Originally posted by bensisko
Doubtfully..
I think the basic stratagy is this:
iTunes exsists to sell iPods and iPods exsist to sell macs.
Originally posted by macMaestro
Has someone not been paying attention?
Originally posted by l008com
So any word on that McBillion song giveaway?
Originally posted by Sailfish
If you really want to save money, buy more iTunes music and get your caffeine fix as well.
Drink Iced Tea.
It boosts your immune system 5x over coffee, you can sweeten it to your tastes, you can make it at home for pennies a glass, it has more caffeine than coffee and most soda's and it won't eat holes in your stomach like coffee and soda does.
And you won't go broke supporting your habit.
Take the money you save and buy iTunes music.
From TVs Will & Grace...Originally posted by iLilana
It's also obvious that people without credit cards lose out. I'm beginning to be a little jaded by the iTunes Music Store.
Originally posted by desdomg
By the way, SJ also used to work for HP. Anyone notice a trend developing here?
Originally posted by rdowns
Jobs never worked for HP, Wozniak did. Jobs worked for Atari. I guess by your logic, Atari will be selling iPods soon.
Originally posted by billyboy
Sorry to be boring, but, punctuation is everything!The words "and yet", in the sense of "however", should be followed by a comma.
I could most certainly argue too. Thank god "underground pop" hasn't become anywhere near as bad as mainstream pop these days.Originally posted by whooleytoo
Enrique, Beyonce, Britney Spears and Pink ... that's not a bad lineup.
Originally posted by mainstreetmark
I could argue with that.
Originally posted by jrv3034
Sorry for the mistake. In my defense, I was playing Trivial Pursuit 20th Anniversary Edition the other day, and one of the questions was:
"To whom did Steve Jobs say 'Do you want to make sugar water the rest of your life, or do you want to change the world?'" (From what I remember)
The answer was: Steve Jobs
I thought they wouldn't make things up, so please excuse my misinformation.
Originally posted by ClimbingTheLog
Isn't this a 'contest' or 'sweepstakes'? Doesn't there then have to be a "no purchase necessary to win" clause somewhere?
No Purchase Necessary. To receive one free game piece and a copy of Official Rules, while supplies last, send a self-addressed, stamped envelope postmarked on or before 3/31/04 to: Pepsi iTunes Game Piece, P.O. Box 9205, Young America, MN 55558-9205. Residents of the state of VT may omit return postage. Limit one free game piece per request per stamped outer envelope.
13. SPONSOR: This promotion is sponsored by Pepsi-Cola Company, Purchase, New York 10577. Apple Computer, Inc. is not a sponsor of this promotion.
You are NOT a winner if your game piece reveals a Play Again or Please Play Again message or is blank or partially printed. Unclaimed prizes ill not be awarded.
Originally posted by jrv3034
Not to hijack the thread with this, but it DID say Steve Jobs as the answer. I assumed it meant he told himself that in order to come back to Apple. But obviously there's something wrong since he DIDN'T work for Pepsi. I'll see if I can find the card with the question on it.
Anyways, sorry for the confusion.
Back on topic:
This Pepsi deal will reallly bring the world of Apple to the forefront of household recognition. Now we just need a new iMac G5!
Originally posted by Universe Man
I don't get it. ClimbingTheLog asks a question about the legality of a contest where you have to make a purchase in order to win, and you respond by jumping down his throat and explaining the process, beginning with buying a bottle...
That was not the question.
Originally posted by Makosuke
like the tasty ones from Stewarts or Henry Weinhard (or their new, exceedingly good Cherry Creme Soda).