I think that more capable camera sensors will eventually cause the term HDR to become obsolete, and we'll be back with just "dodging and burning" again (with blending continuing as a means to that end).
For sure, I don't think I've ever stacked an exposure from my K-5, it's DR is huge.
(Click for larger)
![]()
A Brown Thrush (with lunch):
![]()
Oh, you should try blending, Reef. How much DR you have is irrelevant to whether or not you decide to blend. More often than not, I'm blending single raw files (double-processed as two exposures) so that I can adjust a photo's tonality only where it needs it. Some photos really benefit from selective editing.
Nice photo, btw. I like the little bit of reflected color in the foreground.
Interesting, what kind of difference would I see blending a single double-processed RAW shot vs dodging and burning (what I currently do) if they're both from the same original source image?
Well, my old article on the subject might explain it more completely than I can here, but you get two benefits with blending over more basic types of dodging and burning:
1) Your adjustments reach into the raw data, so you get the cleanest possible results.
2) Your adjustments can be based on very sophisticated selections, ones that are impossible to produce with simple brushes and gradients.
If you're doing your dodging and burning in a raw editor, then you will still have the benefit of #1, but not #2. If you're doing your editing with layer adjustments in Photoshop, then you can have #2 but not #1. Blending gives you the best of both worlds.
Yeah, I'm missing out the advanced selection potential of #2, I'll definitely have a look at luminosity masks that you mentioned in your article.
Thanks for taking the time to comment Phrasikleia, much appreciated!
The article looks fantastic btw great job there!![]()
Beautifull composition, soft BG...very well done![]()
It's almost as if he's showing off his catch before eating it. Very well done.