Quick question for the launch day buyers:
If the iPhone had been released in March and you had still bought in June, would you still be wanting the $200 back?
By my calculations it cost you less than $4 per day for being an early adopter. The iPhone was released 68 days before September 5th, and the last 14 days will get the new price. That leaves 54 days where people are inelligible for the new price. Why do you all think you're entitled to $200 back? Shouldn't you really get $4/day after launch you bought it so that the people who bought 16 days ago and only had a couple weeks use before the cut are given more of a rebate since they essentially got more screwed than someone who bought it at launch?
Did you get $4/day worth of enjoyment out of your iPhone? If you did, suck it up, and realize that companies are all going to charge as much as the market will allow for any product at a particular time and place. Do drug companies owe me a boatload of rebates since I could have gotten all of my prescriptions cheaper in Canada? Does DirecTV owe me rebates since Sunday Ticket is cheaper in Mexico?
When deodorant goes on sale at Target for $1 off a $3 stick do you go to their customer service desk and demand a rebate for the 33% difference?
Apple's policy has always been 14 days, sure it sucks when you bought 15 days ago, but if you give concessions to the 15 day purchasers, what do you do for the 16 dayers? or 17, 18? Where do you draw the line? Apple drew it at 14 days and really should stick to their guns on this and hold their ground. I'm actually willing to bet that a lot of the people complaining would have still gladly paid $200 extra to have it for these past 68 days even if Apple had announced that they were going to slash the price 2 months after launch. What are you going to do when at&t start offering subsidies on the iPhone and you can get it for $200 with a 2-year contract?
If the iPhone had been released in March and you had still bought in June, would you still be wanting the $200 back?
By my calculations it cost you less than $4 per day for being an early adopter. The iPhone was released 68 days before September 5th, and the last 14 days will get the new price. That leaves 54 days where people are inelligible for the new price. Why do you all think you're entitled to $200 back? Shouldn't you really get $4/day after launch you bought it so that the people who bought 16 days ago and only had a couple weeks use before the cut are given more of a rebate since they essentially got more screwed than someone who bought it at launch?
Did you get $4/day worth of enjoyment out of your iPhone? If you did, suck it up, and realize that companies are all going to charge as much as the market will allow for any product at a particular time and place. Do drug companies owe me a boatload of rebates since I could have gotten all of my prescriptions cheaper in Canada? Does DirecTV owe me rebates since Sunday Ticket is cheaper in Mexico?
When deodorant goes on sale at Target for $1 off a $3 stick do you go to their customer service desk and demand a rebate for the 33% difference?
Apple's policy has always been 14 days, sure it sucks when you bought 15 days ago, but if you give concessions to the 15 day purchasers, what do you do for the 16 dayers? or 17, 18? Where do you draw the line? Apple drew it at 14 days and really should stick to their guns on this and hold their ground. I'm actually willing to bet that a lot of the people complaining would have still gladly paid $200 extra to have it for these past 68 days even if Apple had announced that they were going to slash the price 2 months after launch. What are you going to do when at&t start offering subsidies on the iPhone and you can get it for $200 with a 2-year contract?