Bloomberg reports[/url] that Palm has placed itself up for sale, working with several partners to find a buyer for the struggling company.
I bid $1.27.
I hope I'm not overpaying.
Bloomberg reports[/url] that Palm has placed itself up for sale, working with several partners to find a buyer for the struggling company.
Who the hell would buy Palm?!!
They started a fad (Palm Pilot) but it was over in a year or so. Competition was better than their own stuff within a year (Sony, Handspring)...
Apple took their $400 device and made it a free app (Calendar) on the iPhone.
Palm didn't do squat to update their OS even though it was dead 10 years ago. I am SHOCKED that they have lasted THIS LONG!
Goodbye Palm, you were but a blip in our lives.
I bid $1.27.
I hope I'm not overpaying.
They first became popular in 1996 and then transitioned into the Treo smart phones and into the modern day Pre. Hardly a 1 year fad.Who the hell would buy Palm?!!
They started a fad (Palm Pilot) but it was over in a year or so. Competition was better than their own stuff within a year (Sony, Handspring)...
When I first got my iPhone I dug out my 10 year old Palm Pilot out of storage and tried out the two devices side by side. I'm embarrassed to say that the 10 year old Palm apps kicked the stuffing out of the modern iPhone Calendar, notepad, and contacts apps. 3 updates later and Apple still hasn't caught upApple took their $400 device and made it a free app (Calendar) on the iPhone.
Moving from a black and white 160*160 screen up to 65000 colour 480*320 resolution. Transitioning from 68000 architecture to ARM architecture. Adding wifi, bluetooth, cellular radio, external memory support. How about that complete rewrite to a Linux based system with resolution independent graphics? Yup Never updated it oncePalm didn't do squat to update their OS even though it was dead 10 years ago. I am SHOCKED that they have lasted THIS LONG!![]()
Yes, I'll miss them too... Good company, some great innovations, never afraid to take a chance, but horrible, horrible, horrible marketing.Goodbye Palm, you were but a blip in our lives.
Apple. For Palms IP and engineers. Palm has good engineers but misguided direction. Apple can point those skills in the right direction and add much needed engineers so they can work on future versions of Mac OS X and the iPhone OS at the same time without straining resources.
Good company, some great innovations, never afraid to take a chance, but horrible, horrible, horrible marketing.
I think they were afraid to take a chance. Handspring (former Palm employees) made better devices because Palm was scared to try something different. Sony beat them both and was smart enough to know when to get out of the game.
Palm's phone application felt dated and slow.
Nokia kicked their ass without an OS. Blackberry kicked their ass at their own game. And Apple not only kicked their ass but made them drool like a fool.
Their problem wasn't marketing, it was VISION.
I remember commercials for the Palm Pre that were shown again and again during the remake of The Prisoner a little while ago. They featured a very strange looking actress and were downright disturbing to watch. Just awful marketing. Those commercials probably reduced demand for the Pre.
I bid $1.27.
I hope I'm not overpaying.
Apple. For Palms IP and engineers. Palm has good engineers but misguided direction. Apple can point those skills in the right direction and add much needed engineers so they can work on future versions of Mac OS X and the iPhone OS at the same time without straining resources.
Wow - thats generous!
I agree with Apple being a possibility - Right now Palms biggest asset right now is their IP library, outside of Apple, there really isnt many companies that make their own hardware and software like Palm does. RIM does that, but their focus is not really compatible with what Palm does.
Handspring == Palm for all intents and purposes. No different than how when Jobs came back to Apple he brought a lot of the NeXT IP with him.I think they were afraid to take a chance. Handspring (former Palm employees) made better devices because Palm was scared to try something different. Sony beat them both and was smart enough to know when to get out of the game.
Of course it does compared to today's iPhone. Common sense there, isn't it?Palm's phone application felt dated and slow.
Have you tried Web OS? There's a reason the tech blogs claim that Web OS is the only thing out there that is any real competition to the iPhone. Vision is hardly the problem. I hope Apple buys out Palm just so they can steal some of the vision from Web OS.Their problem wasn't marketing, it was VISION.