I agree and also take issue with this. I agree that it's tantamount to squeezing its customers with a product that works pretty well - Serguei Beloussov is a shrewd businessman and pretty smart guy (although I have more college degrees than he does - my 6 to his 4), and he runs a large investment firm. Beloussov has customers coming back for more, and IMHO Parallels is about at the end of this golden rope - they've removed features and segregated their product line relative to features to further fracture their client base for this type of product. Instead of producing a great product, Parallels has splintered its customers in the hopes of keeping us coming back for a feature "fix" (that's in a junkie fix, not a bug fix). MS should have named Windows 10 as "Windows" - Beloussov must be seeing this as a last stab to splinter the Parallels user base for one, final, year of subscriptions before we realize that Windows' and OS X's interaction have matured to the point where PD becomes irrelevant. If Windows doesn't "change" much, then Apple's Boot Camp should have most of us covered for the foreseeable future.Kinda funny how Parallels magically breaks with every OS update, requiring another hefty purchase, while other VM solutions run just fine even if they don't take advantage of new OS features... and by funny I mean highway robbery.
Parallels 9 only worked on 10.9. Had to upgrade to 10 to use it in Yosemite while other software kept running great
I sprung for the upgrade. Windows 10 is surprisingly fast with Parallels 11. I never used Windows 8 so it seemed like a waste but I will use this with Windows 10.
Not true. I have no problems running Parallels 9 on Yosemite.
Not true. I have no problems running Parallels 9 on Yosemite.
Good idea. I just submitted a refund form. We'll see..I checked the date..I bought it July 14th.
Hope it works..I really do free burned by the double upgrade...
I upgraded from 10.9 to 10.10 and Parallels 9 stopped working. I even talked to their support and they confirmed that I need Parallels 10 if I want to run my VMs on Yosemite.
Parallels 9 only worked on 10.9. Had to upgrade to 10 to use it in Yosemite while other software kept running great
. They are saying I've been breaking the EULA and I'm arguing that my key allows 2 activations, and now it doesn't. Adding a little noise to twitter and saying I'll switch to fusion. Annoyed.
Seems to me this would not work as technically the Parallels VM is a different PC then BootCamp.Anyone accessing a Boot Camp installation having trouble with Windows 10 not activating from Parallels? I can boot directly into Boot Camp without issues.
It's important to keep the Parallels app updated. If your PD9 stopped working in Yosemite, it's probably because you were not running the latest version.I upgraded from 10.9 to 10.10 and Parallels 9 stopped working. I even talked to their support and they confirmed that I need Parallels 10 if I want to run my VMs on Yosemite.
I'm in pretty much the same situation with one of my licenses, and am considering an upgrade to the discounted offer for one of the Pro subscriptions - from time to time I spend more than that yearly fee on a nice bottle of 16-year-old Bushmills.Yeh someone else mentioned similar in this thread (or another cant remember). And its one of the reason I dont want to go to PD11. I've always used the 2 activations in the past, and with them tightening the screws on PD11, the cost just goes way up really. And yes I know if buying two licenses the second is half price, but when upgrading that doesnt seem to be an option. Only solution I can see is upgrading one and paying full price for the other - meaning no benefit to me a loyal customer since PD5.
Are you running a 2015 MacBook? There is a known incompatibility that Parallels hasn't addressed in PD 10 yet. I don't know if PD 11 fixes it.Anyone accessing a Boot Camp installation having trouble with Windows 10 not activating from Parallels? I can boot directly into Boot Camp without issues.
Where I disagree, respectfully, is that I've been able to skip versions for several years - I've bought into 4,6,8, and 10 - with no loss of function. I just did a bit of a dance to get from Windows 10 32-bit to 64-bit - a bit of a PITA given MS's means of getting disk images and PD's driver "conflicts", but now I'm using a Win 10 64-bit VM that should last me at least a few years. Serguei won't be getting any coin from me this year!
I'm not picking nits and, in general, I wholeheartedly agree with your point, however, it will work for me - I run a small company, and I/we don't upgrade OSes at every tick in the OS number. Putting an older OS with an older version of PD on an SSD has made sense to me for years, and the same goes for functional software - I was still making coin with AutoCAD 11 running on XP SP3 running nicely in PD 8 years after Autodesk, et al, stopped "supporting" their products (both of my techs hate new versions of anything - I've built still-standing bridges and light rail lines with old versions of AutoCAD and Merlin and Excel! I'm only on Excel 2016 because I got a free sub to Office 365, but v. 2007 is right next to me right now on my PC). I've also got working cloned copies of XP, 8, 8.1 - and my plan is to use Boot Camp in the future as it works, it's free, and our SSD Macs and PCs boot and reboot in seconds and, with One Drive and SharePoint I'm not seeing the need to move to even PD 11 on more than one of my licenses.That's not gonna work. They force you to upgrade every two years unless you don't upgrade OS X. So just as you did 4, 6, 8, and 10, you'll also have to upgrade to 12.