"You seem to believe that everything has some kind of malicious intent on copying Apple or something"
Not at all. I saw Google's design for Android prior to the iPhone's release and I then saw Android after the iPhone's release.
Personally, I feel having Schmidt on Apple's board gave Google insight to a competitors product under false pretenses. This isn't a case of reverse engineering, this is a case of inside information.
This isn't about Apple, if an Apple exec was on Google's board and the reverse happened, I'd be equally disappointed in Apple. And before you throw out the whole Xerox story, do some homework and realize Apple paid licensing fees.
You really don't have to agree with me. I see it as a copy and wouldn't feel comfortable using it.
But you seem just fine with it. I am ok with you using Android. I really am. I'm just not fine with me using it.
I am the one missing out apparently, not you. So I don't get why you seem so inspired about this.
As I said in another post, I'm fine with anyone using whatever, I could care less if anyone uses something different from me. I'm a 4S user myself, it's no big deal.
What I'm going after is the claim of "copying" where there's no proof of it. You do realize the first android phone ever was not an actual phone produced by Google. Google only provided the platform OS, the first smartphone to use it was the HTC Dream, AKA T-Mobile G1. HTC is not Google. The G1 doesn't look anything like the first iPhone. The center button on the G1 was a trackball/button combo.