I fail to follow....
More people buy Android phones.... aren't they the lemmings?
Of course!
I fail to follow....
More people buy Android phones.... aren't they the lemmings?
I hope it doesn't go too high. Whats the point of having a better product than someone else, if everyone has an iPhone.
Too late, they're already the phone I see everywhere. Steve got his wish, blue tooth wearing silver hair grandparents are clutching their iPhones as though they're so bloody important. It's a hilarious sight. Anything to be "cool".
The iPhone is 5% worldwide... 10% in the US... I think it still has a long way to go until it's everywhere.
Also... Windows is 90%... does that make it cool?
Here's my proof: http://connectedplanetonline.com/mo...-Android-peers-showing-platform-matters-1011/
Now go back to picking lint out of your belly button...
----------
It doesn't really matter as long as there are so many lemmings in the world.
It's a well-known fact that half the populations is below average intelligence, so they can't recognize a better thing when it comes along and will buy whatever the other lemmings buy.![]()
Let me ask you this: Who the hell cares?
Why is that every smartphone statistic has to turn into a fanboy war?
You guys DID forget that in one of Steve's interviews he says by his analysis that people use apps for information/purchases more than the browser when using the iPhone.
I don't see many iPhone users starting or replying to threads in an Android fan site accusing the Android fans buying their Android phones because of "coolness". I see the other way roundLet me ask you this: Who the hell cares?
Why is that every smartphone statistic has to turn into a fanboy war?
I can't imagine some people still accuse iPhone owners for buying iPhones purely because of "coolness", wow.... don't live in a cave, it's 2011 now.
----------
I don't see many iPhone users starting or replying to threads in an Android fan site accusing the Android fans buying their Android phones because of "coolness". I see the other way round.
Welcome to capitalismI can't imagine some people still accuse Android owners for buying Androids purely because of "cheapness", wow.... don't live in a cave, it's 2011 now.
p.s.
Brand, or rather identity shopping is huge. Apple is no exception. No wonder either. People seem quite soulless nowadays.
To Apple fantards
27% of the market using a highly consistent, well integrated and matured product economy (iPhone) beats 44% of a fractured and inconsistently integrated multi-vendor product line (Android) any day.
There are good devices in the Android realm, and some dogs and poor cousins. Lumping all vendors as one against iPhone skews the relative fairness of the chart (an observation, not a complaint). As a consumer I'm not bolted to every product Apple makes, but I like most of it and use it if I can. I like the idea of Android and it's interesting to see the variety of devices using it, but few are directly comparable to iPhone, the numbers might be more like: iPhone 27% vs equivalent Android devices 10% (more? less?).
4.6% growth for Android compared to .8% for iOS? Ouch. Looking forward to how the fanboys are going to argue that a slower growth rate and a lower market share is actually better for Apple.
Android suffers from the same problem that ultimately spelled doom for earlier Smartphone platforms: Possession without utilization.
That 24% of the market that uses iPhones makes up by far the largest share of online data usage. Meaning that iPhone users - in general - are far more likely to find value in owning the phone and the service.
Symbian and RIM, the previous smartphone market leaders, also at one point had very high levels of possession. But their use of data services was generally very low. This implied that the value of their platform was correspondingly low, and hence vulnerable.
Thats the problem Android has right now: There are a lot of Android phones in people's hands. But they aren't using them for activities that benefit Google, or the people who develop Android applications.
Having more marketshare is a great bulletpoint on a chart... but it means little in the grand scheme of things.
I fail to see how this is impressive. I'd guess 90% of U.S Personal Computer users are now on Windows. That's fairly impressive.
If the iPhone hits 50%, I'll begin to be impressed.
Wrong site.
I think you meant to go here:
http://www.winsupersite.com/
----------
Very well said. This is exactly what's going on.
Why not use a cross-platform messaging solution (e.g. WhatsApp) that does the exact same thing but reaches say, 99% of the market instead? Same goes for Facetime, really. If anything, these proprietary jumps made by Apple are... stupid. Or rather, it is stupid that users so happily adopt them.
There was a time over 100 years ago when buying a home or business phone was questionable since hardly anyone had them too...it was like the ghostbusters song, "Who you gonna call?"
The problem you bring us will go away as tens-of-millions of new iMessage people will join you each year.
But..the more sales just means Android is more innovative, right *LTD*?
Very well said. This is exactly what's going on.
rofl... Keep looking for excuses, story shifts, imaginary friends and all that crap... Fact is you will never twist a fact. How stupid do you need to be to try to conquest that??
What fact is there to twist?
Over 10% of US mobile phone users are now on a closed, unlicensed, highly-vetted, comparatively expensive platform comprised of one or at most two models of phone.
It doesn't get much more impressive that that.
27% of the market using a highly consistent, well integrated and matured product economy (iPhone) beats 44% of a fractured and inconsistently integrated multi-vendor product line (Android) any day.
There are good devices in the Android realm, and some dogs and poor cousins. Lumping all vendors as one against iPhone skews the relative fairness of the chart (an observation, not a complaint). As a consumer I'm not bolted to every product Apple makes, but I like most of it and use it if I can. I like the idea of Android and it's interesting to see the variety of devices using it, but few are directly comparable to iPhone, the numbers might be more like: iPhone 27% vs equivalent Android devices 10% (more? less?).
I understand what you're getting at, but it's hard enough to get people to upgrade to iOS 5 let alone install and use a third party messaging app. iMessage's tight integration into iOS gives it superior usability even though it's not cross platform.
----------
"Who you gonna iMessage?" / "Not as many people as are eligible to upgrade to iOS 5!"
I don't think I really brought the problem, but I do agree that iMessage adoption will grow. And, because of its design, a lot of people will start using before they even know.
Since i cant contact most of the people using it, and thus need a fall back solution anyway, its not more usable at all. Its just the usual Apple bs. Really. Stop making excuses for it.
I actually dont know a single person who has Facetime/iMessage that use it. They all use "something else".
Skype and Yahoo have much better cross platform integration than iMessage/facetime on iOS devices.
I actually use facetime with one person on occasion but in my case it makes about 10% of all my video calls at most.
Also I use Yahoo on 3G and it freaking kills with video/audio quality.
All foreign country calls ar handled by skype and again on 3G, talk is always smooth.
Apple really wants to close that ecosystem across all devices. If you ask me it isn't working much at this time and I wonder if they have enough momentum to change this in the future. Selling a lot of devices is one thing but unless they make it cross platform it will never really click.