I just checked and didn't see a mention of "iMac Air"…am I missing something?That may be so.
In the AppleInsider discussion a couple of people have discovered Google campaigns for an "iMac Air" in Spain.
This could suggest two iMac lines, the super-slim Air variant available alongside the current iMac (speed bumped). Later on when new Intel chips are available and suitable for the iMac, the big iMac will gain them.
Big iMac will be akin to MacBook Pro in features come this time, with Firewire, maybe Quad-core or Quad-thread at least, discrete graphics, etc. But not yet ready.
iMac Air will be cheaper, but will drop features that many users deem a requirement. Thus there will be a lot of bitching.
That may be so.
In the AppleInsider discussion a couple of people have discovered Google campaigns for an "iMac Air" in Spain.
This could suggest two iMac lines, the super-slim Air variant available alongside the current iMac (speed bumped). Later on when new Intel chips are available and suitable for the iMac, the big iMac will gain them.
Big iMac will be akin to MacBook Pro in features come this time, with Firewire, maybe Quad-core or Quad-thread at least, discrete graphics, etc. But not yet ready.
iMac Air will be cheaper, but will drop features that many users deem a requirement. Thus there will be a lot of bitching.
I think you totally underestimate what people use their machines for. There are thousands (if not millions) of people out there who are using their iMacs to do video encoding, photo processing and yes GAMING.
If Apple wasn't interested in the performance then they wouldn't offer continued faster video cards and faster C2D chips.
Snow Leopard was built to take advantage of new i7 architecture and Apple should be embarrassed that they are letting another 6-12 months without putting one of these processors in the iMac (or mini).
I was really hoping for a quad core iMac that also had a matte screen option. Blu-Ray would have put me over the moon.
As it is looks like no sale from me and Apple decides that instead of being a tech innovator they would rather play it safe and simply reduce the prices on models to try to stave off defections to cheaper Windows 7 machines.
Shame on you Apple!![]()
The Mini needs a price drop.
I miss the update/pricing methods Apple used back in the 98-02 era. They would do a major upgrade to the hardware, followed by a minor hw upgrade, and then alternate between price drops and speed bumps until the next major rev. It's really disappointing to see the Mini languish, especially because it has massive potential to draw new users. If only Apple would keep it a little more up-to-date and update it in ways that matter (note to Apple: it's small enough and has enough USB ports already.)
I don't think the new macbooks will be plastic. If it is Apple probably enjoys fixing them.![]()
People need to stop bitchin, the new imac is allways better then the last imac.Im trying to think what the current one cant do???anything? Hell I use mine as a TV,Phone,game machine,internet,mail, dvd player, music device,photo storage yadda yadda yadda. Stop all the crying you bunch of baby's.
It's almost assured that there will be an entry level plastic Macbook. How is it that Apple is going to fix them any more then the current ones?
A $799 base level Macbook will sell very very well.
Thiner iMac may be intended for wall mounting! I don't have space for a desktop in my condo (950sf), but will buy iMac if they make this option user friendly. With anticipated new generation wireless keyboard and mice (as well as with the tablet) it may be a multimedia dream.![]()
Mail in 1 second, ecc.
.
MacRumors ACTUALLY posting something on a Sunday?! Wow ! Now THAT is news.![]()
MEGATON NEWS, iMac Air leaked video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH7jO7X2vw8
I don't think the new macbooks will be plastic. If it is Apple probably enjoys fixing them.![]()
It's almost assured that there will be an entry level plastic Macbook. How is it that Apple is going to fix them any more then the current ones (or any other vendors laptops for that matter)?
A $799 base level Macbook will sell very very well.
Exactly.
Current iMacs exceed the power need of 90% of the users.
The bottleneck is the hard disk, try putting a Intel SSD inside an iMac and you'll see Photoshop loading in 4 seconds, Mail in 1 second, ecc.
Sometimes nerds don't realize that people out there doesn't care about quad-cores or stuff like that. They care about how the computer behave in real world usage.
The challenge now is optimizing software and squeeze all the juice out of the current hardware (64bit, OpenCL, GCD, etc.).