Oh no no no, my son! Let's pretend Leopard is a Beatles CD (ironically), and you distribute it or say that you made it, etc. The RIAA will be a-knocking on your door before you say "Steve's Blue Jeans and black turtle-neck top."
Same thing for Leopard, you can't just "do what you want" because there is somethings you can't do. You can't distribute it, etc.
Linux is an OS that you can do whatever you want to do to it, because its open-source.![]()
..it just felt cheap like a cheap hairy hooker. And I sure as hell didn't feel happy sitting behind it. When I sit behind my Mac I feel a certain happiness (can't really explain that one).
And then there is this situation: you have a girl friend bring her home. You say you have a Mac. She then says "where is it?" You point to that fugly piece-o-crap and say "it runs OSX". She then says "Goodbye you cheap looser".![]()
@applemojo
do u know why i am here?
first of all i own a iphone
2nd i am thinking of buying an macbook or mbp after the redesign.
i am not here to piss u off.
well any critism is getting crushed here?
but i am only willing to pay for a macbook or pro if they are really eliminating the problems of the current series.
btw mojo could u come down from ur horse and talk like a normal person?
its so annoying that u think u are so much better because u buy apple...
that may be a reason why some people hate apple so much, not because of the product they are selling but becaue of the little freakish fanatics of this company.
apple pros: cant count all of them
apple contra: 0![]()
This is illegal and will never happen. This is EXACTLY what Apple doesn't want: it's brand diluted with an ugly product full of bargain-bin components to appeal to the wellfare market. No thanks.
I definitely agree with you.The reason OS X works so well is because Apple knows exactly what hardware it runs on. If you put OS X on other hardware you quickly start to have problems.
Sorry, but there's no way this can go through. It's not even a good idea, IMO. I mean, cr@ppy hardware with poor support --you get what you pay for, as we all know-- would lead to potential bad experiences for users with machines that overheat, lock up unexpectedly, and so on. This is probably in part the reason Apple doesn't want clones any more, anyway. Jobs was right to kill them off and retain a good brand experience from start to end. Just my opinion.
nah i am not saying u are all fanbois here...
but a constructive discussion should be allowed... what the most of u are doing but people like applemojo are just dooming everything which hasnt the apple logo on it.
Drop me a note about 1 week after you purchase a Mac and I am sure you will completely understand what I am saying here.
Speak for yourself. People are unethical because they dont follow your strict standard of morality? Or are you basing ethics solely on laws? That would be ridiculous. It would be pretty easy to point out how incredibly stupid and flawed that kind of ethical standard is, one just has to look at nazi germany or a government sanctioned slave trade. Laws do not equal ethics and someone who breaks the law is not automatically an unethical person.Digital content theft and / or breaking software licenses is easy to do and causes people to not feel like they are doing anything wrong. Sitting at home in their socks sucking on coffee, just isn't the picture we associate with thieves and criminals.
What happened to morals and ethics? ... and don't give me the crap about big business and their morals and ethics, because _you_ don't have to buy their products. If I don't like a product or company I don't buy from them. Simple.
ugly product full of bargain-bin components to appeal to the wellfare market.
Well... sure OpenMac is $400 and Mac Mini is $600 (which is 150% more)
Speak for yourself.
People are unethical because they dont follow your strict standard of morality? Or are you basing ethics solely on laws? That would be ridiculous. It would be pretty easy to point out how incredibly stupid and flawed that kind of ethical standard is, one just has to look at nazi germany or a government sanctioned slave trade. Laws do not equal ethics and someone who breaks the law is not automatically an unethical person.
People are not just making themselves feel better by making excuses either, believe it or not but some people think that once they buy something that its theirs to do whatever they want with and that its unethical for a company to say they cant. Software licenses mean nothing to most people, whether they break them or not they just dont care what they say, theyre going to do what THEY think is fair with it and nobody is going to stop them.
If you have ever ripped a single mp3 from a cd or made a mix cd or taped something from the radio then you are an unethical person by your standards. The RIAA says youre not allowed to do that, if you want the RIAA to dictate your moral fiber then thats your perogative.
People dont like mac pro's and they dont like mac mini's so they dont buy them. Apple doesnt have hardware they like so they make their own PC and put OS X on that. Simple.