Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Two weeks to ship? Something better happen soon...
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2009-10-03 at 4.54.49 PM.jpg
    Screen shot 2009-10-03 at 4.54.49 PM.jpg
    101.4 KB · Views: 815
Dammit Scotty! I need more power! (or at least two more cores...)

Still crossing my fingers and hoping for a quad core..

I am most interested to see what CPUs and Chipsets Apple uses. I am predicting Penryn across the board to be able to stick with Nvidia GPUs until they can figure out what to do with the Arrandale/Intel integrated graphics problems.
 
You called what? There is no full disclosure of what the new computers will be. Let's just wait and see the entire lineup announcement. I'll pick up an iMac either way, a new one or the last iteration.
All signs are pointing in one direction, and nothing is going towards anything substantial, so as far as i'm concerned it's a done deal. We have heard no other announcements or events so it can't be anything big. I called that most likely all that would change is how thin it is.
https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=8554340#post8554340
 
good find, my apple store still has the imacs at 24hrs to ship.

I've been checking over the past few days, and this is the first time I've seen this. It is still 24 hours in the regular store, but two weeks in the edu store. Eh, who knows. Apple, my productivity is going down the crapper here. Release something already!
 
Two weeks to ship? Something better happen soon...

Which store was that? US still has 24 hours.

EDIT: Never mind, US Education. Wonder why the education has 2 weeks but the regular store has 24 hours...

EDIT EDIT: What moshimoshi3000 said
 
If Macs weren't hot and underpowered enough, now they're going to make them even thinner and more underpowered? The thinner a computer is, the less powerful it can be and the more cooling it takes, which also takes room. The issue isn't with thinness, it's with being so thin you can't fit any good hardware. My Macbook of 2 years ago heats up during Youtube videos, even web browsing. Can't imagine how hot they'll be now, unless Apple has invented some new cooling technology, which I doubt.
 
Touche. Still is more appealing to the general customer though than "quad core."



I don't even know what "quad-core processor" means besides having something to do with the number 4. How does it enhance the quality of the computer beyond the technology already in use? If you compare computers today to ones even just 2 years ago, technology is getting to the point where you have to be a bonafied nerd to tell the difference.
I don't know about that, I'd rather have a fast computer then a thin one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-core
 
When they talk about potential Macbook upates..do you think they also refer to MBP or only the low end macbook (the white one).
 
One question that's not related to anything specific, but how's the fan sound level (noise etc) on the current iMacs?
 
One question that's not related to anything specific, but how's the sound level (noise etc) on the current iMacs?
As in how loud are the speakers? If you max it out you could probably hear it resonating through your entire house so long as the doors are open. :p
 
If Macs weren't hot and underpowered enough, now they're going to make them even thinner and more underpowered? The thinner a computer is, the less powerful it can be and the more cooling it takes, which also takes room. The issue isn't with thinness, it's with being so thin you can't fit any good hardware. My Macbook of 2 years ago heats up during Youtube videos, even web browsing. Can't imagine how hot they'll be now, unless Apple has invented some new cooling technology, which I doubt.
Great huh! Now that winter's here soon and all. :D
 
One question that's not related to anything specific, but how's the fan sound level (noise etc) on the current iMacs?


On the iMac9,1:
Aside from the usual humming from the power inverters and an occassional spastic cooling fan, it's pretty quiet. Still runs hot as hell, IMO though. I personally wouldn't mind seeing at least an move to LED displays on the iMac.
 
Thinner imac's.. Is this lowering the chance of us getting quad core and/or a decent gpu. Because if im not mistaken quad cores are obviously going too take up more room. So no doubt its going too c2d's again. :mad:
The 2.0 GHz Clarksfield (55 W instead of 45 W) is most at risk.

If we see dual cores in these new iMacs, it will be nothing but a step backwards, period.
Even if it is not an absolute downgrade it will be a relative downgrade and that is what matters.
 
When they say MacBook, does that include MacBook Pro as well?

I plan on getting a 17" MBP, just wondering when the next update will be....

:apple:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.