It shouldn't matter where the road is - logic dictates that the best way for traffic to flow in dense traffic is by using both lanes in their entirety. This does not apply for free flowing traffic, as there is no need for any sort of efficiency due to lack of congestion.Not in the US - here, it adds to the bottleneck they are trying to skip.
#2 - People who drive past a long line only to head to the front, turn on their turn signal and try to cut in front of everyone else who waited patiently. Do you do this at the grocery store, bank, shops, etc?
It shouldn't matter where the road is - logic dictates that the best way for traffic to flow in dense traffic is by using both lanes in their entirety. This does not apply for free flowing traffic, as there is no need for any sort of efficiency due to lack of congestion.
Traffic jams are caused by braking cars in the most part. So, if the length of this braking wave is minimized, it will take a shorter amount of time for the period of braking to pass, thus getting through the merging point. Rather, if people use both lanes to the point of merging, then there will be half the length of queue for each lane, and if each car lets one car in turn into the merge, will increase efficiency, and perhaps even safety. But will certainly reduce congestion.
The only reason it adds to the bottleneck is the people in the lane they are trying to merge into being selfish, rushing forward to stop the merging (and then stopping suddenly), and thereby adding to the problem of the braking wave. If people used both lanes in equal measure there would be no problem with traffic flow.
It shouldn't matter where the road is - logic dictates that the best way for traffic to flow in dense traffic is by using both lanes in their entirety. This does not apply for free flowing traffic, as there is no need for any sort of efficiency due to lack of congestion.
Traffic jams are caused by braking cars in the most part. So, if the length of this braking wave is minimized, it will take a shorter amount of time for the period of braking to pass, thus getting through the merging point. Rather, if people use both lanes to the point of merging, then there will be half the length of queue for each lane, and if each car lets one car in turn into the merge, will increase efficiency, and perhaps even safety. But will certainly reduce congestion.
The only reason it adds to the bottleneck is the people in the lane they are trying to merge into being selfish, rushing forward to stop the merging (and then stopping suddenly), and thereby adding to the problem of the braking wave. If people used both lanes in equal measure there would be no problem with traffic flow.
Actually, if you watch their documentary showing on Pallida or whatever that channel is, you'll find that he was clear ... the band is his band and nothing more.
People who pretend not to see someone in a wheelchair on the train and not standing up to offer them their allocated space. Scum...![]()
Drivers in the middle/outer lane of the motorway traveling at 60mph when no one is around at night, refusing to go in the 'slow' lane like they should, and forcing me to undertake. GRRR, morons...![]()
He should run for Governor of New Jersey, or at least replace Bruce in the E-Street Band.
Drivers who leave their fog-lights on when there is no fog! ARGH!!!![]()
Drivers in the middle/outer lane of the motorway traveling at 60mph when no one is around at night, refusing to go in the 'slow' lane like they should, and forcing me to undertake. GRRR, morons...![]()
1. Why should it matter if traffic is light?
3. Where are you?* Where I am, the speed limit is 55mph (until I get out of the city)
Given 1 and 2 above, the person staying in the passing lane (although they're not supposed to) is doing you a favor. Since you are conforming to the law, you're in the driving lane. If the speed limit is 65mph, which you are also conforming to, of course, you don't have to change lanes to pass the slow poke.
Because it impedes the flow of traffic ...
In the UK undertaking (overtaking on the inside) is illegal, so this isn't true.
If there's no one else around, there is no traffic to impede, correct?
But, over there on a 3 or more lane "motorway" it's still illegal to pass "on the inside"?
To my way of thinking, making that illegal is pretty dumb. If someone else is ("illegally") driving slowly in the passing lane, you have to stay behind that vehicle?
And back to the 3 lane... What's the 3rd lane for anyway? Just to pass a vehicle that's passing another? Then everybody has to get back over into the one driving lane? In rush hour? And you can't pass on the inside during rush hour? That's weird! And how about allowing someone to merge from an on ramp? No room! We're all staying in this lane buddy! ?
Over here, "undertaking" is preparing dead bodies for burial or cremation and making arrangements for funerals.
People using my laptop. There's four other computers in the house and I worked all summer to buy this, I don't want you screwing it up!
People who chew with their mouths open after the age of 10. I actually just announced my crusade on twitter.
*shifty eyes to the guy I share an office with as he smack smack smacks his lunch*