Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
and what about the continuity activation tool? will it work on El Capitan?
 
Yay, I don't have to boot with option held down to leave the Mac sat at the choose boot method screen over night for the SSD to be idle but powered so it can run it's garbage collection :)
 
Why now? As already mentioned, hard drives are not user replaceable anymore.
What is the plan behind this move?

but at last we have external ssd's esp. thunderbolt II ssd's and these devices benefit from TRIM
this move is a little bit late -- better late than never
 
The "man" documentation for the trimforce command indicates it was introduced in OS X 10.10.4, which remains in developer testing, but forum member mikeboss has determined it is not present in the current developer build.

But note that the IOAHCIBlockStorage.kext has changed in 10.10.4 14E33b
maybe just the trim force command is missing.
 
Why now? As already mentioned, hard drives are not user replaceable anymore.
What is the plan behind this move?

For those of us that have mac laptops that still have replaceable hard drives like my mid 2012 cMBP that I put an SSD in. This way we can run an SSD in our macs without them being hobbled by lack of Trim support. I am very happy about this as I won't have to deal with disabling kext signing and risking future boot issues due to that just to have what is considered a normal feature in every other current operating system that will help maintain SSD performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: V.K.
Ha! Apple sure isn't liable for data loss using trim but don't worry, they've got you covered with their crappy HFS+ filesystem regardless of trim or 3rd party drives.
+1 about HFS+. This is good news about 3rd party TRIM support and yeh, they are certainly doing it this way to make it clear that they are not responsible for how well this is going to work. But as you say, data loss due to data corruption (which is inevitable overtime btw) is entirely on Apple. I am surprised this doesn't get mentioned more often but I personally experienced it on a number of occasions. Files randomly become unusable for no apparent reason. It doesn't happen every day or on big scale but it does happen. and with HFS+ not doing any error checking corrupted files propagate to any kind of backups you have. This is the part that sucks the most and HFS+ is to blame here.
 
Last edited:
Sucks for TRIM Enabler. As someone that saw millions lost due to Apple adding features from software we sold, I know how it can hurt. On the other hand it is great to have functionality built-into the OS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grandM
+1 about HFS+. This is good news about 3rd party TRIM support and yeh, they are certainly doing it this way to make it clear that they are not responsible for how well this is going to work. But as you say, data loss due to data corruption (which is inevitable overtime btw) is entirely on Apple. I am surprised this doesn't get mentioned more often but I personally experienced it on a number of occasions. Files randomly become unusable for no apparent reason. It doesn't happen every day or on big scale but it does happen. and with HFS+ not doing any error checking corrupted files propagate to any kind of backups you have. This is the part that sucks the most and HFS+ is to blame here.

You obviously have little experience really dealing with various formats. If HFS+ is a problem, you don't have it too bad. But please tell us about your obscure formatting option or one that is far less efficient and why you know better than a huge team of developers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cisco_Kid
Most SSD manufacturers have garbage collection built into their controllers that cleans up during idle time. Those that stress their SSDs with lots of read/write will find more value in the Trim Enabler.
Trim and garbage collection are technologies that work well together. They are not mutually exclusive. Without TRIM, the garbage collector is far less efficient. TRIM is the only way for the SSD to know which blocks are free. Garbage collection does not do this. SSDs store data in what's knows as "clusters". These are essentially groups of blocks of data. The SSD cannot free individual blocks, just entire clusters. Garbage collection compacts data into as few clusters as possible, so that it can clean up the empty blocks. Garbage collection has no way of knowing which blocks are empty without the OS telling it. If it doesn't know, it ends up moving around free blocks, thinking there's still important data in them. You need TRIM on any SSD, even SandForce, to get the best performance out of it.

Garbage collection works better if you have TRIM enabled as well.
https://www.cindori.org/trim-vs-garbage-collection/

TLDNR: Without TRIM, the drive doesn't 'know' that data has been deleted until the system gets around to trying to re-use that space. Garbage collection will still work without TRIM , but will waste time preserving and consolidating data that has actually been 'deleted'.


Also note that - at least with some types of garbage collection - you must take steps to ensure that it gets idle time to run (especially if its the system drive in a laptop that gets powered down when idle to save juice). See: http://forum.crucial.com/t5/Crucial-SSDs/My-SSD-used-to-be-so-much-faster-What-happened/ta-p/118310
True words. People hear "garbage collector" and jump to conclusions about its purpose. There is no reputable source that has ever claimed garbage collection does what TRIM does, even if it's often repeated on the internet.
 
Last edited:
Why now? As already mentioned, hard drives are not user replaceable anymore.
What is the plan behind this move?
OS X drivers do not support TRIM, if you have a 3rd party SSDs in the MacBook Pro and MacBook Air. Apple uses probably standard PCIe connectors in the future, which means lower costs for the consumer and for Apple.

From:
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015...e-interface-that-will-speed-up-your-next-ssd/

“Intel's new Broadwell CPUs and their chipsets include native support for M.2 and PCI Express boot drivers—neither PCIe-connected storage (hi Apple) nor the M.2 connector itself are new, but beginning with Broadwell systems each of those two things will become much more common.

See also
https://encrypted.google.com/search?num=30&q=m.2+2280+ssds+512+GB
 
Last edited:
Sucks for TRIM Enabler. As someone that saw millions lost due to Apple adding features from software we sold, I know how it can hurt. On the other hand it is great to have functionality built-into the OS.

