Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Windermere ferry. Have a meal during your crossing, see a film, visit the duty-free shop...

hi2h.jpg
 
Just been real quiet around here since that traveling circus left town.......

MainSt2c.jpg


5D2 , 24-105@95 . f9.5@1/1000 , iso 800
 
I love that. The retro car ads a nice touch.



Love this too. Where was this taken, if I may ask?


Bodie , California . It's in the Eastern Sierra's at the end of several miles of bad road after the pavement stops . It existed as a gold mining town from the mid 1800's ,until everyone pretty much left in the 1930's . Except a lot of their stuff is still in the buildings , furniture in some houses , stores stocked , roulette wheel still in the saloon. The State of California maintains it in a state of 'arrested decay' as part of the State park system . The roofs are kept from leaking , and it seems some of the structures have had their contents dusted off a bit , but other interiors are pretty much as you'd expect after being uninhabited for 80 plus years . Surprising how many folks were there visiting considering it's located pretty much at the outer edge of the known universe
 
Bodie , California . It's in the Eastern Sierra's at the end of several miles of bad road after the pavement stops . It existed as a gold mining town from the mid 1800's ,until everyone pretty much left in the 1930's . Except a lot of their stuff is still in the buildings , furniture in some houses , stores stocked , roulette wheel still in the saloon. The State of California maintains it in a state of 'arrested decay' as part of the State park system . The roofs are kept from leaking , and it seems some of the structures have had their contents dusted off a bit , but other interiors are pretty much as you'd expect after being uninhabited for 80 plus years . Surprising how many folks were there visiting considering it's located pretty much at the outer edge of the known universe

Good to know. I live in CA (more towards the center of the known universe though) and am trying to compile a list of places "nearby" that I'd like to visit for photography reasons. I'll go ahead and add that to the list...Seems like something I'd be very interested in seeing. Although I know of several ghost towns a bit closer to my area that I may want to hit up first.
 
The Windermere ferry. Have a meal during your crossing, see a film, visit the duty-free shop...

hi2h.jpg

Beautiful photograph Doylem. There are some old cars on that ferry! The first one is about 22-3 years old and still looks in good shape.
 
Stuart Easton - Mar-Train Yamaha R6 - Donington Park


[url=http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3670/9709494912_3d0c446abe_c.jpg]Image

[/url]

Very nice. Friend of mine shoots a lot of motor sport. Don't really think I have the lens for it (or the budget)!

----------

Just been real quiet around here since that traveling circus left town.......

Image

5D2 , 24-105@95 . f9.5@1/1000 , iso 800

Were you using a filter for this shot? As a newbie I'm a little surprised at the high iso. Care to explain a little?
 
Taken at the same spot as my previous post, just a few metres back and with a wider outlook. Went softer on the sharpening up the back and tried darkening the sides, possibly a bit too much, not sure there as it looks fine large, but small looks a bit too dark in places. :confused:

This is a manual masking merge in photoshop of shots ranging from 1.5 to 30 seconds, it was damn tedious and laborious, but an interesting exercise none the less.

_MG_3531_zps86a08c1f.jpg
 
After the storm. Lake Huron. Ontario

<snip> Your timing with the incredible curtain of clouds is enough to make for a very compelling image. Tighten it up with some cropping on top and at the right, and you've got a winner.

Thanks Phrasikleia... I will give that a try. You suggest my timing was a big factor. I wish I had that kind of "timing". I just happened to be in the right place at the right time.

Rocky Harbour, Newfoundland:

PHD_4007%20-%20Version%203-L.jpg

Peter, in Rocky Harbour, there's a woman who operates a Kayaking / Trail guiding company. Susan Rendell. I grew up with her in Labrador. Did you meet her ? :D The photo you took looks like low tide! You could have scrambled down those rocks and picked a few mussels ! Your lovely photo demonstrates why I have enjoyed this form so much. To see and now "understand" the idea of the leading lines of the fence is so nice. I would have never "seen" this years ago... it just makes our holiday "snaps" so much better! Gotta love that new found land !

