I've had numerous anodized (and painted) aluminum mountain bikes over 2+ decades. Most of those got scratched, but the cause was real clear, like high speed rock impact. Beyond that none of those bikes scratched or scuffed liked reports from the black iPhone 5. Seriously, this is whacky and cheap Apple.
I think we all heard about comparisons of the iPhone 5 to a fine watch. Well, this doesn't happen on a fine watch. Nope.
I feel for the people affected. My white iPhone 5 is cosmetically holding up well so far. Wifi, however, is just awful.
Sigh, clearly you have zero clue. There are different types of anodizing, like I said. Some are much more durable than others - do some reading. I've been dealing with metals and anodizing for almost 20 years. When 'hardcoat' anodizing or 'military spec' anodizing is used the parts are much more durable then type 1 which is likely what Apple has used since it is cheap, and quite thin. So before you ask where my head is buried I suggest you do some reading. Now none of us know exactly what type of anodizing is used by Apple but judging by the issues thus far it seems pretty thin and cheap which would lead me to believe it is type 1.You are very assertive in your comments but are you correct?
http://www.shadowguarddev.com/alex/anodizing/
Where might your head be buried?
BTW - there are NUMEROUS sites referencing the great increase in hardness / wear resistance for ANODIZED aluminum.
Bang against what? Cardboard?
While I see your point, why would they even need a markup? They already have one of the most expensive devices with one of the widest profit margins. They already make their money, time to add some quality back.
Out of the box damage is never acceptable. Especially for Apple.
They sell a premium product and it should be delivered and packaged in a way that it arrives in your hands in perfect condition.
Given your comment, neither aluminum or glass seems appropriate for a smartphone case material.
aluminum is aluminum... And aluminum is soft and easily scratched.
So it is normal in that sense.
However, choosing coated aluminum for a phone isn't the greatest choice on apple's part. (it looks great, though, at least to start with.)
potential customers should stop whining and simply do one or more of the following:
1. Get the white & aluminum phone -- the scratches are a lot less visible since they are the same color as the unscratched areas.
2. Get a skin, e.g., best skins ever are good... Or a good case.
3. Buy some other phone.
4. Let go of your ocd tendencies and embrace the scratches.
Then make it out of something else!
I don't want to spend that much money on something that is prone to scratching.
Normal but it can be made to not scratch. Case in point, my 15 year-old Maglite flashlight. Not a scratch after a decade and a half of use.
It does scratch, but it's unacceptable when its scratches out of the box...
Stainless steel of a Rolex shows scratches in a week.
So you are suggesting to use sapphire crystal to make a phone? LOL?My sapphire and ceramic Rado is scratch-free after 15 years.
Just choose the right materials....
No, not normal.
Apple really screwed up on this one!
With this in mind, I'm going to get the Samsung Galaxy S3. I've heard that even if the iPhone is better in all those "scientific tests" the screen is still almost 5 inches. That makes it automatically better. And the cheap plastic back doesn't scratch like aluminum.
![]()
Do people really expect an unscratchable product? Next thing you'll ask is an indestructible iPhone...
"Oh my god apple! My iPhone fell on the floor and broke! You suck!"
"Oh my god apple! My iPhone fell into the bathtub, isn't it waterproof?? You suck!"
EVERYTHING IN THIS WORLD CAN GET SCRATCHED, GET OVER IT!
So you are suggesting to use sapphire crystal to make a phone? LOL?