I've messed around with with a Pixel 2 XL and it's definitely better than my iPhone X as far a camera is concerned. Apple has yet to improve the masking unlike the Pixel 2 XL which is why edges are so soft on the X during portrait mode. I was a bit disappointed. The studio lighting is nice though. Even the masking on my Note 8 has better on portrait/Live mode than my X. Unfortunately, portrait mode is only on the back camera unless Samsung decides to provide a software update to emulate the front camera of the Pixel 2.
Which is interesting as DDXMark rate both the Pixel 2 and the Note 8 a 45 for bokah/portrait and the X at 55.
As I’ve mentioned I don’t use portraits mode at all and also have never even seen anyone with a pixel around here. Note 8s are plentiful.
Here’s for the Note 8:
“
Bokeh simulation on the Note 8 does a pretty consistent job in both low and bright light conditions. Its strengths are a strong blur or depth-of-field effect, which can make for some striking portraits. The shape of the bokeh is a nice circular pattern, similar to what would be achieved optically with a telephoto lens and wide
aperture. Repeatability is an issue, with the effect failing to activate on about a third of our portraits, and a noticeable step in the blur gradient is often evident behind the subject, along with inconsistencies in the amount of noise applied to the blur.
“
Here’s for the Pixel 2:
“
Despite not having a second camera, the Pixel 2 does a good job using software to synthesize blur in both the foreground and the background of images. The feature is susceptible to irregularities from
frame to frame, however, with occasional artifacts along the edges of subjects. Indoor scenes can also display gradient artifacts. Here you can see the improvements over the original Google Pixel, but even the Pixel 2 version shows some depth-estimation artifacts behind the model, as well as in such high-frequency areas as the top left corner
“
And here’s for the X:
“
The iPhone X’s improved telephoto lens also ensures sharper portraits in both indoor and outdoor conditions. The bokeh simulation algorithm applied in Portrait mode is also one of the nicer ones we’ve seen, producing a pleasant depth-of-field effect, a good bokeh shape with nice circular spectral highlights, and very repeatable results. The background blur isn’t as strong as we’ve seen for other devices (notably the Samsung Galaxy Note 8), but that gives the X’s bokeh a slightly more natural appearance. The X lost points for noticeable failures in depth estimation, with elements in the foreground slightly blurred (although not as blurred as the background) whether they’re connected to the portrait subject or not. Some artifacts and masking errors around the portrait are visible on 100% crops, too, but they won’t be particularly noticeable in images displayed on small scale.
“