Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I know it's not Apple's style but I personally think a lot of value comes from customer beta testing. I'm sure they have great internal QA, but far too many things are coming up with their products right after release. I think with more customer beta testing you would see less of that. They can certainly put people under non-disclosure agreements and such.
 
TwinCities Dan said:
Any data to back up those claims? :rolleyes:

Check the sensitivity setting on your sarcasm detector. That's the whole point: There IS no high return rate, and sales are NOT plummeting. We're all (or most of us) in agreement that this is largely a non-issue in terms of real world user experience. It's an issue only in other (albeit important) arenas like public perception and the company's reputation.
 
An IBM guy having trouble adjusting to Apple?

Who would've thunk it?

Exactly! Coming from a typical corporate environment where supervisors and department heads attain their position by kissing ass then no longer have to do any real work and then going into an environment where you are actually expected to know what the hell is going on probably did him in.
 
Yep..

Originally Posted by JoshBoy
"I just got an iphone 4 today and i can not replicate the issue or make it drop down in bars. By far it has better reception than the 3GS that would drop in and out of service, now i have nearly full bars."




Why not? I bought my iPhone 4 on day 1, reserved and then waited in line 5 hours for it. To this day have not been able to replicate the antenna issue. I believe it exists for some people, but not for me.

my iPhone 4 32GB has been an awesome phone, I have zero complaints.

I've been telling people since day one it's overweight people who eat a lot of greasy potato chips that cause call drops because my dry as a bone fingers can't get the darned thing to fail.
 
As an investor, I measure performance by increased shareholder value. AAPL blows doors on WMT as well as the S&P 500 over the past 5-10 years.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=5y&s=AAPL&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=WMT&c=^GSPC
Source: Yahoo Finance (AAPL vs. WMT vs. S&P 500 index over the past five years)

Raw revenue figures are often meaningless if your margins are razor thin. Apple's profit margin is over 21%. Walmart's is less than 4%.

Since you chose to bring up Walmart, I will point out that they have $8.5B in cash and almost $47B in debt liability. Apple has zero debt and over $24B in cash.


Some of your comment are surprising, coming from an investor. Yes, increased shareholder value is the ultimate metric for comparing two companies. However, neither margins nor debt matter in comparing two businesses that are as unlike as Walmart and Apple. Open any basic finance textbook and read the section on capital structure irrelevance (aka "Modigliani-Miller"). Walmart takes on a lot of debt precisely because they are in a low-margin retail sector. Walmart's entire strategy is to keep margins low and "make it up in volume." Debt financing is one of their tools, and clearly they are excellent at it.
 
As an investor, I measure performance by increased shareholder value. AAPL blows doors on WMT as well as the S&P 500 over the past 5-10 years.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=5y&s=AAPL&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=WMT&c=^GSPC
Source: Yahoo Finance (AAPL vs. WMT vs. S&P 500 index over the past five years)

Raw revenue figures are often meaningless if your margins are razor thin. Apple's profit margin is over 21%. Walmart's is less than 4%.

Since you chose to bring up Walmart, I will point out that they have $8.5B in cash and almost $47B in debt liability. Apple has zero debt and over $24B in cash.

Do you feel the need to mention you're an Apple stockholder in every thread?
 
Cultural Incompatibility is HR speak for didn't follow the Emperor's Rule. Apple is a dictatorship ruled by one man.
 
Faking it - Wall Street Edition

Some of your comment are surprising, coming from an investor. Yes, increased shareholder value is the ultimate metric for comparing two companies. However, neither margins nor debt matter in comparing two businesses that are as unlike as Walmart and Apple. Open any basic finance textbook and read the section on capital structure irrelevance (aka "Modigliani-Miller"). Walmart takes on a lot of debt precisely because they are in a low-margin retail sector. Walmart's entire strategy is to keep margins low and "make it up in volume." Debt financing is one of their tools, and clearly they are excellent at it.

But he was so happy to be able to buy his candies with his own money! Those candies leverage the risk of holding two imaginary AAPLs. Don't mock his portfolio and his ability to put a few terms into a search engine!

Do you feel the need to mention you're an Apple stockholder in every thread?

He only does it in MOST threads that he visits. I wanted to collect a few posts from cvaldes that included "as an APPLE shareholder/as an investor", but suddenly I found a few that didn't say that at all and only focused on denying that there is an issue with the iP4's reception.



Anyway, I asked the man as many before me did and he just ignores the matter, while attempting to maintain an image of somebody who matters.

But be careful with him! Apparently, he recently upgraded to a Mac Mini and he's got an iPod Touch! This Wall Street shark has got the power to play The Sims 2: Open for Business Expansion Pack!
 
