It's official, we are now a theocracy. Can we start a fund to help pay this guy's fine? 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/underpass_virgin_mary
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/underpass_virgin_mary
jayscheuerle said:He should have spray painted a big penis there and the diptych would have been complete...
leekohler said:Ha-ha! Yes! That would have been great. Seriously though-I'm glad someone finally did it.![]()
stubeeef said:That will be the same feeling microsuk lovers have when someone finally hits OSX with a virus, and to distrupt the "cult" of apple.
leekohler said:The difference is-we aren't fools.![]()
stubeeef said:Hey wait a minute, what's that I see..............could it be..........is it...........it's the Virgin Mary on your house! Really I see it, look, on the front of your house, and over there on you other guys building...........wow, hope nobody comes to burn it down.![]()
stubeeef said:I was not into the whole stain thing, but what real harm was it that some people saw something that made them feel good.
It is always easy to destroy, much more so than to create, the painter man was just another version of a troll.
leekohler said:Uh, gee- I though it was really frightening that a bunch of grown adults would go and pray to a salt stain on an underpass and that the mainstream media would actually cover it. Doesn't say much for our collective IQs. Also says bad things about where this country is heading.
stubeeef said:That is what no one here gets, they weren't praying TO a salt stain, they were praying TO God, and to the Virgin Mary. The stain made them think about someone important to them.
Like I pointed out in the previous post, becareful which destroyers you cheeron, for the next sighting might be on your house.
I agree that the guy who did the defacing was in the wrong - whether it was this or a billboard promoting Longhorn. In fact, although I might think these people are a little crazy for seeing this, I have no issue with them finding some solace in a random salt stain.stubeeef said:I was not into the whole stain thing, but what real harm was it that some people saw something that made them feel good.
It is always easy to destroy, much more so than to create, the painter man was just another version of a troll.
emw said:I agree that the guy who did the defacing was in the wrong - whether it was this or a billboard promoting Longhorn. In fact, although I might think these people are a little crazy for seeing this, I have no issue with them finding some solace in a random salt stain.
The issue I saw was that the state (in the form of police, barricades, traffic control, etc.) took it upon themselves to disrupt the lives of others (those wanting to use the underpass for that it was created) in favor of the relative few who wanted to pray to this vision.
This is, after all, public property, not private grounds.
emw said:The issue I saw was that the state (in the form of police, barricades, traffic control, etc.) took it upon themselves to disrupt the lives of others (those wanting to use the underpass for that it was created) in favor of the relative few who wanted to pray to this vision.
This is, after all, public property, not private grounds.
stubeeef said:I was not into the whole stain thing, but what real harm was it that some people saw something that made them feel good.
It is always easy to destroy, much more so than to create, the painter man was just another version of a troll.
leekohler said:Oh no- I get it. It just really scares me. BTW-can't you pray to God anytime, anywhere? Why do you need to stand in front of a salt stain and disrupt traffic to do it?
emw said:The issue I saw was that the state (in the form of police, barricades, traffic control, etc.) took it upon themselves to disrupt the lives of others (those wanting to use the underpass for that it was created) in favor of the relative few who wanted to pray to this vision.
This is, after all, public property, not private grounds.
Chip NoVaMac said:So true. When we need it, we tend to find Faith is the strangest of ways.
It may have been a salt stain, but it provided comfort to those that may have needed the comfort. And who is to say how visions are to appear? It distresses me that so many are unwilling to allow acceptance for what others see as potential proof of their Faith.
I wasn't sure what you meant there until I saw a better view of the image.jayscheuerle said:He should have spray painted a big penis there and the diptych would have been complete...
leekohler said:You know- I usually agree with you, but a salt stain as potential PROOF of one's faith? PROOF? Come on- that's a stretch.
And again- I really don't care what makes people happy, but I don't think you should be disrupting traffic flow and using state resources to do it. If the guy who painted over it is getting fined, every one of those people should be fined for disrupting traffic flow.
I am in no way rejecting their beliefs, nor am I condoning the actions of the person who painted over the stain.Chip NoVaMac said:And there lies the problem. How do we balance the needs of all with the needs of the few. Do we only allow our own beliefs to be accepted, and reject those that we don't understand or accept?