Enabling Trim has always been a free part of Trim Enabler.

And Trim Enabler was created from the start as an alternative to running a Terminal command. The whole purpose of it is to offer a better user experience, and it will continue to do so in El Capitan, utilizing this new improved functionality.
 
Last edited:
As an owner of a 2012 Mac Mini with a 500GB spinning platter...


236648.jpg


I'm pretty sure I am looking forward to this Fall.
 
A good step, and it's frankly embarrassing that it took this long for just semi-official support. Windows has had this on by default since Windows 7...
 
  • Like
Reactions: HVDynamo
Has anyone in real life shown that trim actually makes a difference in a non-server system?

Yes. There are plenty of benchmarks out there on the net, Google is your friend.

If you take the point of view 'but benchmarks aren't real life', then your real life impression of speed is subjective and that's no way to present empirical data.

Trim also reduces SSD wear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: V.K.
Finally!

Hopefully I wont offend anyone - Apple has jerked us way too long with this issue and I am not thankful that they got around to something that should have come months and months ago. Apple may do some brilliant things but they also are getting notorious for abandoning some things, getting to others late and if we are to pay an Apple Tax, at least do us the courtesy and take care of the obvious in a timely fashion. Quite amazing how Apple has become the new Microsoft with jerking users around.

Anyone talking about an Apple Tax... I just can't take them seriously. Not that I or anyone else will be offended, but like, I worry you might not even know you're a troll.

I mean, either you're buying Apple because you think it's the best, in which case it's worth every penny, or you're a poser buying Apple to look cool. The former acknowledges trade offs and has faith in Apple's proven successes while the latter is just grumpy they aren't using Windows and running around complaining about Apple Tax, planned obsolescence, or other conspiracies du jour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cisco_Kid and CarlJ
after examining the relevant system components in cappy and 10.10.4 preview, i m not 100% sure if that was meant to be public. we'll see if it really stays. however they are really jumping through hoops to enable trim for 3rd party devices. whyever they do it that way, its really fanciful.
 
You obviously have little experience really dealing with various formats. If HFS+ is a problem, you don't have it too bad. But please tell us about your obscure formatting option or one that is far less efficient and why you know better than a huge team of developers.
obscure formatting option?! far less efficient? what in the world are you talking about? I am talking about HFS+ which is the only file system I use. Its deficiencies with regards to data integrity are well-known and I am hardly the first person to point them out. yeh, I am by no means an expert on file systems but I know that some modern ones like ZFS do perform error checking on access. It's high time Apple developed a replacement for HFS+ that would do that too. At the very least that would prevent corrupted data from being silently copied over backups which is what HFS+ does. and I couldn't give less of a damn that some huge group of developers think it's ok for my data to get corrupt overtime with no effective way to stop it.
 
Last edited:
Finally!



Anyone talking about an Apple Tax... I just can't take them seriously. Not that I or anyone else will be offended, but like, I worry you might not even know you're a troll.

I mean, either you're buying Apple because you think it's the best, in which case it's worth every penny, or you're a poser buying Apple to look cool. The former acknowledges trade offs and has faith in Apple's proven successes while the latter is just grumpy they aren't using Windows and running around complaining about Apple Tax, planned obsolescence, or other conspiracies du jour.

well, I use a macbook because the other options I have would a pc with windows and/or linux, and that sucks big time for what I need. But, that being said, Apple is the largest BITCH ever appeared on the history of planet erath. It's not an apple tax. But hey, it's so much better than the rest. But still.

I give thanks to google and the nexus phones every day of my life, so I don't have to use an uber expensive second had iphone 5 with such a tiny display ;-) I wish OSX had such a competitor as ios has with google, it would make osx ten times better. Apple can make it, but they just dont need it.
 
Of course I have been using trim enabler for a few years now, and registered it to access the full features last fall. But good news anyhow.
 
obscure formatting option?! far less efficient? what in the world are you talking about? I am talking about HFS+ which is the only file system I use. Its deficiencies with regards to data integrity are well-known and I am hardly the first person to point them out. yeh, I am by no means an expert on file systems but I know that some modern ones like ZFS do perform error checking on access. It's high time Apple developed a replacement for HFS+ that would do that too. At the very least that would prevent corrupted data from being silently copied over backups which is what HFS+ does. and I couldn't give less of a damn that some huge group of developers think it's ok for my data to get corrupt overtime with no effective way to stop it.

Amen. Face it guys, Apple is slacking in OSX big time. They could do it so much better, just if the market could push them a bit, but that won't happen any time soon. They don't even want to broaden their market share making slightly cheaper laptops, they just want to stay is their niche and luxurius ala BMW of computers with their 13% marketshare, with uber expensive pro laptops and an operating system that is just a third of they are able to do...
 
Someone noted that the work around for rootless mode maybe removed before shipping - I wouldn't be surprised if Apple end up having some sort of way to enable TRIM via the disk utility during installation time or something which will enable the more technical people have access whilst ensuring that the unwashed masses don't hose their machine.

As for the whinging about the HFS+ file system I see through the various posts - CoreStorage will eventually step up to fill that role so lets chill out and enjoy what is provided already.

Long overdue.

Maybe now they can fix the green button problem by making it maximize to full available screen while still showing the dock and file menu.

Hold down the option key and you'll find that the green button will change from the 'full screen' to the + 'maximise' button.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.