Perfect amount of reaction.
You know that it's not actually called a Badboy, don't you?
The problem people are having is his repeated use of the name, and nonsensical and illogical arguments as to why his computer is better than everyone else's. His whole 'future-proofed' argument is complete rubbish.
You can't have your own definition of 'investment'. The definition is the definition. An investment tends to increase in value over time. Computers are not investments. A computer is a piece of equipment that depreciates in value over time. It is an expense, not an investment. Saying a computer is an investment is like saying a pen is an investment.
Maybe we should all just make up our own definitions for all words.... wouldn't communication be fun then?
I guess you haven't been around here long enough to really understand why people are so annoyed.
I think shambo likes the attention- he always seems to come back for more. See:
Yes. Perfect logic. Great argument.
Do you see now, Spandexman?
People's problem is the repeated use of the name? Why? What's the problem with him calling his computer a Badboy pro? As for giving non-sensical reasons, the only thing he's said in this entire thread for why he considers his computer to be the best is that he thought the 13 was too small, and the 17 is too bulky. Seems fair enough to me.
As for his definitions:
Future proofed: protected from consequences in the future, esp. pertaining to a technology that protect it from early obsolescence
He has said that his machine won't be too outdated in a couple of years, i.e. faster processor, more ram etc, whereas if he bought the entry level machine, it would be more outdated. This does seem to fit in with the dictionary definition of future-proof
Investment: the investing of money or capital in order to gain profitable returns, as interest, income, or appreciation in value.
He said that he bought the machine for his profession so that he can earn money from it. He invested money in it to do so. Ergo, an investment.
So, while the machine itself is not an investment per se, the expenditure of money was, and the difference is semantical and decidedly up for debate. The computer is the embodiment of the investment (and it's undeniably future proofed).
Oh, and by the way, people do make up their own definitions for things all the time, and that is exactly what makes language fun as well as functional.
I have been reading the forums for a few months, and know exactly what you're talking about. Sometimes he just posts for the sake of it, with no real contribution to the topic. However, in this case, his post was asking the OP why he decided to go for his computer as opposed to another one, very relevant to the convo, and then all he got was ill informed abuse.
And as for the last comment, he was saying that he calls his computer (i.e. a personal label for his possession, chosen by him for personal amusement) a Badboy Pro not just because of the screen, but because he upgraded it at the time of purchase. I fail to see anything objectionable whatsoever in that statement.
Lastly, I am aware that it's not actually called a Badboy pro, and I have been around long enough that I know what he's like. Seriously, we're not in school, when we debate I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't include rhetorical questions to imply i'm a simpleton, or throwaway statements that I haven't been here too long and am consequently an outsider to try and discredit my arguments. I'd really appreciate it if we could stay away from ad homonem.