Mine for today, another shot of the "weather" on Lake Huron... complete with a family of ducks scrambling for the lee shore:

wb0z.jpg
 
----------

[/COLOR]

Were you using a filter for this shot? As a newbie I'm a little surprised at the high iso. Care to explain a little?

Yup ... I had a circular polarizer on the lens to bring out the clouds, darken the sky and cut glare off the windows of the buildings (they haven't been cleaned for 80 years or so in most cases)
The high iso is because I was wandering around looking into the buildings through the windows . ( Other people were doing it also , guess the cops were in the donut shop :rolleyes:)Needed a high iso to get a decent shutter speed for inside shots . Seeing as I was going from building to building on a self guided tour , I would have been bouncing the iso up and down all day .I had brought a small flash , but that wasn't gonna work as the crud was on the inside ,the light would have bounced back ; a tripod would have helped,except there wasn't a stable place to put one in many cases.Rather than let my gear get in the way and complicate things , the flash and tripod went back to the car and I kept the ISO high.
I know from having had the 5D2 for a couple of years , and many thousands of images , that an iso 800 image will print out just fine up to 18x24 , maybe bigger . There's not a whole lot of graininess , if any , in the printouts . With the 5D2 , I've found that I can go up to around iso 2500 or so without worrying about print quality , at least to my aging eyes .
 
Thanks Phrasikleia... I will give that a try. You suggest my timing was a big factor. I wish I had that kind of "timing". I just happened to be in the right place at the right time.

Being "in the right place at the right time" is an example of good timing.

When I'm out in the landscape, I'm always amazed how quickly (most) other photographers shoot. They get to a spot where things look nice, raise the camera up, press the shutter, and that’s that. They must think of taking a photo as a moment, and the landscape as unchanging... so that any one moment is as good as any other.

Another way of shooting is to think of it as an event, a process, with a start and a finish and an indeterminate amount of time between. The landscape does change... though the changes will be most obvious on a day with some clouds, rather than a sky of uninterrupted blue.

The ‘luck’ in capturing a pic at just the right moment comes from perseverance (“the harder I work, the luckier I get”, as golfer Gary Player used to say). It can also come from being patient. If you stay in one location for 2 minutes, with the hope of capturing a special play of light, the odds are stacked against you. If you are prepared to wait (ten minutes, half an hour, two hours, who knows), you are stacking the odds in your favour.

I used to rush around, trying to fit as many locations as possible into a day’s photography. But I realised - eventually - that if the light is poor in one place, it might be just as poor ten miles away. It’s possible to walk a long way, or use half a tank of petrol, and still not get acceptable pix. It’s also a stressful, ‘results driven’ way of taking pictures.

So now I stay longer in a location: taking time to explore, see things from different angles and relax into the landscape. I find I actually get more acceptable pix by slowing down, rather than being in a hurry. If there are ‘magic’ moments, I’ll be there to catch them: camera on tripod, exposure values set, cable release in hand. Of course, being patient doesn’t guarantee that nature will cooperate, and there are plenty of days when I go home empty-handed. But non-productive days are part of the process too: watching and waiting and being ready.

Somebody passed me a couple of days ago, as I was standing by my tripod, and said “What are you waiting for?” I said “I’m not sure... but I’ll know it when I see it”...
 
Peter, in Rocky Harbour, there's a woman who operates a Kayaking / Trail guiding company. Susan Rendell. I grew up with her in Labrador. Did you meet her ? :D The photo you took looks like low tide! You could have scrambled down those rocks and picked a few mussels ! Your lovely photo demonstrates why I have enjoyed this form so much. To see and now "understand" the idea of the leading lines of the fence is so nice. I would have never "seen" this years ago... it just makes our holiday "snaps" so much better! Gotta love that new found land !

