This "thinner" design hang-up at Apple is now officially ridiculous. Unless someone totes the iMac about and plugs it in, maybe a trucker at truck stops and such, it makes no sense to work the iMac thinner. No one is presently bitching about how cumbersome the width or weight is....
However, this might be an engineering step in a direction which will create, in 4 or 5 years, a portable desktop tablet affair.
I just wish they would give us more value in the iMac: more drives, a card slot, etc.
Who cares how many cores it has?? Over 99% of the people that buy computers can't tell one way or another or don't even know what that means. Thinner will be so much more appealing than quad core.
You're forgetting the normal ignorant computer user isn't the normal Mac user. I most certainly would like a quad-core. I wouldn't be surprised if you say the exact opposite when Apple puts a quad-core in the iMac. I care much more about performance and price then how thin something I will never move is.Who cares how many cores it has?? Over 99% of the people that buy computers can't tell one way or another or don't even know what that means. Thinner will be so much more appealing than quad core.
Yes it did, although the iMac update gave 1067 MHz FSB.Did the MacBook Pro get to Penryn before the iMac did?
I'm fairly sure the MacBook and Mac mini will stay with Core 2 (more sure than with the iMac).It seems kind of odd that Apple would update their entire consumer line except the MacBook Pro to Core i5 / i7.
Any guesses on the length of the complaint threads?I wouldn't be so quick to claim this. People are likely to be very hostile if Apple delivers another Core2Duo.
Why do so many people criticize great minimalist products like the Mac mini or the Macbook Air? I love the idea of eliminating useless things like optical drives and empty space in computers.
My next purchase will be a maxed-out Mac mini. I don't care that for "only" a few hundred more I could get an iMac or a Macbook. I don't care that it lacks a super fast graphics card; I don't play games. What it has now is plenty fast, and with 4 GB of ram in there, I think it'll do just fine on performance.
The Mac mini is simple and perfect, almost like the NeXTcube or G4 cube reincarnated. For those who hate it so much, try to understand why it appeals to people like me. There is no need for nasty comments.
Come on Apple i want the new imac to be more powerful than a dell LAPTOP![]()
Lets face it todays iMac has more power then 95% of the world even needs, 4 cores would just be icing on the cake. Gpu wise though Apple needs more then a 9400 in it.I think people are underestimating the demand for quad cores.
Just wait for Apple's marketing people to spin it and before you know it, you'll wonder how anyone got by with just a duo core in their desktop.
a dual core iMac is not going to be a good upgrade for current al iMac users. It's not a 'must' upgrade unless it's quad.
Who cares how many cores it has?? Over 99% of the people that buy computers can't tell one way or another or don't even know what that means.
99% of the people who buy computers won't care that it's 1/8 inch thinner.
You're forgetting the normal ignorant computer user isn't the normal Mac user. I most certainly would like a quad-core. I wouldn't be surprised if you say the exact opposite when Apple puts a quad-core in the iMac. I care much more about performance and price then how thin something I will never move is.
"iMac: Ultra Thin 20 & 24 inch models. From only 1099. Apple Store"
I called it. They are just going to make it thinner. I doubt anything else will be upgraded besides the keyboard, mouse and remote alongside it. Glad I purchased my iMac in June, seeing as how I really couldn't care less on how thin it is.