applemacdude said:Viagra?
rickvanr said:So this guy is a baseball player? I'm not joking, never heard of him before today.
Why not just give them all steroids so at least the fans know everyone is on an even playing field. As a strong anti-baseball fan, I will say I like ham man's and grapes911's suggestions a lot.
grapes911 said:Random drug testing for every player year round (each player will get approximately 6 test a year, but it will vary because of the randomness).
1 positive - No suspension. Drug testing every 2 weeks for rest of carreer.
2 positives - Drug testing every week for rest of carreer. No All-star game EVER. No Hall. 1 Year suspension.
3 positives - Done. No playing, no coaching, no owning, no GM, no nothing.
dotdotdot said:They don't deserve No All-Star game
Most players get a pretty big bonus for being on the All-star game. It's just another hit in the wallet.dotdotdot said:Stupid.
You can't do that, it isn't fair. They don't deserve No All-Star game, which is an exhebition game for fun and counts for nothing...
Pete Rose SHOULD be in the HoF. What he did is no where near as bad as steroids.and no one deserves no Hall of fame. What happens in 50 years when no one knows Pete Rose and in another 50 years when hes just a forgotten player. He should be in the hall.
That's not what I said. If he tests positive again, then I think no HoF is very reasonable.You're saying that Palmeiro shouldn't be in the Hall? 3000 hits!
As I see it, we have penalties for 3 reasons: (1) punishment, (2) rehabilitation, (3) deterrence. Obviously this is over kill. Sounds like punishment to me. Hopefully, anyone stupid enough will to use steroids will have learned their lesson to not use them again. We then have rehabilitation by force. I don't know how many people would use steroids if the penalties were this stiff. Deterrence.Also, drug testing every two weeks is not possibble. Thats over 24 drug tests per year. And then, if a player has a good, long fifteen year career, thats 360 drug tests throughout his career. And if he gets the 2 positives, over 730 drug tests. For ONE player!
I agree in most instances. I was glad when Scott Rolen pulled out. He was hurt most of the first half. Morgan Ensberg deserved to start and wasn't even on the team. I hate when fans vote for big names and have no idea what that player did that year. I give Rolen a lot of credit for having the class to pull out of a game he shouldn't have been voted it to. If it really was for health reasons (which is the excuse I think he gave), then so be it.Inspector Lee said:If you are voted in and/or chosen and you choose not to play, you should be void for 3 years. Many of these clowns only care about all-star appearances at contract time.
MacNut said:Raffy isn't really HOF material besides getting 3000 hits and 500 hrs. His career isn't all the impressive.
quagmire said:It is like saying, " Officer, He fell on his knife." Officer responds, " He fell on is knife 27 times?" Murderer responds, " Umm, yeah." Boo Baseball.
yoda13 said:some media outlets are reporting that he failed a steroid test. The test he actually failed was for a banned substance, as far as I can tell, MLB has not and won't say what substance he tested for. It is not necessarily steroids, thought it sure could be. I am just saying he failed a test for a banned substance, it wasn't necessarily the juice. Not that it matters a great deal, it is still bad and taints him, but I wanted to point this out.
rickvanr said:So this guy is a baseball player? I'm not joking, never heard of him before today.
Why not just give them all steroids so at least the fans know everyone is on an even playing field. As a strong anti-baseball fan, I will say I like ham man's and grapes911's suggestions a lot.
Besides 500 Home Runs and 3000 Hits? What more do you want? He's only the 4th player ever to do this. Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Eddie Murray. If 3000-500 isn't enough, then no one should be in.MacNut said:People have been arguing Palmerio's career for a while and if he should go into the HOF. Besides 500 hrs and 3000 hits how good are his stats. The bar is being raised and is just getting 3000 hits good enough anymore.
Ryan Franklin isn't even that good. Maybe he should have taken stronger steroids.MacNut said:Seattle Mariners pitcher Ryan Franklin has received a 10-day suspension under the terms of Major League Baseball's steroids policy.
MacNut said:Id like to start the debate as to why Palmeriro belongs in the Hall Of Fame. Yes he has 3000 hits and 500 homeruns. But he never won a batting tittle, lead in Homers or RBI's.
I agree. He's a Hall of Famer all the way. But (ignoring steroids) how can you put Don Mattingly in the Hall and not Rafael Palmeiro? The stats speak for themselves.MacNut said:I will always be bitter until my beloved Donnie Baseball goes into the HOF.![]()
How many of those stats are helped by the roids tho. And what about all the others who belong in the hall and are ligit who aren't in yet.grapes911 said:I agree. He's a Hall of Famer all the way. But (ignoring steroids) how can you put Don Mattingly in the Hall and not Rafael Palmeiro? The stats speak for themselves.
grapes911 said:Besides 500 Home Runs and 3000 Hits? What more do you want? He's only the 4th player ever to do this. Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Eddie Murray. If 3000-500 isn't enough, then no one should be in.
If it's still not good enough for you, then here is some more stats for you:
He is 17th all-time in RBIs,
He is 35th all-time in Runs scored,
He has a 2.89 Career Batting Average
The only thing against him is he was never on a great team. But the HOF is for individuals, not teams. Before this incident, he was a 1st ballot Hall of Famer. Now, I don't know but I'd like to know how long he's been on a banned substance.