No kidding ....
I mean, Vista took 2x the amount of disk space for an installation as Windows 7 did, despite 7 having more features than Vista built into it! It was also considerably slower booting up/shutting down, and lagged in intensive disk I/O operations.
Are we *really* saying Lion is going to use up 2x the drive space of Snow Leopard while offering fewer features? Are we expecting laggy disk I/O performance and far slower boot/shutdown times than Snow Leopard? I think NOT on all counts!
I mean, Vista took 2x the amount of disk space for an installation as Windows 7 did, despite 7 having more features than Vista built into it! It was also considerably slower booting up/shutting down, and lagged in intensive disk I/O operations.
Are we *really* saying Lion is going to use up 2x the drive space of Snow Leopard while offering fewer features? Are we expecting laggy disk I/O performance and far slower boot/shutdown times than Snow Leopard? I think NOT on all counts!
If you think that Lion is to Snow Leopard as Vista was to XP, you have obviously not tried the Lion GM. Why do you bother to demonstrate such blatant ignorance?