Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I had the same battery issue when my 3.3Ghz touch bar MBP was new. The extremely short battery life can be caused by Spotlight Indexing when new. With the latest macOS update, I'm getting 8 hour plus battery life.

I updated to 10.12.2 immediately after I got the computer. Literally the very first thing I did. Spotlight should not be indexing anymore, especially because this computer still basically has nothing on it. Only 40GB is used (including the OS).
 
  • Like
Reactions: mkeeley
Apple that has not disclosed how they achieved the 10 hours.
IMO, for the last few years, for any product they sell where they talk about the battery life, Apple discloses their overall testing method.

Now for their notebooks, one big difference between their tests and reality is that they use stock macOS. They don't install Adobe Flash (or any other plugins) that may use more processor/battery.

Walt Mossberg usually does his own battery test that mirrors Apple's. I don't recall him saying that his test results were much different from Apple's.

  1. Testing conducted by Apple in October 2016 using preproduction 2.0GHz dual-core Intel Core i5-based 13-inch MacBook Pro systems with a 256GB SSD and 8GB of RAM (wireless web test, iTunes movie playback test, and standby test). Testing conducted by Apple in October 2016 using preproduction 2.9GHz dual-core Intel Core i5-based 13-inch MacBook Pro systems with a 512GB SSD and 8GB of RAM (wireless web test and iTunes movie playback test) and preproduction 2.9GHz dual-core Intel Core i5-based 13-inch MacBook Pro systems with a 256GB SSD and 8GB of RAM (standby test). The wireless web test measures battery life by wirelessly browsing 25 popular websites with display brightness set to 12 clicks from bottom or 75%. The iTunes movie playback test measures battery life by playing back HD 1080p content with display brightness set to 12 clicks from bottom or 75%. The standby test measures battery life by allowing a system, connected to a wireless network and signed in to an iCloud account, to enter standby mode with Safari and Mail applications launched and all system settings left at default. Battery life varies by use and configuration. See www.apple.com/batteries for more information.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: paulh69
Phil is wasting his time here. He's dealing with a bunch of half-wit bozos who are hardly qualified to review toilet paper or deodorant, let alone computers. Best to leave the idiots alone. Nobody care about CR anyway, their test methods (if they even have methods) are probably so bizarre and unrepeatable that they have no value.

CR has always been out to destroy Apple, ever since their iPhone 4 fake news stories. IGNORE them, they are worthless. If you want to know if the MBP is any good, check the MacRumors IBP forum, or wait for Anand's review. Anand has been reviewing PCs + HW for 20+ years (ever since he was in high school). CR has been reviewing chocolate bars and pizza slices for the past 50 (?) years. Who do you trust?

Apple obviously disagrees with your assessment of who cares about CR, by their response. Likewise you must also give them a great deal of credit by your response. Just a review that will either prove to have merit or not.
 
At the bottom of any page on Apple that mentions a products battery, they disclose the majority of how they do their tests.
Though that is my point, why should they be allowed to quote pre-production units that are now what was shipped to me. That is false information is it not? Tests were not performed on the machines shipped.

How many people checked the fine print ? They trusted apples claims when made on stage. And if the rumours are true that apple changed batteries at the last minute, these tests are not valid at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9081094 and Xi Xone
This is an easy thing to answer. Your experience has not been the typical experience of many other people.

Hi Vertical Smile:

This is your signature: "
Mac Plus / Performa 550 / Performa 631CD / Power Mac 6300 / iMac G3 / iBook G3 / Late 2003 iMac G4 17” / iMac G5 / PM G5 dual 2.3 / Mac Mini G4 / Mac Pro 1,1 Running Mav / Mid 2007 iMac 20” / 2011 MBA / Late 2012 iMac 27”
iPhones x 9 / iPads x 2 / iPods x 7 / ATV 1 2 3 4
Favorite One: iMac G4
"

It appears you do not own a late 2016 MBP15. How can you possibly make a comment on battery life?

Donald Barar
 
Last edited:
Try to use your AW series 2 to adjust the AirPod volume during a phone call.

That does not work ?

No, it does not. You can do it for music though, just not a phone call.

