And they're still charging the same pretty much yearly fee for this?
I think there will also be a problem with printer/scanner drivers etc?No, it really is. How many people want to run ARM based Windows? You want windows because you need to run windows applications. That almost certainly at this point means X86 applications. And Windows 10 emulating X86 inside a VM is going to miserable.
We've already seen it and it didn't look bad at allNo, it really is. How many people want to run ARM based Windows? You want windows because you need to run windows applications. That almost certainly at this point means X86 applications. And Windows 10 emulating X86 inside a VM is going to miserable.
What is supported right now?Seems like installing Big Sur in a VM is not supported yet. Sadly, that would be my main use case (security testing).
nothing?What is supported right now?
And they're still charging the same pretty much yearly fee for this?
It seems to have one success till nowWhat is supported right now?
Do not forget to sell it via subscription only...I'm going to release a competing emulator that also doesn't run Windows. In fact, mine won't run anything! Success!
MS already sells this with Azure VMs.I sense a business opportunity for running Windows VMs in the cloud...
I'm a reverse engineer and I must have Windows 7+ VMs I can test malware on. If I can't do it on my Mac, well, I'm willing to pay a third party...
No, it really is. How many people want to run ARM based Windows? You want windows because you need to run windows applications. That almost certainly at this point means X86 applications. And Windows 10 emulating X86 inside a VM is going to miserable.
I think there will also be a problem with printer/scanner drivers etc?
Is it ok for you to be depended from an installation in an uncontrolled from you location? is it also secure enough?I sense a business opportunity for running Windows VMs in the cloud...
I'm a reverse engineer and I must have Windows 7+ VMs I can test malware on. If I can't do it on my Mac, well, I'm willing to pay a third party...
Can you please try running Geekbench 5 inside?Well it does run at least. ARM Windows 10 Insider Preview running on M1 MacBook Pro
I'm going to release a competing emulator that also doesn't run Windows. In fact, mine won't run anything! Success!
I think that it is not possible.Admittedly, I haven't looked into the possibility of them tapping Rosetta 2 in some way to take advantage of that binary translation, mostly because I'm not that desperate to run Windows on my Mac(I have a Win desktop as well.... for now).
I was confident they have Windows version too (like VMware does) before reading your reply. Ouch, indeed.I feel for the Parallels folks.....
Nope, it's not going to be miserable, while slower than Rosetta, the speed is decent. Of course you want run a game in it.No, it really is. How many people want to run ARM based Windows? You want windows because you need to run windows applications. That almost certainly at this point means X86 applications. And Windows 10 emulating X86 inside a VM is going to miserable.
They have their hopes for Win10 (ARM version) but I do not know how useful it will be...I've got to believe that the vast majority of Parallel customers are running Windows in a VM. I know that's why I have it. If it can't do that (or will never do that) I have to think their future is bleak.
Geekbench report from inside Parallels VM with default settings on M1 MacBook Pro 16GB Ram: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5385616Can you please try running Geekbench 5 inside?