Thanks for the thoughful comments Barry and I have to say that I've also learned a great deal from hanging-out around this forum. Posts like the one above by Doylem are what make this such a valuable experience. :)

Sadly, we did not have the opportunity to meet Susan but we did enjoy the most amazing moose burgers at Earl's. :) The photo was taken at low tide and I did climb down to wander along the rocky shore. I didn't pick-up any mussels though - we had just finished dinner (filled-up on the moose burgers) and were on the road the following day.

--------------

Heading out to fish from Rocky Harbour:

PHD_4079-L.jpg
 
Last edited:
Many miles to go...

Being "in the right place at the right time" is an example of good timing.


I used to rush around, trying to fit as many locations as possible into a day’s photography. But I realised - eventually - that if the light is poor in one place, it might be just as poor ten miles away. It’s possible to walk a long way, or use half a tank of petrol, and still not get acceptable pix. It’s also a stressful, ‘results driven’ way of taking pictures.

Somebody passed me a couple of days ago, as I was standing by my tripod, and said “What are you waiting for?” I said “I’m not sure... but I’ll know it when I see it”...

I imagine my comment requires more data. The shot I posted wasn't exactly in my back yard, it was a couple of hundred klicks away. I understand the idea of exploring the landscape, of waiting for the light... That's why I have posted so many photos from my favourite bog. I know the area and I'm familiar with the light in all four seasons. I wasn't on a camping trip, I didn't have accommodation in the area. I did spend hours on that one piece of shore line and made a number of captures, of the waterscape and of the people chasing salmon. But I didn't have the luxury of being there for days. I could go back to that shore a hundred times and never see the cloud formations as they were that day ever again. Mind you, I could go back tomorrow, and conditions could be better for the eye especially if I checked sun up, sun down, weather forecasts etc.. So, that is what I refer to when I spoke of timing... But I appreciate, and understand, your comment. Barry.

b04g.jpg
 
Last edited:
Being "in the right place at the right time" is an example of good timing.

When I'm out in the landscape, I'm always amazed how quickly (most) other photographers shoot. They get to a spot where things look nice, raise the camera up, press the shutter, and that’s that. They must think of taking a photo as a moment, and the landscape as unchanging... so that any one moment is as good as any other.

Another way of shooting is to think of it as an event, a process, with a start and a finish and an indeterminate amount of time between. The landscape does change... though the changes will be most obvious on a day with some clouds, rather than a sky of uninterrupted blue.

The ‘luck’ in capturing a pic at just the right moment comes from perseverance (“the harder I work, the luckier I get”, as golfer Gary Player used to say). It can also come from being patient. If you stay in one location for 2 minutes, with the hope of capturing a special play of light, the odds are stacked against you. If you are prepared to wait (ten minutes, half an hour, two hours, who knows), you are stacking the odds in your favour.

I used to rush around, trying to fit as many locations as possible into a day’s photography. But I realised - eventually - that if the light is poor in one place, it might be just as poor ten miles away. It’s possible to walk a long way, or use half a tank of petrol, and still not get acceptable pix. It’s also a stressful, ‘results driven’ way of taking pictures.

So now I stay longer in a location: taking time to explore, see things from different angles and relax into the landscape. I find I actually get more acceptable pix by slowing down, rather than being in a hurry. If there are ‘magic’ moments, I’ll be there to catch them: camera on tripod, exposure values set, cable release in hand. Of course, being patient doesn’t guarantee that nature will cooperate, and there are plenty of days when I go home empty-handed. But non-productive days are part of the process too: watching and waiting and being ready.

Somebody passed me a couple of days ago, as I was standing by my tripod, and said “What are you waiting for?” I said “I’m not sure... but I’ll know it when I see it”...

We have a saying here in Montana with regards to fly-fishing and that is "any day on the river is worth it." in other words whether you catch a fish or not is irrelevant, it's just being out there in nature and enjoying it all. I guess the same case can be made for watching a beautiful scene as the time goes by and the light changes, even if you come up empty handed. Thanks for the perspective, Doylem.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.