Currently, the only way to adjust volume on the AirPods during a phone call is directly from the phone it self, which basically contradicts Apple's own AirPod site saying that you can leave your phone in your bag while taking calls, playing music, and controlling volume.
Screen Shot 2016-12-24 at 1.34.45 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Jobs would never have let a gimmick like touchbar out of R&D, let alone Apple Watch and this MacBook (Air) Pro
 
Yes I expect them to do more testing considering they got such wild variations. It's one thing if they were consistently getting poor battery life but in some tests they were getting almost double what Apple claimed. I'm not aware of any other reviewer's that had such a wide variation.

No other reviewers do so many battery tests on multiple units.

There's a reason their report came out a month after everyone else.
 
More and more we see these facepalms from Apple regarding the Mac.
I recently found out that the MBP lost it's line in function an iteration back. What is the point of that? Most all sound chips used in laptops contain both line in and out functions. It literally costs them nothing to maintain the status quo on that feature. However I bet some market research 'informed them' that only 7% ever use the feature so they deleted it.
Likewise for removing Kensington lock slots from various products.
Likewise for removing HDMI from the Macbook Pro-C.
The cynical move of obscuring the battery time left through an update is the worst. It just shows that they have little regard for the computing segment of their customer base. As it represents a smaller part of their revenue than mobile devices.
I see no leadership at Apple.
 
They didn't recommend them because of the huge variation. But that's begs the question why would they eve put out a review without nailing down why they were getting such variation? The obvious answer is clicks. Saying they can't recommend an Apple product gets their review more attention and clicks.

It's not the job of Consumer Reports to troubleshoot products. Their job is to use them as a consumer would, and report the results. That's it. There is no due diligence necessary beyond that.
 
Hi Vertical Smile:

This is your signature: "
Mac Plus / Performa 550 / Performa 631CD / Power Mac 6300 / iMac G3 / iBook G3 / Late 2003 iMac G4 17” / iMac G5 / PM G5 dual 2.3 / Mac Mini G4 / Mac Pro 1,1 Running Mav / Mid 2007 iMac 20” / 2011 MBA / Late 2012 iMac 27”
iPhones x 9 / iPads x 2 / iPods x 7 / ATV 1 2 3 4
Favorite One: iMac G4
"

It appears you do not own a late 2016 MBP15. How can you possibly make a comment on battery life?

Donald Barar

I do not own it, and I was not commenting on my own experience. In no way does my post say that I own the 2016 MBP.

I was referring the many other posts on this forum and others. I was referring to the many news/rumor articles on this site and others. I was referring to Apple's own statements about people have battery life issues.

Is it not okay to comment on my observations? You commented on yours.
 
Apple didn't rush anything out the door. Consumers rushed out their doors to get a piece of the "action".
 
Imagine this scenario at the next Fall Mac event...

"You know, for many years now, Apple has led industry hardware design in several ways, but one way in particular has come to be expected in every hardware generation: we've made our products thinner and thinner and thinner while maintaining key metrics important to our customers. That's very hard to do but we've been successful at doing it for a long, long time.

There comes a point though where the laws of physics trumps continuing to thin some of our products. For the last year or two, we've continued to prioritize thinner beyond those laws by removing things that some of our customer's tell us they miss. One thing we hate to do above all else is disappoint our customers.

So, today we are doing something revolutionary for the Apple you've come to know... today we are launching the next generation of Mac laptops that... are... thicker. Yes thicker. By adding just a few millimeters to the size- less than the thickness of 3 dimes stacked on top of each other- we are able to fill that space with more battery and more RAM. This MacBook's bigger batteries run not for 8 hours, not 10 hours, not 12 hours but 14 hours on a single charge.

And not just in our own lab tests. To talk about that, we're happy to have the most objective product review company on Earth here today. Help me welcome <name> from Consumer Reports to the stage.

The CR guy them comes out, talks about getting a pre-launch review model to put through their tests, makes a joke about Apple's demands for absolute secrecy and then confirms 14+ hours of battery life in CR testing.

Is that an abhorrent fantasy sequence? Would any of us HATE the idea of trading a few millimeters for more battery?

In my head, a move like that helps Apple take the "must be thinner" pressure off themselves in one swing AND makes it appear that customer wants trumps nickel & diming profitability and/or the (Henry Ford faster car) "we know best" stance. Or more simply: the Apple that we remember- the one that appears to care about users more than shareholders (whether they ever really did or not)- appears to be back.

