Theoretically yes. Windows 10 for Arm already does emulation for 32 bit apps and Microsoft is adding emulation for 64 bit apps. 64 bit emulation is in the latest test builds so you can probably google for first impressions, especially if your program is 64 bit.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Parallels 16.5 Can Virtualize ARM Windows Natively on M1 Macs With Up to 30% Faster Performance
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
unless Windows for arm becomes mainstream, which I doubt will happen any time soon due to Intels grip on PC makers and Apples performance gap over other arm chips, I can't see this being that useful. Now if it could run x86 windows that would be great
You can absolutely emulate x86 on an M1 (I think QEMU would be an option), but only emulating the portions that don't already exist on ARM anyway is more efficient.
That is interesting even though it isn't about Apple Silicon as far as I can tell. But a company like VMWare is unlikely to be running Windows on Arm publicly without some endorsement from Microsoft.
I just have a Windows gaming box in another room to my Mac now (it makes a lot of noise when gaming) and then stream the games to my Mac using Valve's Steam or Moonlight. In the long run, will probably be cheaper than signing up for a streaming service. Most of the games I have been playing this year have actually been free ones Epic has been giving away weekly from their store.
Nope, not about ASi, but just shows that there's likely some movement from Microsoft on Windows on ARM if both virtualization vendors are suddenly making progress.
Thanks. Last question, hopefully
If Windows ARM does emulation (instead of virtualization) of x86 programs, with the speed be similar to those x86 programs currently running in VM or Parallels on an Intel based Mac?
It's not really emulation or not for the most part. It is a translation from x86 (or x86-64 in beta) to Arm (AArch64). This is much like what Apple does on the M1 for MacOS x86-64 software with Rosetta 2. So Microsoft's x86 compatibility is going to be reasonably fast like Rosetta on MacOS though from what I understand it has to do more work than Rosetta because of a couple of features missing on standard Arm CPUs that Apple added to the M1.Thanks. Last question, hopefully
If Windows ARM does emulation (instead of virtualization) of x86 programs, with the speed be similar to those x86 programs currently running in VM or Parallels on an Intel based Mac?
Corellium Linux is missing core drivers such as no GPU acceleration so not production ready. Asahi Linux is even worse off with more missing drivers.
https://github.com/AsahiLinux/docs/wiki/Tasks
I'm referring to using a VM not booting natively. Ubuntu works fine.
So, bottom line on running Linux on M1 (as a user, not a hacker/fiddler) is a ways off yet. Anyone have a guess as to when an "it just works" distro will be available to run inside a VM on an M1 machine?
I'm having luck running Ubuntu for Arm without any trouble on UTM. I haven't tried Parallels but if it works in UTM it should work in Parallels (probably better because it is supported software.) Why do you think the bottom line is that Linux is a problem on Parallels?
Edit: Right now I'm trying to get UTM working as x86-64 emulation on the M1. The distributed version doesn't work. I'm hoping the dev branch works better.
I have a MacBook Pro 16 with a egpu box and a 3080 card, which has been great running all the latest PC games, I got a xbox series x at launch as my backup game system. When I can no longer run Windows 10 on a Mac and can no longer do games. I will no longer be gaming on a PC base platform. The Xbox Series X and future systems are so powerful you might as well buy a gaming console every three years at $500 for gaming.
Still going to be cheaper than a gaming PC with expensive gaming cards. I will use a Mac and its OS for personal business and work business only. A final end to Mac gaming and a home machine that could do it all.
The only hope Apple might have for gaming is if they can get VR gaming going, but Oculus has quite the lead.
Still going to be cheaper than a gaming PC with expensive gaming cards. I will use a Mac and its OS for personal business and work business only. A final end to Mac gaming and a home machine that could do it all.
The only hope Apple might have for gaming is if they can get VR gaming going, but Oculus has quite the lead.
Installed the new Parallels and a copy of the insider preview of Windows for ARM onto my M1 MacBook Air... just for fun.
Appears to work pretty well. The couple of work apps I need work fine over Citrix (better, actually, as I don't need to VPN in to the work network when running through Citrix), so I just use them that way directly on macOS. But still kinda fun to play with.
Now to find a license key for the insider build of Windows on ARM...
Appears to work pretty well. The couple of work apps I need work fine over Citrix (better, actually, as I don't need to VPN in to the work network when running through Citrix), so I just use them that way directly on macOS. But still kinda fun to play with.
Now to find a license key for the insider build of Windows on ARM...
I am a CentOS user, and am looking to switch to whatever ends up replacing it when all the dust settles. I don't know when that particular distro is going to be ready to load-and-go in a VM running on M1 hardware. Should have been more precise in my query.
If only that were true. I found it impossible to find local Accounting and Payroll software for the Mac. Most business software companies just ignore the Mac and make their Windows based apps available as online cloud based apps to placate Mac users rather than develop a native Mac app.
VMware and Dell announced today that Dell is spinning off it's stake in VMware, so maybe VMware will start catching up now.
VMware and Dell Technologies Reach Agreement Regarding Spin-Off
VMware and Dell Technologies Reach Agreement Regarding Spin-Off
You will get better results with a "PC on a Stick" computer plugged into the M1. If Someone made a thunderbolt version of one of those (most are USB-C already) that was optimized to run on the M1's port and talked to OSX, they already are close to the same price as these Virtual solutions, and many of them are preloaded with Windows 10 already (a $130 savings right there). Now these currently are probably not good enough for gaming, but somebody could make a piece of hardware that just plugged into any of the M1 or future MX series machines, that had a GPU, and used the M1's keyboards, mice, trackpads, and screen. There is probably a market if they were cheap enough.
If one uses 10 watts and the other uses 4 watts it uses 2.5x less energy. Conversely, one uses 2.5x more energy than the other. It’s relative power draw.
Yes, and games. If this makes most windows games playable on a Mac, and obviously running any regular windows application at an appropriate speed, then good bye Boot Camp.
This. Even though they frame it as a "purchase", Parallels is really a subscription because it tends to stop working with new MacOS releases every year and you have to upgrade.
If they MUST do this, I'd really rather they just bite the bullet and go full on subscription. At least then you don't have to ask yourself "Should I stay on _old MacOS version_ to save $50?"
$50 a year isn't that bad, it just shouldn't be tied to MacOS upgrades.
Also, personal licensing really should be by person, not machine.