008 supported 1 million rows and 16k columns, a feature that we imaginatively named "Big Grid". This is the same amount as supported in Excel 2007 for Windows. Excel 2010 for Windows kept the grid at the same size, and Excel:Mac 2011 does too.
Since I assume you got your copy of Outlook from your university or company via a Volume Licensing agreement, and haven't taken advantage of some of the (ahem) questionable and rather unsavoury ways to procure Office 2011 that I've seen mentioned in this thread, I'll point you towards IT at your company/university. Their first question will be to check whether the other applications launch correctly, and their second question will likely be to ask whether you've uninstalled and reinstalled to see if that makes a difference.
This is a difference in how Windows computers and Macs display stuff. Windows displays at 96dpi, whereas Macs display at 72dpi, which results in fonts looking like they're a different size.
Could you call your Microsoft account rep and see if they can troubleshoot this issue? We aren't aware of any issues like this with Exchange, and you're right that this is something that we want to get right, so I'd love to get to the bottom of this.
Yes, you can import from Entourage 2008 (as well as Entourage 2004, and Entourage for Web Services) into the new Outlook. We haven't left our existing users out of the fun.
Regards,
Nadyne.
Quick question: can you run both Office 2008 and Office 2011 side to side? It would be useful, unless 2011 is really bug-free.
EDIT: I mean, install 2011 without uninstalling 2008.
We have to draw a line. We can't always maintain backwards compatibility. In this case, just as we did with the preceding Entourage for Web Services, we drew the line at supporting WebDAV (which is to say, we don't support Exchange 2003). Exchange 2003 is losing market share every day, and market share for Exchange 2007 and Exchange 2010 are growing every day. Supporting Exchange 2003 would have meant drastically cutting down in the resources that we could spend in otherwise making Outlook to be an awesome application.
We haven't left our existing users out of the fun.![]()
I agree completely. Without Exchange 2003 support the new Office Mac is worthless to me and many others in the same boat we are in. Sorry MS, you blew it this time, and I have no reason toe ver consider you again. You had your chance.Draw it at Exchange 2000. You know, the one NOBODY uses. Or, at least download an optional patch down the road to enable this support to assist companies who are migrating. THAT makes Outlook an awesome app on Mac - when it can do EVERYTHING the PC side can do. Failing in any one area reeks of just plain not caring, I'm sorry.
Anyway, I've been told there is no plan to go to 2007 Exchange because "...there's no reason to upgrade Exchange, 2003 works just fine". So there it is. Entourage for the foreseeable future.
Hello:
No Outlook connector for Hotmail yet?
I like to Synchronize my Hotmail account with the new Outlook for Mac... the only way is POP3 but that's not good, I'm missing all of this options:
With Outlook Hotmail Connector and Outlook 2010, you gain these additional benefits:
- Your Safe Sender List/Blocked sender list/Safe Recipient lists are synchronized between Outlook and Hotmail.
- Send/receive works like your other Outlook accounts.
- Your Hotmail account status appears in the Outlook status bar.
- Rules work with the Hotmail account in Outlook even if it’s not your primary account.
Hope some of the Mactopia read this and do a Connector for Mac version.
Yes, you can collapse the toolbar and just have a title showing.
Agreed. All I see here is a giant, jumbled mess.
![]()