pcnmac.com said:PC versus Mac was built and is maintained using MS Frontpage 2003
No freeware firewalls are available for X that provide better functionality than its built-in firewall
This guy is a joke.**The above score uses Windows XP Professional and I leave XP Home off the chart. XP Home has less features than XP Pro, and the few major areas it lacks are readily known: no membership on a domain, no remote desktop (though you can do a different form of remote desktop using Netmeeting), no credential caching, no IIS webserver, etc. If any of these areas are important to you, XP Pro and /or Mac OS X will provide some other options, but the majority of home or basic users have no need for any of these functions. I have not once had a friend, co-worker, family member, or client that uses XP Home ever comment that they were missing something that XP Pro would provide. XvsXP.com has XP Home scoring about 40 points below XP Pro and I would score it similarly. That would leave XP Home in a virtual tie with OS X on OS features alone, but then we would again add the additional variables and XP Home would leap far ahead as well.**
🙄you want to have prompt take up of new technologies.
you want firm "end of life" support dates set on your operating system.
you want to buy from a reasonably forthcoming company about their future product plans.
you want the greatest choice for purchasing music online.
you would like to see lots of new functionality added to the operating system without paying for an all new OS every year
you want a web browser that has the greatest compatibility with the greatest number of web sites.
you want a media center experience integrated at the OS level.
you want a fully 64 bit OS.
you don't want to buy an expensive Mac and then have to turn right around and buy an add-on two button, scroll wheel mouse.
you value legacy support.
you want onsite repairs from your computer maker (most of Apple's support options require you to mail in your Mac or take it to an Apple Store).
You know, that's funny. My very first cd burner was a 52x. Just a few months ago, I bought a 16x DL DVD/rw drive for $40. Is this guy too stupid to know what an upgrade is?? This computer that his friend bought, what are the other specs? What's that? Oh, a 1.8 GHz Celeron, 128 MB of SDRAM, a 20 GB HD, oh, and Windows XP Home Edition. 🙄you want to burn CDs at a speed better than 24x (no Mac ships with a CD burner faster than 24x).
you do not want to spend $1,999 to get a 16x DVD burner (the dual 2 GHz G5 tower is the cheapest Mac with 16x {a $379 PC that a friend got recently has a 16x Lite-On that also burns CDs at 48x}).
It is plain to see from the reading above: there is no mystery why PCs have 98% market share and the Mac has just 2%. In almost all cases the PC is the superior choice, but if you fit some of the few bullets under "buy a Mac", then you fall in the 2% that should buy a Mac.
if you then add the following categories, you find the gap widens even further:
price
frequency of free and paid updates/upgrades
OS choices
hardware choices
computer maker choice
reseller choice
third party software selection
third party peripheral selection
cost of support
length of support
product life cycle
education and training options
ease of purchasing the respective platforms
ease of finding technical support
free or low cost access to trial software
consistency of the OS over many years
site in question said:It is plain to see from the reading above: there is no mystery why PCs have 98% market share and the Mac has just 2%. In almost all cases the PC is the superior choice, but if you fit some of the few bullets under "buy a Mac", then you fall in the 2% that should buy a Mac.
MacDailyNews is reporting some very odd numbers when they write that the Mac has a 16% installed user base. Since the beginning of 1997 the Mac has sold just over 27 million units and the PC has sold 1,112,000,000 units (1.11 billion) giving the Mac an average annual market share of 2.44% over the last 8.25 years. Mac users would have to keep their Macs a really long time and PC users would need to put their machines in the landfill at an incredible clip to turn 2.44% annually into a current 16% installed base.
Oh god, that made me spew my soda on my lap.iGary said:He has a chat site, but I'm not giving him even my Spam bait e-mails.
His answer to questions are like this:
Windows maintenance is deplorable.
His answer:
10.3 blew up my machine.
😕
Interesting. Alle meine Freunde wie irgendwas über die Rechnere weiß, und spielen mit seine Konsole, verwenden Linux für Arbeit.. Eigentlich die wie spielen mit seine Rechnere aber kann/will nicht etwa neue lernen sind die einigste mit Windows. Aber die Leute sind doch das große Majorität auf die Rechnere verwendere.. 🙁G5Unit said:i compare both. i own both. only 2.5% of computer buyers agree with you that macs are the best. 90% + say windows on a pc is best. they speak with their wallets.
sorry.
Tahko said:Oh f*ck, I was browsing apfeltalk.de simultaneously and answered in German.. Well I just said that actually most of my friends who use solely consoles for gaming use Linux on their desktops to get the work done. Sadly most of the young population consist of gamers who need windows or people who don't want or wont learn anything new. 🙁