Because the media can generate more newsworthy attention by making this an issue. Out in the real world the issue is non-existent, and at worst is not any different than the attenuation experienced by other phones. ...
Apple can certainly improve on the antenna design--as is true with the introduction of any new technology--but as far as I'm concerned it's rock-solid stable and as ingenious as Apple claims it is.

I concur.
This whole news coverage about Papermaster is a total BS, even from a rumour perspective. It's totally circumstantial, full of blown up speculations and totally disconnected information. Trolls just keep feeding on no-news made into helium balloons by sensationalist bloggers.

Observe this: iPhone 4 was in development since at least early 2008, and so was this new antenna design. Papermaster started to work officially at least one year and a few months afterwards. For an executive to get familiarised with the new company and its inner workings takes at least 4-6 months, and then about the same that time to see if that environment is right for him or not. He was not supposed to make changes to things that have been decided long before him.

Add to this that Papermaster was never in the iPhone launch video, never in any kind of presentation about it -- although he was a "head" of that department. That can only means he was expected to leave after the launch of the new iPhone. Otherwise he'd be there somewhere if he was really contributing to it and was planning to stay and contribute more to the company.

The news about his resignation has been made official after the international iPhone launch (we all know international networks are ways superior to AT&T and iPhone has no issues there; sorry US, it just proves once again it's the problem with you, not those little toys you don't even deserve to touch or comment about).

An executive has also a different resignation procedure -- he can't just say 'goodbye' and be gone. We're talking about someone who takes up several months just to dwell into the role. So I suspect he has resigned before the iPhone 4 launch, and was given green light to do it after the international iPhone launch, when all is done and iPhone is just selling steadily.

And that silly note that "it was Jobs who decided on this design .." makes all this story a total untrue BS. Geez, are you Americans for real? Can't you see the fallacy of this whole 'issue'? It seems only you can think that kind of rubbish is true. No engineering company works like that. Apple would be long gone if one man decides upon everything, same as every family breaks apart if only one person has the voice. It's the collaboration and good communication between members that makes healthy families, good companies and good societies stable and prosper. If you ask yourself why some country (like yours) is clueless and in shambles, just observe how segregated your society is; all parties work against each other, same as you do within your families, fan clubs, etc.

Please grow up. And stick to each other, try to better your lives.
 
How come the antenna sucks so much after rigorous testing for 2 years?

Um, because it doesn't 'suck' and actually provides superior reception for most users?
Not to mention more battery room ergo longer life.
 
... "as an APPLE shareholder/as an investor",

Most of the people here that claim they are shareholders make me laugh. Just because you have a few shares doesn't mean you can go tooting your horn like you are someone special. Some of us here have 10's of thousands of dollars in shares (IE me as an employee for 3 years most of my stock purchased at 32 a share.)
 
Apple likes its senior management staff to be "hands on" and involved in every detail of their products. Papermaster was obviously a "delegator" and felt he was above being involved in such minutiae. I bet you he reminded Jobs of Gil Amelio or the Pepsi guy. HE WAS A LAZY CORPORATE TYPE. Good-by and good-riddance.

Why have someone in the chain of command who doesn't support your vision or philosophy for your company?
 
Some of your comment are surprising, coming from an investor. Yes, increased shareholder value is the ultimate metric for comparing two companies. However, neither margins nor debt matter in comparing two businesses that are as unlike as Walmart and Apple. Open any basic finance textbook and read the section on capital structure irrelevance (aka "Modigliani-Miller"). Walmart takes on a lot of debt precisely because they are in a low-margin retail sector. Walmart's entire strategy is to keep margins low and "make it up in volume." Debt financing is one of their tools, and clearly they are excellent at it.

Save your typing fingers dude, cvaldes never misses an opportunity to bore us to death with his tales of AAPL share ownership and child-like grasp of how business works.

Do you feel the need to mention you're an Apple stockholder in every thread?

It's not just on this forum, here he is in action on CNET and Appleinsider. Imagine getting stuck in a lift with this guy.
 
In terms of PR, this is to be expected. Apple people are not about to say that Papermaster was fired because of the 4. That's the last thing they want to put out. But with all the problems (beyond just the antenna), they had to boot him.
If they consider good PR telling people that "no, it wasn't the antenna, we just didn't like the guy so we fired him. The antenna was pushed by Steve, and had 2 years of testing, so we knew it ****ing blew but we also knew it didn't matter because it would sell like hot cakes." then I don't even know what to say. Good on them for being honest?

Also, I must say, mad respect for firing people who don't fit the company culture. I am so tired of companies keeping employees that are obviously useless, because they don't want to go through the hassle of firing them. If the guy doesn't fit, say it like it is and get someone who does.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.