Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; sv-se) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)



Not many people on this earth that has changed as much as Jobs. That's something to admire and study.
There's dozens of Nobel laureates and other great minds who would disagree. Apple isn't curing cancer.

Acknowledge? Yes. Study? Hmmm. Admire? Not really.

Anyway, as much as Jobs' drive as CEO has made Apple 2011 what it is today, it is an insult to the likes of Ive, Cook, and countless other extremely talented (and decent) people who have made huge contributions to Apple's success. It's not all about Steve the Ego.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_10 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E600 Safari/6533.18.5)

Wow. That Albert Watson portrait really sucks. Completely boring and uninteresting photo.
 
Wirelessly posted (iphone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

Where's the pre-order link. I'm ready.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A5288d)

For the cover I would have put Steve's trademark black turtle neck and blue jeans. They'd be spread out outward as If laying on the ground. No Steve just the clothes.

That wouldn't be creepy at all.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_10 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E600 Safari/6533.18.5)

Actually a vast majority of living Nobel laureates -- at least those "curing cancer" -- use Apple products and would probably be thrilled to meet Jobs. He's had an incalculable effect on our world and been a great facilitator for such lofty endeavours as science.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_10 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E600 Safari/6533.18.5)

Congrats! The obligatory post on every MacRumors thread accusing people of taking things too seriously. I see you got the open window bit in there, and riding a bike thing, good, good. Kissing your wife, that's a new one. Maybe next time add something about commenting on some other threads to tell people to open windows, ride bikes, kiss their wives. Pay it forward?

What's wrong with asking for things to look good and be designed well? That book jacket is just plain uninspired.
 
There's dozens of Nobel laureates and other great minds who would disagree. Apple isn't curing cancer.

Acknowledge? Yes. Study? Hmmm. Admire? Not really.

Anyway, as much as Jobs' drive as CEO has made Apple 2011 what it is today, it is an insult to the likes of Ive, Cook, and countless other extremely talented (and decent) people who have made huge contributions to Apple's success. It's not all about Steve the Ego.

Apple is curing cancer if curing cancer utilises a user-centric computer, regardless of who made the machine, its a legacy, in part, from Apple's technologies, vision and drive. These are quality attributes of the co-founder.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_10 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E600 Safari/6533.18.5)


What's wrong with asking for things to look good and be designed well? That book jacket is just plain uninspired.

I beg to differ with you. I think that book jacket is absolutely compelling and quite inspired, actually. Look at that front cover photo. Imagine you're walking into a bookstore and there on the front table with all the new books on display is this particular one. Don't you think that this cover is going to draw the curious reader right over to see what that book is, who that man is staring out so compellingly? Reaching for the book, looking at the photo more closely, the viewer may have trouble pulling his or her own eyes away, as Steve's eyes are very directly gazing out from that book jacket.......

The potential reader turns the book over to look at the back, and here again is another photo, this time of a much younger man, but quite clearly the same person, and this time a little more information is conveyed: the young man is holding a computer. Ah, OK.....

Both images are in stark black-and-white. Both images reflect Steve Jobs at different points in his astonishing career. Both images also manage to capture at least some of the essence of this intriguing man, hinting at so much more we don't see.....

I'd say this book jacket art is brilliantly inspired.
 
Agreed

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_10 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E600 Safari/6533.18.5)

Wow. That Albert Watson portrait really sucks. Completely boring and uninteresting photo.

Not just boring, but completely out of date with the 1980s pose
What a wasted opportunity this photographer had - even just a straightforward version without the hand would have been 1000% better
 
I'm very happy to see the amount of people who are saying they want to own the physical book.

At the same time it's funny as all I've heard over the past 18 months or so is that real books are dead, no-one wants them and we should all be buying ebooks (which I disagree with personally as to me ebooks have no worth)

It's nice to see, when reality strikes, people still want the real thing :)
 
Acknowledge? Yes. Study? Hmmm. Admire? Not really.

It's not all about Steve the Ego.

Actually, it is.

I still find it shocking how many people just don't get it. I suppose they are the same types who are responsible for the dumbed-down, group-think, designed-by-committee products out there today. While I haven't studied Steve in depth, and he is not some sort of hero to me, I can readily see that Steve, and Steve alone, is responsible for EVERYTHING that Apple has become. In the hands of a Bill Gates or any other automaton business drone, Apple would have withered away by now, overrun by other bland, uninspired companies.

Steve has a VISION, and is uncompromising about it. Steve has often contradicted entire teams of engineers and designers who wanted to dilute or overcomplicate products and forced them to do it "his way". The thing is, his way is often a model of uncompromising genius in design, form, and function. He has a vision of what the product should look, feel, and perform like, and he sticks with it, regardless of how many people tell him it can't be done. The only reason that Apple products are THAT thin, THAT high quality, THAT elegantly designed, is because Steve demanded it.

Yes, reports indicate that he has often been derisive and abrasive in his championing of a singular vision of Apple products. But without his determination and, yes, assholishness, we wouldn't have the remarkable, revolutionary products we have today.

So, yeah, it is Steve.
 
"no writing on the back"?

Barcode and price, Shirley!

Inside fold of the book jacket, maybe?

Anyhow, I think both photos perfectly capture the essence of Jobs. On the front, a man who is staring at you, almost analytically, as he seems to be in deep thought - an excellent cover to sit on store shelves. On the rear, an iconic computer being held by its creator in a zen-like-peaceful sitting position, almost as if the creation is being nurtured by its maker. Very well artfully done.

Not to mention, coupled with the font that's been made the standard among us Apple users, I'd say this book's appearance likely lives up to the content within the cover.
 
Apple obviously isn't curing cancer, but if those supposed to cure cancer worked and motivated as SJ does, then cancer would have already been cured by now. This is what one should admire (I guess) on Jobs. Yes there are great people and minds out there, but only a few can stand out and actually be able to change and/or affect our lifes. SJ is already one of those that do.
Just comparing different science areas is silly, each one has a purpose. But you can compare core human qualities and here is where Jobs excels.
 
I woulda set the cover in Apple Garamond myself, considering this is a case study going all the way back to the beginning.

Myriad Pro would've been too modern.

I guess Helvetica is a nice, classic, timeless sans.

I'll be downloading this to my iPad on day one.
 
But what about the front and back covers? Are they...

glossy or matte?
Is each page inside glossy or matte?
I hope Steve/publishers have been true to Steve's awful error to doom any and all Mac users to look into the mirror and wonder whether they are the blindest of all.
This is beyond meh; it's feh.
 
stevejobscoverRainbow.jpg
 
Steve has a VISION, and is uncompromising about it.

Yes, to steal ideas from better designers, repackage them with an Apple logo, and then have the gall to sue the initial inventors/innovators.

Quite the visionary.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.