Do we consumers rebel because it's not "even thinner" by kicking other useful utility out? Or is that a "shut up and take my money" launch... that also relieves the growing(?) sense that the Apple we think we knew has been lost to the bean counters?

Just a fantasy by a long-term Apple product buyer. If you don't like this one, roll your own. Key concept with this one is that it is relatively easily accomplished... not depending on some kind of major battery breakthrough or similar. And frankly: I think we're well past the day that "thinner" should be at the top of the list for the next generation product development team.
get real, they're just going to announce they've made a new innovation of thinnness
 
If Apple was a car company and was overstating efficiency of their cars, they would be slapped with a fine by the EPA. They are fortunate that they are doing this with just their core computing laptop....But wait, they are doing this to their main computing core laptop, asides from selling soldered SSDs, lack of legacy USB ports, HDMI port and lack of optical port in the headphone jack...which they claim, was an outdated technology, and still kept it in their laptops but dropped it from their phones.

What is the logic behind not just one but many of their technical decisions? I have no clue and I am sure there are many who are in the same camp as me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mkeeley
Just curious! Did Apple question CR's battery tests when their products passed the tests in previous years??

And I need to understand what is Apple doing in their battery tests.. Are they just shutting down the computer and turning back on 10 hours later or what? Because with just some youtubeing and surfing on the web I get no more than 3 hours..
 
I see. Reports from actually customers didn't matter, but something that might hurt sales, at least that gets them to take notice.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Xi Xone
I do not own it, and I was not commenting on my own experience. In no way does my post say that I own the 2016 MBP.

I was referring the many other posts on this forum and others. I was referring to the many news/rumor articles on this site and others. I was referring to Apple's own statements about people have battery life issues.

Is it not okay to comment on my observations? You commented on yours.

There is a big difference in our comments. I am commenting on basis of first hand experience with a 2016 MBP15. Your comment is a comment on the observation of others.

What value have you added with your comments? Nothing.

This thread would be much more informative if only first hand users posted. This way we can compare notes and help each other out. Your comments are just chaff that get in the way of an informed discussion.

Donald Barar
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weaselboy
Jobs would never have let a gimmick like touchbar out of R&D, let alone Apple Watch and this MacBook (Air) Pro

People should stop using what they think Jobs would or wouldn't have done to reinforce their opinions. Just state your opinion and be done with it. None of know what Jobs would have done and he's gone.
 
These 2016 MBP's are going to have a low resale value. For me, Apple won't see me in need of a new laptop until Tigerlake. These reports have not tarnished my respect for Apple. Today, I used Air Drop between my iPhone 6s and 2015 MBP 13 inch and I am reminded why this company makes great products. The seamless integration sending and sharing files reminds me they don't ignore the details. Apple needs to remember that this is an ecosystem and each part counts. If you neglect the Mac, you neglect the iPhone and iPad then it all falls apart. The company is atrocious at web services already. I personally have decided to move my photo library to Google photos to benefit from the extra storage.
 
get real, they're just going to announce they've made a new innovation of thinnness

...by kicking the entire battery out to an accessory add-on product (sold separately of course). ;)

And I'm only half joking there. "Thinner" eventually requires everything of substance to get pushed out of the box. (Some of) our very ready willingness to buy dongles and docks (sold separately) to get ports that used to be built inside the case are just the signs of things to come (out).
 
Last edited:
Totally agreed.

It is so maddening that these guys are overlooking the strategic value of Mac platform in the whole Apple ecosystem.
You know the cracks are appearing when lots of Apple fans are up in arms with what is happening in Apple these days.

Many signs of imbalances within the company showed up this year. Long laundry list of actions big and small that demonstrates Apple execs are out of touch with the user base.
- languishing of Macs - be it MacBook Air, Mac mini or Mac Pro
- screwing up MacBook Pro updates
- too lazy to update iPhone 7 design (to think that this is their most important product)
- whole donglelife thing is so form over function
- killing off the Apple display
- killing off the Apple wireless routers
- removing time remaining estimate

Aaaarrrrghhh, I sense disturbance in the force!
I agree, i.e. The MB Air, all we asked for was a retina screen, and they could laugh all the way to the bank for another 10 years
 
  • Like
Reactions: mwidjaya
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.