"Given some output on these forums", which is what I stated above.
So if majority of the opinions on this forum are in a similar situation as you, who have not personally reviewed a physical device, used it or own it that opinion is just a claim, where is they substantiation and what does that say about you for just reiterating those claims of others. I asked you if you have personally used or own the device that you are stating that the quality is not on par and instead inferior.
Usually not to "enhance" an image because the taking of the picture is akin to a lens looking through a dirty window.
How do you believe Apple accomplishes “bokeh” or beautify, etc. These are enhancements (subjective) to an image. Once again have you personally reviewed the device or own it and tested it’s front camera to make such a claim that it is like “looking through a dirty window”.
Do you believe all vendors claims as such? You're certainly welcome to, that is your preogative.
Depends on what it is, however it seems you believe unverified claims from forum members vice actually waiting to give it the benefit of the doubt. Like a disgruntle employee. Plus one cannot forget false or misleading advertisements and claims.
So basically a new product with updated specs, means the manufacturer failed on the prior release? That doesn't track.
No it means the prior generation was not acceptable and failed at that attempt. TouchID gen 2 was perfect, if it was not we would have gen 3. Why would Apple or any other manufacturer focus on something if it is perfect, it is illogical.
That's certainly a brilliant deflection, discussing emotional status and then moving on to something off-topic.
Certainly not bothering me if the quality is on par or worse, I do applaud Oppo for it’s implementation and innovation. Had Apple did this, my opinions and feeling would be the same. I believe FaceID is good, not perfect like TouchID gen 2, however Apple will get there. I just feel it is taking longer than usually considering iPad Pro has an edge over in this area.
Because this was another deflection?
Not quite but you are entitled to your opinion.
Claiming is an opinion. Or are you maybe confusing some fact based evidence with an opinion?
Oppo has tested it out, made the required adjustments and has made the claim. It is their product their are liable for false claims. Can you say you have personally tested this Oppo device, if not it is your claim and opinion that you are confusing as fact or is it the that of other forum members are you so stated in your earlier posts.
What the heck does liquid retina have to do with anything? You have stretched the line between an honest discussion about this "technology" and throwing anything against the wall to see what sticks.
Providing an example for comparison within the same tech space, I think you are mistaken to what “sticks to the wall” means.
Oppo claims their under display camera tech is on par, you disagree. I point out that Apple believes that LiquidRetina lower resolution will not be an issue for iPhone Plus users as a comparison of claim by the two companies who believe users will not notice.
You are eager to disclaim zippo without personal evidence, which have no problem with Apple’s claim on LiquidRetina, I presume. I am merely pointing out that the benefit of the doubt has to be provided which you seem quick to believe otherwise according to opinion on this forum.
Get back to me when you have “personally” tested Oppo’s under display camera quality.
